Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss Anti-Feminism, Men's Rights and Misandry.
4 posts • Page 1 of 1
This point may have already been made, but another problem with the gf situation in the West (other than the females all being horrible dirtbag-humping sluts) is that the ZOG effectively takes young females out of circulation. At the top end the females can become corporate whores of some sort. They will be f***ing men higher up on the totem pole, wealthy playboys, athletes etc. and generally not be accessible to the average Joe. At the bottom end, the females are so hideous and vile they are untouchable and they have little incentive to improve themselves because the ZOG pays for them anyway so they don’t need to land a man.
This situation is bad enough, but it gets worse. Because the remaining females are such a scarce commodity, they don’t need a single boyfriend. They can just randomly f**k the top few percent of men as they perceive them (dirtbags etc.) and get as much sex as they want. Hence the few females still in the girlfriend market are hugely outnumbered by men and can drive a ridiculously hard bargain. We can try to cope with sugar daddy arrangements and such, but as with so many problems the problem will have no solution until the ZOG is deposed.
There's certainly many men whom support the girlfriend situation even though it doesn't benefit them in the long run. The usual thinking is that a wife ties you down like a mortgage, where as dating is like renting. But girlfriend situations actually raise the market cost of getting young women for all guys over the long term in spite of appearing to offer less upfront costs. With marriage young women are removed from the dating pool in equal numbers to men. In girlfriend situations men and women are removed disproportionately. For example let's say an 18 y/o guy date's an 18 y/o girl. 10 years later when their cohabitation inevitably ends and they're on the market again, the guy is going to go find another 18 y/o, if he can. Where as the woman is now lower value. The result is you now have an older guy competing with younger guys for another young woman. This creates hostility between older and younger men.
You believe that cohabiting a/o marriage is preventing today's young women from being (as Corny puts it) "horrible dirtbag-humping sluts", when their main wallet isn't looking?
не поглеждай назад.
"Even an American judge is unlikely to award child support for imputed children." - FredOnEverything
If you really want to get technical, the whole system of boyfriends and girlfriends shouldn't exist at all. This is an invalid form of relationship.
There should only be marriage, engagement (which is also marriage), and single (and meaning abstaining). In this way every man should have an unspoiled wife. Almost every man would have a wife in this situation.
But the other problem, if the stats are true, may be that there are simply more men than women in the proper age range.