Some problems with AWs from my POV

[Adama]

It's my personal opinion that feminism is the inversion of turning women into gods. Do I mean they've become immortal? No, of course not. What I mean is this:

1. Women are righteous and just. They've made women into gods simply by this alone. The woman is always in the right. She is always right. This makes women gods because, only God is perfectly just and righteous. They've removed the individual accountability from women, simply by ascribing all of them god-righteousness.
2. Following from that they are exempt from judgment. They are above that, because they are the source of righteousness and inherently righteous.
3. This exempts all of their behavior. Regardless how evil it is, it is righteous. Can you see now how they've turned women into God? Nobody is ever allowed to do evil for any reason. Yet they ascribe God's righteous judgment onto women, to give them permission to destroy and remain guiltless.

Feminism is the belief in the female. Buddhism is following in the teachings of Buddha. What is feminism but the exaltation of the female?

Examples:
1. Whoever questions women or feminism will receive immediate condemnation, in the form of slander, malignity, insults and all kinds of reviling and shame. This is tantamount to exalting women to godhood, because questioning women is likened to blasphemy.
2. Everyone must submit to feminism or risk destruction, from unemployment to social ostracism.
3. Destruction in the name of feminism or for any particular woman is often the price for questioning feminism or defying any particular woman's will.

That was the macro level. I could go more into detail, but let's go into the individuals on the micro scale.

The egos.

There's the true self and the false self, right? The true self knows what's going on, but the false self is based upon lies and deception. The evil women trust in the false self; the false image. The truth is that women are not brave or strong creatures at all. But the false reality is that women are almighty and omnipotent.

So what are the evil women doing, to maintain the glory of their egos, to maintain the reassurance of the omnipotence of their false self? The false self is built upon the emptiness and the vanity of lies, specifically that they are gods: that they are all powerful, all and ever and most beautiful, that every man wants them, that they have won, that they are the ones on top, the best, etc.

So their egos are based upon the vanity of lies, but what does this mean? That means that in every scenario and encounter, whether negative or positive, absolutely every truth must be reframed to glorify them and their egos. They lie to turn negatives into positives. They believe their own lies themselves, and this is basically the glory of the foolish woman's life.

Quick summary:
1. Evil women trust in and make up lies to magnify their egos.
2. Every scenario is reframed so that she is the best, the winner, the rejector, the better, especially if the worst thing happened.
3. This is what gives evil women psychology willpower and strength: pure lies.

In every situation she must be the winner. She must come out the winner whether she won or not. Unfortunately that means as a man that if you meet one of these broken women, she will use every encounter with you as an excuse to prove to her ego that she's a god and better than you. Everything will be reframed to uplift her, but that will mean those same words are going to destroy your soul, if you believe their words.

Example:
She's perfectly fine with you one moment and another moment without telling you, she's decided to discard you, without making it clear. You continue to contact her thinking things are the same, because she has not informed you that you've been discarded. However, because she wants to believe that she is a god - the most beautiful, wonderful thing on the face of the earth, and that men literally are dying for her - because you continue to contact her after she's discarded you without telling you, she will frame it so that you are a stalker. That's how badly you want her. Even though she never made any protest to you, in her heart and to others you know in common, she will accuse you of stalking because you're obsessed with her magnificence. Or she will lie and claim that you have sexual harassed her, because you want her that bad!

They've essentially uplifted their souls to vanity and by doing so they've become murderers of the soul. This renders them worthless and basically garbage, sorry to say. But these are the evil games evil women play.

Because the evil are truly cowardly, and because they are omnipotent in their false selves, they act as if they are mighty. They will say and do some truly bold things. Bold as in daring. They are always right and perfect. So in many situations women are genuinely afraid but they are going to pretend to be brave, because that's what the ego demands. They have fake bravery, just enough to suck you in.

In the end when reality catches up with them, the evil women will have to lie and reframe their way out of that too, again to the destruction of the man. When they finally chicken out, they will blame the man for being defective, meaning he's unworthy of her (she comes out the winner, when she was just a chicken who thought she was brave but is a coward on the inside). When in reality she's a coward who's deceived herself by her own lies, but they will destroy your soul to uplift themselves to glory.

These are Satan's children, who've taken the Satanic plan of destruction: pursue after evil and lies and ye shall be as gods.

[Adama]

Another problem I personally have with evil American women is that they are often disloyal to their boyfriends (edited).

Women who have boyfriends are out there acting as if they do not have boyfriends. They will act like single women do. Then at the last moment that is when you will learn she has a man. But she should not have allowed you to go that far and she herself should not have gone that far, if she's taken.

In other words, many American women are taken, but they are out there acting as if they are not taken, in order to have fun. You see, the evil women have eyes for other men when they have men already. They have constantly wandering eyes.

The excuses are that they are not dead or that they were just being friendly or it is just innocent fun. But what it really is, is having eyes full of adultery. So they are flirting with men when they have a boyfriend, and/or they are dancing intimately with other men, and/or they are letting men rub up against their bodies, etc. These things are off-limits if a woman is taken, yet they routinely go over this line.

Why do the evil American women flirt when they are taken? Because it is glorious for them to have men want them. It gives them glory to see if they are wanted. It uplifts the ego. So they will flirt just to get it. That's why they'll let you get all they way down to the end, and they know where it's going. It's because they want to steal that fullness of glory. They will not humble themselves and limit themselves to the glory their man gives them. They get off on knowing all these other guys want them too. This is also why many women are addicted to clubs: so they can flirt with, feel desired, rub up against random men, and yet they think they have been faithful. This is real life pornography for women, and few people realize this.

Basically each of these women who do these things is a star in her own eyes. She's a beautiful goddess, and she's out to suck the glory out of every man who dares to come near her.

And when the man finally sets his heart's desire upon her, she disappoints him, because she's greedy for the glory of a man wanting her. When he finally asks, she will reject him. She's a murderer of the heart. She knew she was going to disappoint, but she did it any way. Because she wants to steal as much glory while she can, because she is a goddess to herself.

And the whole reason why you wanted her in the first place, isn't because she's a glorious beauty? At least that's the story she tells herself, and that makes putting you through the wringer worth it to her.

These and other reasons are why it is often not worth bothering with evil women.

[MrMan]

It's my personal opinion that feminism is the inversion of turning women into gods. Do I mean they've become immortal? No, of course not. What I mean is this:

1. Women are righteous and just. They've made women into gods simply by this alone. The woman is always in the right. She is always right. This makes women gods because, only God is perfectly just and righteous. They've removed the individual accountability from women, simply by ascribing all of them god-righteousness.
2. Following from that they are exempt from judgment. They are above that, because they are the source of righteousness and inherently righteous.
3. This exempts all of their behavior. Regardless how evil it is, it is righteous. Can you see now how they've turned women into God? Nobody is ever allowed to do evil for any reason. Yet they ascribe God's righteous judgment onto women, to give them permission to destroy and remain guiltless.

Your stance on this is way exaggerated. There does seem to be a bias toward women being right, or righteous. But it seems to me that most Americans are not persuaded of it to the degree you describe. Your average person could acknowledge that a woman could be wrong, could be abusive to her children, could cheat on her taxes. They get lighter penalties. There may be a problem with insufficient accountability, but not no accountability at all, and not 'godhood'. That's exaggerating.

These problems may be worse with your age groups. I'm overseas now, but I've seen a bit on YouTube about the Orwellian extremes of the far left that try to censur sensible speech. The younger generation may be that way, especially urban populations, than older people, but as a whole, there is a middle swath of the country that sees the whole 'politically correct' thing as having gone too far. In spite of Trump's social and personality issues, almost half of the country voted for him. I think not being 'politically correct' as it is falsely called now helped him win.

Btw, does 'PC" still stand for 'politically correct.' I think I started college about the time those terms were coined, but I haven't heard 'PC' for 'politically correct' in a while. Do young adults use that term?

Some of the characteristics you mention are probably much more true of young people on college campuses than in other segments of society, and of populations in the northeast and the west coast than some of the other parts of the country.

[Adama]

And this is another thing evil women have done.

Because so many of them are basically socially evil (criminals), they make themselves vile in the sight of good people who are not evil, specifically many men. In other words, the evil of many women slanders women in general, and "woman" becomes associated with evil just because she's a woman, because vast numbers of women are just criminal offenders against men.

Evil women make all women seem vile. Because being a woman gets directly associated with being an evil, rotten spoiled person.

Some people then try to make this evil seem like it is normal, which makes it worse. Because if it is normal for women to be evil and to do evil (and to be excused for it because they're allowed to by being female), then who in their right mind really wants a woman? At least who'd want to have love for one? Or who would want to go near one? Why would you let in a destroyer to destroy you?

I mean if every time you interact with this gender, you come out wounded in the heart, you're going to start to think, Hey, the entire gender is filled 100% with murderers. In this way the vast number of evil women have not only destroyed the happiness of many men, but also they have done so to the good women, by making men hide themselves from women.

These are the gender warriors. The women who feel entitled are evil. They are entitled to do evil, is what they mean. Whereas man would say no, go to your place.

[Adama]

It's my personal opinion that feminism is the inversion of turning women into gods. Do I mean they've become immortal? No, of course not. What I mean is this:

1. Women are righteous and just. They've made women into gods simply by this alone. The woman is always in the right. She is always right. This makes women gods because, only God is perfectly just and righteous. They've removed the individual accountability from women, simply by ascribing all of them god-righteousness.
2. Following from that they are exempt from judgment. They are above that, because they are the source of righteousness and inherently righteous.
3. This exempts all of their behavior. Regardless how evil it is, it is righteous. Can you see now how they've turned women into God? Nobody is ever allowed to do evil for any reason. Yet they ascribe God's righteous judgment onto women, to give them permission to destroy and remain guiltless.

Your stance on this is way exaggerated. There does seem to be a bias toward women being right, or righteous. But it seems to me that most Americans are not persuaded of it to the degree you describe. Your average person could acknowledge that a woman could be wrong, could be abusive to her children, could cheat on her taxes. They get lighter penalties. There may be a problem with insufficient accountability, but not no accountability at all, and not 'godhood'. That's exaggerating.

These problems may be worse with your age groups. I'm overseas now, but I've seen a bit on YouTube about the Orwellian extremes of the far left that try to censur sensible speech. The younger generation may be that way, especially urban populations, than older people, but as a whole, there is a middle swath of the country that sees the whole 'politically correct' thing as having gone too far. In spite of Trump's social and personality issues, almost half of the country voted for him. I think not being 'politically correct' as it is falsely called now helped him win.

Btw, does 'PC" still stand for 'politically correct.' I think I started college about the time those terms were coined, but I haven't heard 'PC' for 'politically correct' in a while. Do young adults use that term?

Some of the characteristics you mention are probably much more true of young people on college campuses than in other segments of society, and of populations in the northeast and the west coast than some of the other parts of the country.

Just stop trying to grasp the concept. It's clear you've rejected it in your mind. Move on.

For some reason, this man has not figured out, I'm talking about psychology, not the law. The social deeds that do not stand before the laws of man. Social criminals, not legal criminals. It's spiritual violence, not the kind there is legislation against.

Please leave me be, MrMan.

[MrMan]

Another problem I personally have with evil American women is that they are adulteresses.

Women who have boyfriends are out there acting as if they do not have boyfriends. They will act like single women do. Then at the last moment that is when you will learn she has a man. But she should not have allowed you to go that far and she herself should not have gone that far, if she's taken.

If you feel that way, then you should be happy the girl had a boyfriend and finally told you. At least you know what kind of girl to date.

The boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is almost nothing. It's not betrothal. It's not marriage. It' may have been invented less than 120 years ago, around 1900. Magazines promoted it. Before that, courting was supposed to lead to marriage, not perpetual dating. And the boyfriend-girlfriend relationship evolved into license for fornication in a lot of people's minds.

The one thing a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is, usually, is an agreement not to date other people without giving the other a headsup by breaking up first. But if the relationship isn't good or isn't going anywhere, especially if you haven't slept together (and taken her virginity), what's wrong with breaking up with her if you find someone else more suited to you? That's one way of looking at it.

But then, we need to consider other people's feelings. In old movies based on Jane Austen novels and even Charles Dickens novels, the men of noble character seemed to feel they had a moral obligation to keep girls, who were often quite young from forming an 'attachment' to them if they were not interested. (I've seen movies. I haven't actually sat down and read such stuff. Jane Austen doesn't sound very appealing, but she seems to have been a social reformer against traditional means of forming marriages.) A girl's feelings were to be protected. That's the one problem with breaking up to go after someone more interesting. Not getting her too emotionally involved and breaking off if you see a deal-breaker (e.g. she's actually a feminist, she has different values, she lacks morals, she's likely to be unsubmissive, etc.) may be the best course of action.

The girls you talked to might have been attention seekers, just seeking male affirmation at the expense of you, a male. Or they could have been considering breaking up and going out with you. Or they could have been deciding if they wanted to 'cheat' (again, not adultery since she's not married.) They could also be lying to you. She may look at you because she is trying to make up her mind as to whether she is interested, then either because of looks, your approach, peer pressure, or female flightiness, she just decides against pursing anything further with you, and lies and says she has a girlfriend. If you don't want a liar, she did you a favor.

Some Americans think a girl never having a boyfriend is weird. Some men even think a girl is weird if she is a virgin. In some parts of Asia, if a girl has never had a boyfriend, that's considered a really good thing.

IMO, you are probably better off meeting a girl at church or a Christian event on a college campus or something along those lines. A small segment of the populaton shares your views on women's roles. We actually share a lot of views in common. It's unlikely you'd find a chick in a bar or sitting in a park who is like-minded, though God could arrange such a thing like that for you.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

I think you were too easy on American women.

Anyone who denies what you described is either ignorant or a fool.

I travel the world to, in part, enjoy better women. The differences are STRIKING.

There is a cult of the superiority of women in America. It is based on falsities and it is starting to crumble.

[Adama]

The boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is almost nothing. It's not betrothal. It's not marriage.

No, it is actually a very big deal and I don't know why that escapes you. People are entering into sexual relationships before marriage and calling it boyfriend and girlfriend. They are having sex. That takes it from a simple relationship to close to marriage. It is basically concubinage.

The girls you talked to might have been attention seekers, just seeking male affirmation at the expense of you, a male. Or they could have been considering breaking up and going out with you. Or they could have been deciding if they wanted to 'cheat' (again, not adultery since she's not married.) They could also be lying to you. She may look at you because she is trying to make up her mind as to whether she is interested, then either because of looks, your approach, peer pressure, or female flightiness, she just decides against pursing anything further with you, and lies and says she has a girlfriend. If you don't want a liar, she did you a favor.

And for some reason you have not realized that this is improper activity for women to practice. You think this is nothing? Well this is heart breaking stuff. It is spiritual violence.

Do you not understand that someone seeking to deceive you is violence against your soul? Do you not realize that if someone is sowing discord (trying to separate with lies) between a man and his woman, that that is violence against their souls? This is SPIRITUAL VIOLENCE.

A woman leading a man on, knowing she has a man and that she will disappoint, is committing spiritual violence against both that man she's flirting with and her boyfriend if they are in a sexual relationship. ALL FOR HER EGO. She is a rebel and her ego is her god. She's made an idol of herself, to lift herself up to vanity (of trusting in silliness), for her own glory. And this is the most common sport I have observed from evil American women.

And how is it that you do not realize that if a woman flirts for sport knowing she will reject a man, and then placing the blame upon that man for that rejection, reframing it as him being unworthy and defective, that this is a deception and a great crime against the soul? You don't see this as murder of the soul? Open your eyes to see. This is a crime against the heart, spirit and soul, and many evil American women practice this crime daily.

Nothing bad must have ever happened to you, MrMan. You are just blind to what spiritual violence is and how many women are filled with this violence.

Also, how is it not a form of adultery, if a woman is trying to get a new boyfriend while she is in a sexual relationship with her boyfriend? She's looking for a new lover while she still has one. But people say, oh because it isn't marriage. She didn't make any vows but she is in a sexual relationship with a man that is NOT a form of prostitution, known as concubinage.

[Adama]

I think you were too easy on American women.

Anyone who denies what you described is either ignorant or a fool.

I travel the world to, in part, enjoy better women. The differences are STRIKING.

There is a cult of the superiority of women in America. It is based on falsities and it is starting to crumble.

Exactly. A flirt who intends to disappoint from the start is a thief and a murderer. She wants to steal admiration and adulation for her ego, to feed her confidence. And in return, she wants to issue death to your soul, in the form of rejection. Many women will go farther than just rejecting you after toying with your heart. They will go on to blame you as the reason why they rejected you. When the whole time it was just they wanted to get off on being wanted, but they had no intention of going farther than that.

This is spiritual violence against the souls of men.

Now if you mention this to people who are with them, they will tell you that your perception is off, because they don't want you escaping the psychological torture of these false gods. They will justify the wickedness of evil women, because they themselves also uplift themselves through deceiving you. It is not to their benefit that you wake up to see what the evil women are doing to your soul.

But this is just plain malicious but invisible cruelty. And evil women can get away with it, because people believe that women are more morally upright than men.

I am not talking about the criminal codes of the penal system of man. I am talking about grave offenses against the souls, through deception, cruelty, and all kinds of mischief.

[Adama]

The boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is almost nothing. It's not betrothal. It's not marriage. It' may have been invented less than 120 years ago, around 1900. Magazines promoted it. Before that, courting was supposed to lead to marriage, not perpetual dating. And the boyfriend-girlfriend relationship evolved into license for fornication in a lot of people's minds.

The one thing a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is, usually, is an agreement not to date other people without giving the other a headsup by breaking up first. But if the relationship isn't good or isn't going anywhere, especially if you haven't slept together (and taken her virginity), what's wrong with breaking up with her if you find someone else more suited to you? That's one way of looking at it.

The girls you talked to might have been attention seekers, just seeking male affirmation at the expense of you, a male. Or they could have been considering breaking up and going out with you. Or they could have been deciding if they wanted to 'cheat' (again, not adultery since she's not married.) They could also be lying to you. She may look at you because she is trying to make up her mind as to whether she is interested, then either because of looks, your approach, peer pressure, or female flightiness, she just decides against pursing anything further with you, and lies and says she has a girlfriend. If you don't want a liar, she did you a favor.

The word cheat is meaningless in this context if these relationships are nothing. A person who thinks a sexual relationship between a boyfriend and girl, according to the world, type of relationship is nothing, ought to go tell that to the man whose girlfriend cheated on him by having intercourse with another man. As far as the world is concerned, a sexual boyfriend-girlfriend relationship is essentially paperless marriage for those who shun marriage, and it is also the precursor for marriage for those who believe in marriage.

Now here are the categories in which women fall regarding sex and relationships: Single (Celibate), Wife, Concubine, Adulteress, Whore, or Harlot.

If a woman is having intercourse with a man, and it isn't paid, and she is returning to the same man, it is concubinage. That's the only category available for what she is doing.

Now we can say, that those women who are in these sexual relationships who are seeking new male partners are essentially adulteresses. If they are flirting with other men for sport, they are adulteresses. If they are rubbing up against other men on the dance floor and shaking their behind in some dude's face, they are adulteresses. They have eyes full of adultery.

[MrMan]

Now here are the categories in which women fall regarding sex and relationships: Single (Celibate), Wife, Concubine, Adulteress, Whore, or Harlot.

If a woman is having intercourse with a man, and it isn't paid, and she is returning to the same man, it is concubinage. That's the only category available for what she is doing.

What's the difference between a whore and a harlot in your categorization system?

In the Bible, a concubine was a slave who was taken as a wife. The man was legally her husband. She wasn't allowed to leave him just because she did not feel like the relationship wasn't working out, or because she felt like they had lost the spark or whatever.

Now we can say, that those women who are in these sexual relationships who are seeking new male partners are essentially adulteresses. If they are flirting with other men for sport, they are adulteresses. If they are rubbing up against other men on the dance floor and shaking their behind in some dude's face, they are adulteresses. They have eyes full of adultery.

Calling them adulteresses legitimizes their sexual relationship with their boyfriends, doesn't it? It's implying their relationship of fornication marriage. The commitment can be really low in these relationships. If either of them decides to break up, then they go find another boyfriend/girlfriend as a sexual partner. Some people treat marriage like that, too. It's interesting that marriage came to be treated like that maybe 60 or 70 years after the introduction of the boyfriend. Our dating customs, which treat courtship relationships as overly important and that encourage way too much emotional investment in them, and allows for breakups may actually train people for divorce. I never read that kiss dating goodbye book, but I heard that was one of the ideas in the book. It makes sense.

But the girl you describe sounds like really high risk for adultery if she did get married.

[Adama]

I think you were too easy on American women.

Anyone who denies what you described is either ignorant or a fool.

I travel the world to, in part, enjoy better women. The differences are STRIKING.

There is a cult of the superiority of women in America. It is based on falsities and it is starting to crumble.

Isn't all this also called the 'Gender War.' That's what feminism truly is. I even had one woman a few years ago tell me, "There's a war going on out there."

Feminism is a Gender War. Now why is war so appealing? Because competition brings glory to the winner. Now what happens if the competition is not even? Well, that person might resort to lies, confusion, misdirection, oppression and manipulation and all kinds of evil, to defeat their opponent. Because they cannot win face to face or in fairness.

Lots of people will make lies and twist the truth just to win a simple argument. I wonder how much they'd be willing to deceive so they can have the glory of defeating a whole gender of superior individuals who could defeat them easily in a fair competition.