What is so wrong or bad about sex tourism?

[Teo]

Women aren't that worried about losing sexual power over men. Because if they were, then they would be even more upset about masturbation and porn, which are the real elephants in the bedroom, so to speak.

Masturbation and porn are not proper substitutes to sex

. Most women in America are sexually starved, way more starved than the men, and this is the real reason for their craziness.

If they were starved, they could go into any bar, ask to any man to have sex

[jamesbond]

In any gynocentric society, sex tourism is a bad thing because it tends to expose men to a resources of sex options that undermine the artificially high value of women within that gynocentric society.

In other words, American women have every reason to demonize and support the criminalization of men who seek younger, prettier, and nicer women abroad because it siphons away American women's sex monopoly and renders them irrelevant. American women want to control men's sex and reap men's financial resources. Sex tourism goes directly against that goal.

This is true and it explains why feminists do not want prostitution to ever become legal in America, women would lose their power they have over men.

Why would a man put up with a woman's bullshit, if he can just go to a hoe and get laid without all the hassle of trying to meet women in bars and clubs.

[Shemp]

Women aren't that worried about losing sexual power over men. Because if they were, then they would be even more upset about masturbation and porn, which are the real elephants in the bedroom, so to speak.

Masturbation and porn are not proper substitutes to sex

Yes they are, unless you have sexual hangups, like most Anglo-Saxons.

. Most women in America are sexually starved, way more starved than the men, and this is the real reason for their craziness.

If they were starved, they could go into any bar, ask to any man to have sex

No they can't do that, because they have sexual hangups.

[Teo]

Women aren't that worried about losing sexual power over men. Because if they were, then they would be even more upset about masturbation and porn, which are the real elephants in the bedroom, so to speak.

Masturbation and porn are not proper substitutes to sex

Yes they are, unless you have sexual hangups, like most Anglo-Saxons.

. Most women in America are sexually starved, way more starved than the men, and this is the real reason for their craziness.

If they were starved, they could go into any bar, ask to any man to have sex

No they can't do that, because they have sexual hangups.

I think you are dead wrong..
Anyways..

[droid]

Women aren't that worried about losing sexual power over men. Because if they were, then they would be even more upset about masturbation and porn, which are the real elephants in the bedroom, so to speak.

Masturbation and porn are not proper substitutes to sex

Yes they are, unless you have sexual hangups, like most Anglo-Saxons.

I though I had finally demonstrated to you in the other thread that sex is more than just blowing your load

. Most women in America are sexually starved, way more starved than the men, and this is the real reason for their craziness.

If they were starved, they could go into any bar, ask to any man to have sex

No they can't do that, because they have sexual hangups.

Teach them some of your sexual kung fu

[Shemp]

Women aren't that worried about losing sexual power over men. Because if they were, then they would be even more upset about masturbation and porn, which are the real elephants in the bedroom, so to speak.

Masturbation and porn are not proper substitutes to sex

Yes they are, unless you have sexual hangups, like most Anglo-Saxons.

I though I had finally demonstrated to you in the other thread that sex is more than just blowing your load

The thread is about sex tourism, as in whores and brothels, and why feminists oppose it, in case you didn't notice. Sex tourism is mostly about blowing your load, not deeper relationships. Giving money to a woman with whom you have a relationship is not really sex tourism as most people understand that term.

Also, in case it isn't obvious, I didn't say masturbation is equivalent to partner sex, anymore than gruel is equivalent to gourmet dining. But in both cases, the cheap substitute is just that: a viable substitute for cases where the alternative is priced too high. Which gets back to the argument of WHY feminists and other naysayers oppose sex tourism. If it were because women fear losing sexual power over men, then feminists would oppose anything that threatens that power, including masturbation and homosexuality, both of which pose a much bigger threat to women's power than sex tourism. But in fact, feminists are quiet about masturbation and homosexuality (though they do squawk about heterosexual porn, though not homosexual or lesbian porn). So loss of sexual power is NOT the reason feminists oppose sex tourism.

[droid]

Like i said, it's about getting to touch a woman everywhere and have somr interaction, not just dumping the load. p4p is like going to mcdonalds when you don't have access to a micheline french restaurant or when you just don't want to bother. What you propose though is like eating paper, not a real substitute.

Don't take the Gif personally, that guy just cracks me up, i can't stop watching. I found another one lol

[Kradmelder]

Feminists are quiet about homosexuality as many are lesbians themselves. They are quiet about masturbation as many are so ugly that they have no option but to stick that hard plastic up their twat.

I fareally prefer a willing partner that will empty my load and enjoy it than p4p. I never had to pay upfront. Always had willing partners, but you do pay in the end.

[Shemp]

Don't take the Gif personally, that guy just cracks me up, i can't stop watching. I found another one lol

Nah, I'm not offended. Guy does have a six-pack like me and he's bald like me. But I cut my hair shorter, have a beard, and dress differently.

[Kradmelder]

What I don't get is why spend all that money to fly somewhere just to empty your balls in a nonwhite hole. Surely it would be cheaper to pay a nonwhite American whore.

I can understand flying there to meet and marry them, if that is your fetish to miscegenate, but why just to pomp whores?

At strip bars here I can find a Thai or Chinese whore. Why fly there? In multiculti cesspool usa and Europe even easier.

Like WTF. If i can eat prime afrikander or hereford meat at home, or buy it, why fly to asia for water buffalo mince?

[Shemp]

What I don't get is why spend all that money to fly somewhere just to empty your balls in a nonwhite hole. Surely it would be cheaper to pay a nonwhite American whore.

Actually, white semi-pros, including very nice-looking and intelligent college girls, are not that expensive in the USA, if you are willing to trawl the sugarbaby sites and are a decent-looking and otherwise quality sugardaddy yourself (don't dress or act like that guy in droid's gif) and know how to negotiate (whores, whether pro or semi-pro, tend to have terrible business skills and are easily confused by numbers). I just can't be bothered wasting time with all the flakes to find the few good sugarbabies.