Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
But I hear you. You just remembered that sl*t, who screamed at the top of her lungs before everybody in the room, "My next boyfriend is going to have to be rich!"
Do you think her next man is in for a good time? Will she love him deeply? Nope, she will suck him for every penny she can get. What would you expect? And mercy? She will be merciless, because she wanted the money, not the man.
The good part here is that she openly tells you, because she is shameless. She has sent out the warning. Listen to what she has to say. There is no love for another human in her heart. Only the love of money.
This is a greedy person. There are greedy men also. It is only that the system has been intentionally designed to increase the percentage of greedy people and worthless women. Since they are makign everyone into a greedy pig, and they have set up marriage and divorce in order to support women, what would you expect the outcome to be, if a sleepwalking man marries a woman who openly tells him she only wants a man with money?
Do you think her next man is in for a good time? Will she love him deeply? Nope, she will suck him for every penny she can get. What would you expect? And mercy? She will be merciless, because she wanted the money, not the man.
The good part here is that she openly tells you, because she is shameless. She has sent out the warning. Listen to what she has to say. There is no love for another human in her heart. Only the love of money.
This is a greedy person. There are greedy men also. It is only that the system has been intentionally designed to increase the percentage of greedy people and worthless women. Since they are makign everyone into a greedy pig, and they have set up marriage and divorce in order to support women, what would you expect the outcome to be, if a sleepwalking man marries a woman who openly tells him she only wants a man with money?
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
Let's try another analogy. Let's say we replaced "man with money" with "man with a large penis."
You see? They are sick people. They are not normal individuals. What kind of woman would tell everyone that her next BF MUST have a large penis? Would any woman say that aloud? Do you think there are many women who think this way? Would you have a bad word to label these women with?
The same is true of the women who like men who have money. They are exactly the same person, except it manifests itself in a slightly different way!
Money can definitely make a man more attractive. It isnt supposed to be the deciding factor, however. It is a bonus.
You see? They are sick people. They are not normal individuals. What kind of woman would tell everyone that her next BF MUST have a large penis? Would any woman say that aloud? Do you think there are many women who think this way? Would you have a bad word to label these women with?
The same is true of the women who like men who have money. They are exactly the same person, except it manifests itself in a slightly different way!
Money can definitely make a man more attractive. It isnt supposed to be the deciding factor, however. It is a bonus.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
There were such things as good providers due to being skilled hunters or whatever. Females generally are attracted to and loyal to their providers. Unfortunately these days that tends to be GovCorp.Adama wrote:Think of it this way. Since some believe in evolution, I will use this illustration. In prehistory, was there great wealth to show off to women? Was there a "monetary supply"? Did the richest men have the largest accumulation of peacock feathers? What distinguished one man as being wealthy while another was just merely of average income? If evolution is true, then the financial theory makes absolutely no sense. Women could not evolve to prefer men with money, because there was never such a thing as money or any kind of distribution of wealth enabling the average man to seem wealthy until just recently in human history.
Poor men generally do have difficulty finding a wife. Where they do get married it would generally be because they are bringing something extra to the table that may not be at first apparent. Of course, if the poor men are stupid assholes they may not have any trouble getting casual sex with Western sluts for reasons we have gone into.How is it that MANY of the broke men we see around have no problem finding wives? Even rotten AWs will marry some of these poor blokes.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
Yes, so the skilled hunter had more animal pelts which he accumulated? How much food did they really need? That's why I don't buy it. They were subsisting on the land (if you believe that theory). Every man better damn well be a skilled hunter. Life would demand every man be able to do that with enough skill to provide for his family. I don't think hunting would be something which would have a large variability. It would be more a matter of, can you hunt enough for us to eat or not? And if a man already couldnt hunt, he'd have been dead already.Cornfed wrote:There were such things as good providers due to being skilled hunters or whatever. Females generally are attracted to and loyal to their providers. Unfortunately these days that tends to be GovCorp.Adama wrote:Think of it this way. Since some believe in evolution, I will use this illustration. In prehistory, was there great wealth to show off to women? Was there a "monetary supply"? Did the richest men have the largest accumulation of peacock feathers? What distinguished one man as being wealthy while another was just merely of average income? If evolution is true, then the financial theory makes absolutely no sense. Women could not evolve to prefer men with money, because there was never such a thing as money or any kind of distribution of wealth enabling the average man to seem wealthy until just recently in human history.
Poor men generally do have difficulty finding a wife. Where they do get married it would generally be because they are bringing something extra to the table that may not be at first apparent. Of course, if the poor men are stupid assholes they may not have any trouble getting casual sex with Western sluts for reasons we have gone into.How is it that MANY of the broke men we see around have no problem finding wives? Even rotten AWs will marry some of these poor blokes.
And besides that, hunting is not an individual activity. It is a group activity. Groups of men go out hunting. Like a team, the individual could not claim all of the glory.
And the food gets distributed among the tribe, right? It's not like they are unevenly distributing the food because one of the men was cooler on the plains than the others.
And yes, poor men do get married and have children. Lots of poor men have children without being married. Money is not as large a factor as it is made out to be. Besides that, there are a limited number of wealthier men from the start. There is not one rich man available for every woman who would want one.
Now if a man's manhood was shorter than average, would he have a harder time finding a mate than if he had one of average size? Very possible. Would that exclude a man from being able to find a wife? No. Same with money or the lack thereof. It would just take him a longer time.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
That provider theory is nonsense. Women are attracted to men who work hard. That is a manly trait. It isnt a manly trait to have a million dollars in the bank. How do I know? Because it wasnt possible for a person to be worth uncountable sums of money until recently. Now tell me, how many animal pelts can a great warrior on the plains accumulate? How many beaded necklaces could he buy with it?
That is a materialistic theory of complete B.S. It is because we live in a culture where you can't live for free. In the old days, you didnt have property tax. You could just farm and eat your own food, dig a well for water. The theories would have us believe that men were competing against one another by providing more what exactly? What is there more of that the woman could make use of? Even for the sake of vanity, if we are to assume that archaic women are as materialistic and superficial as modern women have been brainwashed to be, what would they spend their accumulated wealth on? It isnt like there was a large consumer market of goods. They had the basic stuff, almost by definition of being in pre-civilization.
This theory is designed by people who either don't understand women, or they are trying to subconsciously brainwash women into operating this way (to become greedy wh*res).
That is a materialistic theory of complete B.S. It is because we live in a culture where you can't live for free. In the old days, you didnt have property tax. You could just farm and eat your own food, dig a well for water. The theories would have us believe that men were competing against one another by providing more what exactly? What is there more of that the woman could make use of? Even for the sake of vanity, if we are to assume that archaic women are as materialistic and superficial as modern women have been brainwashed to be, what would they spend their accumulated wealth on? It isnt like there was a large consumer market of goods. They had the basic stuff, almost by definition of being in pre-civilization.
This theory is designed by people who either don't understand women, or they are trying to subconsciously brainwash women into operating this way (to become greedy wh*res).
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
Money is a means to attract women when you can not find another way. If you are unable to attract women another way, using your money can work. But there is a ridiculously large chance that it will backfire. Not every woman wants to be bought, and of the ones you can buy, you would not actually want them in your life if you truly knew them.
It is only recently that a man became capable of lifting a woman out of poverty, mainly because until recently everyone was the same kind of poor, unless you were aristocracy.
It is only recently that a man became capable of lifting a woman out of poverty, mainly because until recently everyone was the same kind of poor, unless you were aristocracy.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
That's a new one on me. Has anyone else noticed this? As far as I have seen, females seem to think a man who works hard but isn't rich is a sucker/loser, and rightly so.Adama wrote:That provider theory is nonsense. Women are attracted to men who work hard.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
It's more the other way - women are attracted to men who have money. It's from women to men.Adama wrote:Money is a means to attract women when you can not find another way
And why should a man who has money and willing to spend it for women try to find another way? No need really to attract women, as they show up at his door by themselves. Hugh Hefner or Bernie Ecclestone are good examples about the reality of life.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
The only way you could believe that is if you think every woman is essentially a prostitute. What kind of women is Hugh getting? Is he getting the family oriented woman? No, he definitely is not. That is why I said a decent man would not want the type of women who go for money. They are greedy wh*res who are mostly incapable of love. They love money, not people, and especially not men. That is exactly why a man needs a woman who wants him not his money. OMIGOODNESS. I don't even understand how men can think this way. Then they wonder why women are terrible when you encourage them to be gold diggers.Yohan wrote:It's more the other way - women are attracted to men who have money. It's from women to men.Adama wrote:Money is a means to attract women when you can not find another way
And why should a man who has money and willing to spend it for women try to find another way? No need really to attract women, as they show up at his door by themselves. Hugh Hefner or Bernie Ecclestone are good examples about the reality of life.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
A man who is willing to work hard is less likely to be poor. The suckers and losers are the ones who try to buy women. Believe me, good women do not want to be bought. Good women lose respect for men when they attempt to buy them. Those men also become suckers, because the women can just take the money (or the benefit derived from it) and keep on going. Ever heard of a woman who asks a man to buy a drink and then ditches him? Or ever heard of a guy offering to buy women drinks and then those women leave him? Why would they do that? Cause women don't want to be bought unless they are spoiled rotten hos.Cornfed wrote:That's a new one on me. Has anyone else noticed this? As far as I have seen, females seem to think a man who works hard but isn't rich is a sucker/loser, and rightly so.Adama wrote:That provider theory is nonsense. Women are attracted to men who work hard.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
The absolute most ridiculous thing is that men truly believe that women who are interested in men with money are actually interested in the men. Don't you see how silly that is? They are interested in the money, not the man.
Another interesting thing is that those men with money know that women want them for their money, but somehow they believe that women who love money are morally upright enough not to try to cheat them? If a person loves money, what lengths will they go to in order to get their hands on that money? We are talking about people who have a relative sense of morality. They will be willing to do almost anything short of murder to get their hands on money. They dont want the man.
And what type of things has a woman who loves money done in her past?
You ever hear of those women who are cheating on their husbands? Do you think that maybe those women who marry for money are more likely to cheat on their husbands with the men they are truly attracted to? You don't think that these gold diggers will be secretly cheating with the pool boy hunk? The pool boy hunk is better than the man he's working for. He can get women without anything outside himself. He doesnt have to pay for them. Her husband has to pay for her, and she still gets to have sex with other men behind his back, and those men will get it for free. In fact, she may be willing to use her husband's money in order to pay that pool boy.
Another interesting thing is that those men with money know that women want them for their money, but somehow they believe that women who love money are morally upright enough not to try to cheat them? If a person loves money, what lengths will they go to in order to get their hands on that money? We are talking about people who have a relative sense of morality. They will be willing to do almost anything short of murder to get their hands on money. They dont want the man.
And what type of things has a woman who loves money done in her past?
You ever hear of those women who are cheating on their husbands? Do you think that maybe those women who marry for money are more likely to cheat on their husbands with the men they are truly attracted to? You don't think that these gold diggers will be secretly cheating with the pool boy hunk? The pool boy hunk is better than the man he's working for. He can get women without anything outside himself. He doesnt have to pay for them. Her husband has to pay for her, and she still gets to have sex with other men behind his back, and those men will get it for free. In fact, she may be willing to use her husband's money in order to pay that pool boy.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
The only type of woman who should be attracted to wealth is one who was born into it. Her family was wealthy, and she wants to marry someone of her own class. I can see that as fair. In that situation I wouldnt say the woman is a gold digger. Just that this is the life she's always known from her own upbringing. Like an aristocrat marrying another aristocrat. An upper class girl marrying another upper class man.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Even being wealthy does not get you dates in America...
This music video sums up western women perfectly. The name of the song is entitled, "Money, Money, Money."Ghost wrote:Then I guess the problem is that there aren't many women left who actually like men as opposed to their money. In the West, that's basically impossible.
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 92 Replies
- 29532 Views
-
Last post by droid
-
- 27 Replies
- 8981 Views
-
Last post by jamesbond
-
- 0 Replies
- 382 Views
-
Last post by kangarunner
-
- 17 Replies
- 6944 Views
-
Last post by S_Parc
-
- 0 Replies
- 1843 Views
-
Last post by Tsar