Why Monarchy is better than Democracy in many ways
Posted: August 26th, 2018, 6:58 pm
"There will always be kings. Even if we don't call them that." - Napoleon Bonaparte
Americans generally abhor monarchy and consider it to be tyranny with no freedom. It goes against everything they stand for, they think. And in fact the nation was founded against the concept of the monarchical system. Buts that's not true. What Americans are never told is that Monarchy has many benefits and advantages over the current system in America, which is not even a democracy, but an oligarchy ruled by shadow governments, and a democracy of corporations, not of the common people. But of course Americans are never told this and there is no open debate about this, only an assumption that "everyone" knows a democracy is better than a monarchy. And also, movies and TV shows make monarchs look tyrannical and give it a bad reputation, which is greatly exaggerated of course. Consider the following benefits and advantages of a monarchical system over American democracy.
1. In a monarchy, there is accountability. The monarch knows that if he does something bad, he will be held accountable. The people will know who to blame. It's an open rulership. And if he goes crazy and loses it, he will be overthrown, like the Roman Emperors Nero and Caligula were. Furthermore, a monarch's position is for life, so knows he better make decisions that are best for the long term interest of the nation, because the monarch has long term accountability, unlike a politician who only serves for several years and thus is more concerned with short term interests.
In contrast, in the US, there is no accountability at all. The US is ruled by a shadow government consisting of cabals and secret societies, such as the Freemasons, Illuminati, Skull and Bones, Bilderberg Group, etc, and also the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and of course the evil parasitic central banking cabal that instated the Federal Reserve System. And there is the CIA and NSA as well, which we all know has no accountability at all to the American people.
None of these groups have any accountability. In fact, they pretend to either not exist or are not running anything. So they can do anything they want and get away with it. All they do is elect a puppet they called the President every four years, to take the fall for whatever people complain about, and switch him every four years if necessary to pretend that things will "change or get better". But as we all know, the policies never change no matter who is "elected", which speaks volumes. So the whole political system is a charade with no accountability.
Furthermore, in American democracy, no one wants to publicly take the blame for anything. Everyone wants to blame others for any problems or issues. So everybody plays the blame game and no one takes responsibility for any mistakes or mishaps. And nothing gets done or fixed. Any progress is very slow or doesn't move at all.
2. A monarch cannot be bought and paid for, because after all, he already has everything so he can't be bribed. And his position is secure for a lifetime due to his royal lineage. He loves his people (usually) and views his country as if it were his own body. So his heart is with his people and his aim is to do what's best for them. So his loyalty is to his people, not to some special interest or lobby group or international globalist group. Thus he will not betray his country for foreign interests or to support some globalist agenda for world government. And he will not let a foreign country (e.g. such as Israel) to rule his country or buy it out, or some private banking cartel (e.g. such as the Rothschilds banking dynasty) to seize his country and hold it in debt. Also a monarch does not depend upon votes. His position is inherited and secure for a lifetime. So he can do what's right and act on his conscience, rather than play politics. Thus a monarch is not prone to corruption.
In addition, a monarch does not have to lie or make false promises like a politician does to get votes. He does not have to play such dirty deceptive politics. Thus he is free to be more honest and righteous, acting out of virtue and conscience rather than for bribery. And his position is more pure and clean, as long as he's a good leader with good character and wisdom and leadership skills that is.
In contrast, US politicians are usually bought and paid for, and serve the special interests that elected them and gave them campaign money. Thus they are notoriously corrupt. In a democracy, corruption runs rampant. In addition, they also serve the secret societies that they belong to too, such as the Freemasons or Skull and Bones, in which they've pledged and oath to serve above their own country even. And these networks and clubs they belong to tend to be globalist in nature, and have for a long time now. So they are serving a cabal that wants a NWO and world government, and they will betray their country and their Constitution in order to serve this globalist agenda. This is common knowledge by now, as the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution constantly get trampled under year by year, with the Patriot Act and the NSA spying, etc.
So as you can see, this is a huge difference and why monarchy is so much better for the people and their country. And far less corruptible too. Obviously, "democracy" is merely a back door for trojan horses such as communists, globalists, and shadow governments to seize power, albeit unofficially. It's not surprising then, that a country with a good monarch is proud of it. But in a "democracy" like the USA, all people do is complain about everything.
3. A monarch can act decisively without being gridlocked or stalled, as long as he has good leadership and decision making skills, which he has been groomed from birth to have. Thus a good monarch with good resources can act to make progress and development happen fast. Such as in the case of Dubai, which greatly prospered under a monarchy. In contrast, India has a democratic system, yet most of its people are very poor and there's no good progress or development. A monarch can also take quick action to end corruption, which a politician cannot, because a politician's power is limited by gridlock and competing interests. So a leader cannot be effective in a democracy.
Imagine a ship run as a democracy, where everyone was equal, and there was no chain of command or hierachy. It would never make up its mind and the crew would constantly change its mind like the wind, and be a form of mob rule, which would ruin the efficiency and direction of the ship. Or imagine a military army that was run like a democracy with no chain of command. The army would be ineffective and not win battles of course. Also imagine a corporation run like a democracy. It would never be successful and things would not get done. No one would invest in such a company. Can you name any corporation run like a democracy that is successful and thriving? Probably not.
Contrary to what people imagine, a monarch's job is not to be a dictator or tyrant. But to intercede between the classes in his society. For example, when the peasant class and noble class have a conflict or dispute, the monarch will interceded and try to find a solution. Preferably a win-win one of course. A monarch has the power to be more decisive and act to fix the problem. He does not have to be gridlocked by Congress or Parliament, like a US President is, in which case nothing ever gets done. He can act unhindered and use his good leadership skills. In contrast, under a democracy, progress is very slow and gridlocks and stalls are common, as politicians argue and debate.
4. Also, in a true democracy (not oligarchy like the US) no one has any real power. The people do not have any real power under a democracy. Although in theory a democracy allows the people to govern themselves, in practice it does not. You see, each person has only one vote. Thus their power is virtually zero if you divide each person by the whole population. For example, in the US, the average person is one out of 300 million or so, which means their vote has an influence of 1/300 million, which is virtually zero. This means in reality, individuals have no power at all, thus there is no such thing as "self-governance" by the people. It's just a theory and idea that sounds good in concept, but in practice doesn't work and has no effect. That's the deception of a democracy. It sounds good to the ear, but in reality it's a bad idea and totally ineffective and unrealistic.
That's why the founding fathers of America never said that America was a democracy. They said it was a republic, which is why the pledge of allegiance says "and to the republic for which it stands..." In fact the word "democracy" does not appear in the US constitution or Declaration of Independence. Because the founders knew that democracies don't work. A true democracy is nothing more than mob rule, which is unstable and unwise and unsustainable. No ship without a captain can run efficiently or get anywhere under a democracy of crew members. And no one would invest money in a corporation that was run like a true democracy either. Because it would be an unstable business that is likely to crash and burn, or go nowhere under mob rule, which can never replace good effective leadership. And no army run like a democracy would ever win battles effectively either.
5. A democracy also has false assumptions about reality and human nature. A democracy also falsely assumes that everyone is wise, prudent and intelligent. (which might be more true in Switzerland, but not the US) And that everyone's opinion is equal and has equal value and equal merit. But nothing can be further from the truth. There isn't a shred of evidence in science or nature or reality that everyone is equal in terms of their intelligence or wisdom or value. Equality is a concept that only appeals to low IQ and low class people with small minds. It has no existence in reality and no great liberated minds truly believe in it. We are all different and we must respect that, not try to make everyone the same and bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator, which is insane, but that's exactly what liberals and communists are trying to do.
The concept of "democracy" was introduced to America by liberals and communists, working for a New World Order globalist agenda, to undermine the Republic and its Constitution, and to allow private cabals to come in and take over covertly. It was the only way a power elite could seize control of America, using deception and secrecy, and utilizing compassionate ideals like "equality", "social justice" and "compassion for the poor" to con the nation into letting them take control and make widespread changes. Changes that would increase the size of government and control, which in turn would lead to fewer rights and freedoms too. It was all a scam. For more details on this, listen to the 1967 three hour speech by Myron Fagan, which is on YouTube in many copies and explains this whole deception and hijacking of America in detail.
6. Contrary to what you might think, under a monarchy, the common people have a voice and can be heard. Because each commoner is under the lordship of a nobleman (or duke) in his precinct. And this nobleman interacts and meets with the peasants and commoners that live under his lordship. Thus the commoners can talk to him and influence him, and make their complaints and grievances known to him. Deep down, this is what people want, for their voices, issues and grievances to be heard by someone in a position of authority or governance. No one likes to be ignored and unheard.
Likewise, in a patriarchical traditional family, the father may be in charge, but his wife and children can talk to him and influence him. They have a voice in the family, and direct interaction with the father. So the point is, such traditional system allows DIRECT interaction between the governors and the governed. This is necessary and natural in any good society and relationship. It's what people want and prefer too.
In contrast, in the US, the average person has no one to voice their complaints or grievances to. No one in authority listens to him or cares. If he writes his Congressman, his letter will be ignored. And commoners do not have any access to talk to the US President of course. Or to any other politician or leader at all. He will even have a hard time getting hold of the mayor of his city or town too. And of course, the mainstream corporate media does not let average people speak out on TV. Thus the average person has no voice and is not heard in the system we have in America.
What a terrible system of course. No one likes that. Yet that's exactly what America and its great "democracy" provides - no voice and no power for commoners at all. It's no wonder than that Americans generally feel like they have no voice or say in any matter related to politics or government, and thus feel alienated from their government and politics. The reasons are a no brainer. The average person has no ability to influence government policy at all, and no say in the matter either. All they can do is cast a vote, but as we all know, that's a charade and does not change any government policy in any significant way. So much for "democracy".
Instead, all an average commoner can do in America is watch the news and listen to BS on TV from politicians, which only recycle the same lies over and over again. US politicians may occasionally feed them crumbs to give people a little hope and release their steam, but they will never change anything major. Because the US is a democracy of corporations (aka corporatocracy), not of people, which means only big corporations and institutions get a say in how things are run, but not the average person of course. It's all a SCAM and deception, plain and simple.
7. Political campaigns and elections cost a lot of money and are expensive. So a lot of money is wasted on them. Especially in America. And of course, all that money can only come through special interests and bribery. In such a system, whoever has the most money has the most influence, which undermines any form of democracy of course. And lies about it as well. A monarchy frees a society from such corruption and compromised politicians, and is thus cleaner and more efficient.
I will post more on this later. But for now, those are some big reasons for you to consider and think about, as to why monarchy is better than democracy and works better too. This should be talked about more and should be an open issue. But of course, the US media and culture will never allow it, because any praise of monarchy is taboo in America. The US propaganda and control system is based on deceit and secrecy, which smart aware people know by now, so obviously such things will not be discussed openly, especially under a system that is run by deception and a manufactured image of reality.
Here is an article about the benefits of Monarchy and why it is better than Democracy.
http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/25/t ... f-monarchy
@Tsar where are you? What do you think?
Americans generally abhor monarchy and consider it to be tyranny with no freedom. It goes against everything they stand for, they think. And in fact the nation was founded against the concept of the monarchical system. Buts that's not true. What Americans are never told is that Monarchy has many benefits and advantages over the current system in America, which is not even a democracy, but an oligarchy ruled by shadow governments, and a democracy of corporations, not of the common people. But of course Americans are never told this and there is no open debate about this, only an assumption that "everyone" knows a democracy is better than a monarchy. And also, movies and TV shows make monarchs look tyrannical and give it a bad reputation, which is greatly exaggerated of course. Consider the following benefits and advantages of a monarchical system over American democracy.
1. In a monarchy, there is accountability. The monarch knows that if he does something bad, he will be held accountable. The people will know who to blame. It's an open rulership. And if he goes crazy and loses it, he will be overthrown, like the Roman Emperors Nero and Caligula were. Furthermore, a monarch's position is for life, so knows he better make decisions that are best for the long term interest of the nation, because the monarch has long term accountability, unlike a politician who only serves for several years and thus is more concerned with short term interests.
In contrast, in the US, there is no accountability at all. The US is ruled by a shadow government consisting of cabals and secret societies, such as the Freemasons, Illuminati, Skull and Bones, Bilderberg Group, etc, and also the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and of course the evil parasitic central banking cabal that instated the Federal Reserve System. And there is the CIA and NSA as well, which we all know has no accountability at all to the American people.
None of these groups have any accountability. In fact, they pretend to either not exist or are not running anything. So they can do anything they want and get away with it. All they do is elect a puppet they called the President every four years, to take the fall for whatever people complain about, and switch him every four years if necessary to pretend that things will "change or get better". But as we all know, the policies never change no matter who is "elected", which speaks volumes. So the whole political system is a charade with no accountability.
Furthermore, in American democracy, no one wants to publicly take the blame for anything. Everyone wants to blame others for any problems or issues. So everybody plays the blame game and no one takes responsibility for any mistakes or mishaps. And nothing gets done or fixed. Any progress is very slow or doesn't move at all.
2. A monarch cannot be bought and paid for, because after all, he already has everything so he can't be bribed. And his position is secure for a lifetime due to his royal lineage. He loves his people (usually) and views his country as if it were his own body. So his heart is with his people and his aim is to do what's best for them. So his loyalty is to his people, not to some special interest or lobby group or international globalist group. Thus he will not betray his country for foreign interests or to support some globalist agenda for world government. And he will not let a foreign country (e.g. such as Israel) to rule his country or buy it out, or some private banking cartel (e.g. such as the Rothschilds banking dynasty) to seize his country and hold it in debt. Also a monarch does not depend upon votes. His position is inherited and secure for a lifetime. So he can do what's right and act on his conscience, rather than play politics. Thus a monarch is not prone to corruption.
In addition, a monarch does not have to lie or make false promises like a politician does to get votes. He does not have to play such dirty deceptive politics. Thus he is free to be more honest and righteous, acting out of virtue and conscience rather than for bribery. And his position is more pure and clean, as long as he's a good leader with good character and wisdom and leadership skills that is.
In contrast, US politicians are usually bought and paid for, and serve the special interests that elected them and gave them campaign money. Thus they are notoriously corrupt. In a democracy, corruption runs rampant. In addition, they also serve the secret societies that they belong to too, such as the Freemasons or Skull and Bones, in which they've pledged and oath to serve above their own country even. And these networks and clubs they belong to tend to be globalist in nature, and have for a long time now. So they are serving a cabal that wants a NWO and world government, and they will betray their country and their Constitution in order to serve this globalist agenda. This is common knowledge by now, as the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution constantly get trampled under year by year, with the Patriot Act and the NSA spying, etc.
So as you can see, this is a huge difference and why monarchy is so much better for the people and their country. And far less corruptible too. Obviously, "democracy" is merely a back door for trojan horses such as communists, globalists, and shadow governments to seize power, albeit unofficially. It's not surprising then, that a country with a good monarch is proud of it. But in a "democracy" like the USA, all people do is complain about everything.
3. A monarch can act decisively without being gridlocked or stalled, as long as he has good leadership and decision making skills, which he has been groomed from birth to have. Thus a good monarch with good resources can act to make progress and development happen fast. Such as in the case of Dubai, which greatly prospered under a monarchy. In contrast, India has a democratic system, yet most of its people are very poor and there's no good progress or development. A monarch can also take quick action to end corruption, which a politician cannot, because a politician's power is limited by gridlock and competing interests. So a leader cannot be effective in a democracy.
Imagine a ship run as a democracy, where everyone was equal, and there was no chain of command or hierachy. It would never make up its mind and the crew would constantly change its mind like the wind, and be a form of mob rule, which would ruin the efficiency and direction of the ship. Or imagine a military army that was run like a democracy with no chain of command. The army would be ineffective and not win battles of course. Also imagine a corporation run like a democracy. It would never be successful and things would not get done. No one would invest in such a company. Can you name any corporation run like a democracy that is successful and thriving? Probably not.
Contrary to what people imagine, a monarch's job is not to be a dictator or tyrant. But to intercede between the classes in his society. For example, when the peasant class and noble class have a conflict or dispute, the monarch will interceded and try to find a solution. Preferably a win-win one of course. A monarch has the power to be more decisive and act to fix the problem. He does not have to be gridlocked by Congress or Parliament, like a US President is, in which case nothing ever gets done. He can act unhindered and use his good leadership skills. In contrast, under a democracy, progress is very slow and gridlocks and stalls are common, as politicians argue and debate.
4. Also, in a true democracy (not oligarchy like the US) no one has any real power. The people do not have any real power under a democracy. Although in theory a democracy allows the people to govern themselves, in practice it does not. You see, each person has only one vote. Thus their power is virtually zero if you divide each person by the whole population. For example, in the US, the average person is one out of 300 million or so, which means their vote has an influence of 1/300 million, which is virtually zero. This means in reality, individuals have no power at all, thus there is no such thing as "self-governance" by the people. It's just a theory and idea that sounds good in concept, but in practice doesn't work and has no effect. That's the deception of a democracy. It sounds good to the ear, but in reality it's a bad idea and totally ineffective and unrealistic.
That's why the founding fathers of America never said that America was a democracy. They said it was a republic, which is why the pledge of allegiance says "and to the republic for which it stands..." In fact the word "democracy" does not appear in the US constitution or Declaration of Independence. Because the founders knew that democracies don't work. A true democracy is nothing more than mob rule, which is unstable and unwise and unsustainable. No ship without a captain can run efficiently or get anywhere under a democracy of crew members. And no one would invest money in a corporation that was run like a true democracy either. Because it would be an unstable business that is likely to crash and burn, or go nowhere under mob rule, which can never replace good effective leadership. And no army run like a democracy would ever win battles effectively either.
5. A democracy also has false assumptions about reality and human nature. A democracy also falsely assumes that everyone is wise, prudent and intelligent. (which might be more true in Switzerland, but not the US) And that everyone's opinion is equal and has equal value and equal merit. But nothing can be further from the truth. There isn't a shred of evidence in science or nature or reality that everyone is equal in terms of their intelligence or wisdom or value. Equality is a concept that only appeals to low IQ and low class people with small minds. It has no existence in reality and no great liberated minds truly believe in it. We are all different and we must respect that, not try to make everyone the same and bring everyone down to the lowest common denominator, which is insane, but that's exactly what liberals and communists are trying to do.
The concept of "democracy" was introduced to America by liberals and communists, working for a New World Order globalist agenda, to undermine the Republic and its Constitution, and to allow private cabals to come in and take over covertly. It was the only way a power elite could seize control of America, using deception and secrecy, and utilizing compassionate ideals like "equality", "social justice" and "compassion for the poor" to con the nation into letting them take control and make widespread changes. Changes that would increase the size of government and control, which in turn would lead to fewer rights and freedoms too. It was all a scam. For more details on this, listen to the 1967 three hour speech by Myron Fagan, which is on YouTube in many copies and explains this whole deception and hijacking of America in detail.
6. Contrary to what you might think, under a monarchy, the common people have a voice and can be heard. Because each commoner is under the lordship of a nobleman (or duke) in his precinct. And this nobleman interacts and meets with the peasants and commoners that live under his lordship. Thus the commoners can talk to him and influence him, and make their complaints and grievances known to him. Deep down, this is what people want, for their voices, issues and grievances to be heard by someone in a position of authority or governance. No one likes to be ignored and unheard.
Likewise, in a patriarchical traditional family, the father may be in charge, but his wife and children can talk to him and influence him. They have a voice in the family, and direct interaction with the father. So the point is, such traditional system allows DIRECT interaction between the governors and the governed. This is necessary and natural in any good society and relationship. It's what people want and prefer too.
In contrast, in the US, the average person has no one to voice their complaints or grievances to. No one in authority listens to him or cares. If he writes his Congressman, his letter will be ignored. And commoners do not have any access to talk to the US President of course. Or to any other politician or leader at all. He will even have a hard time getting hold of the mayor of his city or town too. And of course, the mainstream corporate media does not let average people speak out on TV. Thus the average person has no voice and is not heard in the system we have in America.
What a terrible system of course. No one likes that. Yet that's exactly what America and its great "democracy" provides - no voice and no power for commoners at all. It's no wonder than that Americans generally feel like they have no voice or say in any matter related to politics or government, and thus feel alienated from their government and politics. The reasons are a no brainer. The average person has no ability to influence government policy at all, and no say in the matter either. All they can do is cast a vote, but as we all know, that's a charade and does not change any government policy in any significant way. So much for "democracy".
Instead, all an average commoner can do in America is watch the news and listen to BS on TV from politicians, which only recycle the same lies over and over again. US politicians may occasionally feed them crumbs to give people a little hope and release their steam, but they will never change anything major. Because the US is a democracy of corporations (aka corporatocracy), not of people, which means only big corporations and institutions get a say in how things are run, but not the average person of course. It's all a SCAM and deception, plain and simple.
7. Political campaigns and elections cost a lot of money and are expensive. So a lot of money is wasted on them. Especially in America. And of course, all that money can only come through special interests and bribery. In such a system, whoever has the most money has the most influence, which undermines any form of democracy of course. And lies about it as well. A monarchy frees a society from such corruption and compromised politicians, and is thus cleaner and more efficient.
I will post more on this later. But for now, those are some big reasons for you to consider and think about, as to why monarchy is better than democracy and works better too. This should be talked about more and should be an open issue. But of course, the US media and culture will never allow it, because any praise of monarchy is taboo in America. The US propaganda and control system is based on deceit and secrecy, which smart aware people know by now, so obviously such things will not be discussed openly, especially under a system that is run by deception and a manufactured image of reality.
Here is an article about the benefits of Monarchy and why it is better than Democracy.
http://reason.com/archives/2013/07/25/t ... f-monarchy
@Tsar where are you? What do you think?