Update: WE ARE BACK ONLINE! The Forum has been RESTORED! See announcement here. If there are any problems or issues, please report them in the announcement thread. Note: Unfortunately I was not able to import the posts made after the crash (on Sept 18) into the restored forum. However, I exported all the posts submitted after the crash into a Word file, so you can download it, find your posts and re-post them. Download the posts here. Thanks for your patience and welcome back everyone!
Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Monday nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE AFA Seminar! See locations and dates here.
View Active Topics View Your Posts Latest 100 Topics FAQ Topics Mobile Friendly Theme
Discuss issues related to government, politics, and law.
1 post • Page 1 of 1
It would seem not. The Jews/communists seem to control things all the way through to internationally regulated institutions that you can’t legally have alternatives to even if you had the billions of dollars to try to do so. So for example, funds transfers. Patreon is currently banning people for not being communists. Well you say, just set up an alternative to Patreon. But when people do that, PayPal and Stripe refuse to deal with them. So you set up an alternative to PayPal and Stripe to cater to non-communists. But then Mastercard and Visa refuse to deal with you. What are you going to do - create an entire parallel banking system for non-communists? Even if you had the money to do this you would not be allowed to.
Clearly there needs to be a law enforcement solution to this problem. The market cannot cope. Communist infiltrators have taken over key infrastructure and are sabotaging the basic functioning of society. Someone needs to act. If formal law enforcement is too corrupt to act then citizens need to take it upon themselves to address these criminal acts just as they have done in the past.