Discuss culture, living, traveling, relocating, dating or anything related to the Asian countries - China, The Philippines, Thailand, etc.
This trend is occuring in all industrialized countries not just Japan. I agree with most of the authors views except for Japanese women being treated like second class citizens, like all countries the Japanese suicide rate for men is much higher than women.
Japans Reproductive Breakdown
http://www.henrymakow.com/japans-demogr ... tmare.html
Dumbfucks think they should embrace god and western culture even more. What happened to Japan to make it so p***y was adopting western tradition in the first place, and virtually destroying the macho, disciplined, manly samurai class where worth was often decided by life or death on the battlefield or in personal duels to the death. It is f***ing western imperialism and western imperialist bullies that made Japan go through the Meiji Restoration and adopt pretty much everything western and lose basically all of its past culture, except that they carried on Bushido and manliness until WWII but was defeated and then most of the alpha/manly men died and only the beta phaggot men were left to reproduce or the alpha men who survived failed to teach their children about the importance of the willpower to keep fighting the good fight, even if the odds are against them. My grandfather was one of those Japanese Imperial Army soldiers and taught me NEVER to give up, especially against the tyrannical western imperialists now in the form of certain Israeli interest groups and white supremacist Americans who control the government and much of the military.
These f***ing phaggot ass flower boys need to go to the f***ing gym and start learning martial arts. We need our old fighting spirit back if we want to unite East Asia by uniting Korea, Japan, and China, and then creating a union that no western power would dare bully. My fellow Japanese need to learn from the modern Chinese about a thing or two about being PROUD to be Asian and Japanese instead of being America's bitch.
First the men need to learn to be men and martial arts must be made mandatory to all physically fit men. Also, Japan needs its own military, which is the most MASCULINE institution there is. America and the west needs to GET THE f**k OUT. Once Japan has its own military and makes it mandatory for all fit men between 18-21 to serve the country for at least 4 years, and the culture of martial arts and manliness has been reborn. Only then will Japan regain its dignity and pride. And they are idiotic to keep viewing China as the enemy when it is in fact America and the west/western european/anglo imperialism that has emasculated them. They need to wake the f**k up and prepare themselves for f***ing war.
In fact all of Asia needs to unite. The Japanese once thought of creating a pan Asian union as well but they instead turned on their fellow Asians and butchered them (like the Rape of Nanking). Obviously f***ing psychopathic western-imperialist influenced politicians did that in WWII because they thought the only way to compete with the west was to BE LIKE THEM, which includes genocide and other completely dishonorable tactics. The leftists in Japan, like my grandfather wanted to form an alliance with China and to let Korea have its sovereignty back and to eventually create an Asian union, which was also the dream of Sun Yat Sen.
Imagine if China, Korea, Japan, united and treated each other as equals and as brothers, and stopped the bickering. If Japan kowtowed to China for the bullshit that happened between the 1800s and 1945. If Korea and China kowtow to each other for invading each other repeatedly. And then Mongolia joins the group along with Taiwan, SE Asia, and Singapore. This Asian union would be an economic powerhouse, and with the right direction, a formidable military force capable of challenging the bully f***ing phaggot ass piece of shit that is called the United States of White Supremacist Imperialist America who are bent on taking all the Asian women through hollywood manipulation and by spreading pollution and waste and using nukes in WWII to cause disease to this generation of Japanese, which helped along the process of emasculation of the Japanese men and many Asian men.
They also need to kick out all the f***ing non-Asians in Asia there trying to get Asian women and using their white privilege, especially if these non-Asians are disrespecting the culture, treating the women like whores, and being generally arrogant, narcissistic, psychopathic assholes. You never see Asian men go to Europe, whore around with the women and disrespect the culture, unless these Asian men are lowlives accompanied by some anglo-American fratboy assholes.
This is f***ing war and Asia needs to wake up to the psychological warfare the west has been waging against them since the 1800s all the way until present day. Asians in other countries such as anglosphere countries need to also realize that we are considered the enemy by most people and that we will never be able to integrate no matter how hard we try because it is ingrained in anglo culture to view Asians, especially Asian men as subhuman and to view Asian women as whores. Westerners have no respect for us. Even though I am a "westerner" myself,I have NEVER felt included and have never been treated equally and have only been treated with hostility. Idiot Asian Americans and other Asians in other countries who live in their own little bubble or have never seen the very ugly side of America or never wonder what westerners say when we aren't around, well you are idiots. Because some of the white guys I know have told me that in private discussions without minorities, they often talk about Asians and Africans in subhuman terms. We are on the frontlines here and we have to start by also changing our image in western media, so that Asian men can have some more f***ing self respect and stop being such gigantic p***y phaggots.
It's also true that they decided to nosedive into adopting many aspects of Western (mainly Anglosaxon) culture after their had their egos badly crushed by a WW2 defeat. It's also true that they have been the first to embark on a sustainable, if not inward-looking, social and economic model that blends their own traditional values and those of the West. How original and sustainable are China's or South Korea's paths, time will tell. I am not very optimistic, especially about China.
China has already destroyed whatever real Chinese culture there was left. China, with the peasant commie uprising and destruction of traditional Chinese culture, adoption of many western modes of thought (communism being one of them), and the current obsession with capitalism and money..... none of these are traditional Chinese culture.. there IS a reason that merchants were the lowest class in most of Asia, especially in China, before the modern era, but unlike Japan, the warrior class was also viewed with disdain in China where scholars were revered/people who did well on the Imperial Examinations. Japan and Korea have more of a military-revering tradition.
Anyways, you do not see Chinese wearing Han Fu anymore nor do you see Koreans wearing their traditional clothing nor do you see most Japanese wearing kimonos or kimonos + hakamas. I would say that East Asia has already lost most of its culture and replaced it with western/anglo-saxon culture due to western imperialism, many defeats, Japan adopting western culture to try to compete "at the same level" and ending up defeated in WWII, becoming emasculated, etc. etc.
I guess the positive is that commie China is now rediscovering its great heritage, producing many movies glorifying the Chinese warriors of old, especially the very romanticized Three Kingdoms period with heroes like Guan Yu, Zhang Fei, Cao Cao, Lu Bu, Zhou Yu, Sun Quan, Zhao Zi Long, Zhu Ge Liang, etc. It is also increasing the patriotism there. Even many people of Japanese descent such as myself are familiar with these heroes, much the way Japan has Musashi, Sakamoto Ryoma, etc.
These warriors of old fought with halberds or spears that weighed from 35 lbs to 65 lbs at the heaviest (probably Guan Yu's Guan Dao). They were the equivalent of today's strongmen who bench 600+ lbs or deadlift 700+ lbs except they did it with less nutrition and actually used their skills/strength/intelligence on the battlefield.
Young Asian males need to have these guys as role models. These were certainly my heroes growing up, which helped protect me against some of the negative emasculating affects of Hollywood.
Enough with the phaggotry. Asian males need to reawaken their inner warrior spirits.
Zhao Zi Long
Three Brothers vs. Lu Bu
Musashi and Sasaki Kojiro
lone_yakuza, you need to do your part as the last remaining Japanese man with samurai spirit and go to Japan to impregnate every single female possible--consent be damned. You need to make Japan shine again. Show all the women the majesty of your "katana."
I am a terrible person.
Those lands are in no less of a decline smart ass, minus all the glory that Japan had in the last 50 years. The difference is Japan went through heavy industrialization and an economic boom after WWII and developed so rapidly that by the 60s and 70s it pretty much had everything Western Europe did. Places like South Korea, Singapore and Taiwan lagged behind although saw much better days than Asian nations handicapped by Communism, like China which is still playing catch up. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Asian_Tigers
Verbal diarrhea coming out of Lone Filipino is nothing surprising, but I expected better of you. Using degenerate pop-culture, the Jews completely inverted Korean society in less than 15 years (and f***ed it for decades to come). And guess what, it's poisoning much of Asia - that's right, because it's become Korea washed.
Yes of course, in the Japanese scheme of things, Filipinos were sub-human. It was not just the rape of Nanking, it was the rape of everywhere the imperial Japanese went. My roots in the Philippines date all the way back to when my father fought with Filipinos to drive the Japanese butchers from the Philippines. There are still a few very old Filipinas left who survived the massive rape camps established by the Japanese. My Filipino Tatay who passed away several years ago was an eye-witness to the slaughter of entire towns in retaliation for Guerrilla activity against the Japanese army. This was all part of Japan's effort to "unify" Asia, all under Japan's rule of course...LOL
and if you were not really into the Japanese economic co-prosperity sphere, you were toast. Of course, Malay and other SE Asian peoples were to function as plantation slaves for the "Superior" northern Asian peoples under this scheme.
So as far as being in the Philippines, I have far more of a right to be here than descendants of the Imperial Japanese butchers or some Yakuza punk tooting in the wind.
Misamis Oriental, Mindanao.
You have a very interesting perspective, but I admit I am not very knowledgeable as to where you are coming from. My mother is fully Chinese and my dad is blonde with a mix of European ethnicities. What do you make of Bruce Lee marrying a white woman? I always thought it very regrettable that he died early because his Taoist beliefs seem to come in line with anti-Communism. He was never explicitly political, but I imagine if he had lived longer he might have been an icon resisting Asian Communism. In any case, I do claim ignorance. What is this cultural war you are talking about? Please enlighten me. I don't know enough of the history. I am ethnically split half and half between white and Asian, but I don't have a bias either way. The idea of mandatory martial arts instruction for Japanese is similar to Israel's IDF. Masculinity is very important to me as well. America has become increasingly feminised.
Edit: A bit more. My grandparents, the Chinese ones, opposed my parent's marriage. They even sent my uncle to talk my mom out of it. Eventually they accepted my dad though. He's a lawyer, so he takes care of the family's legal problems. Two of my cousins recently married white men. One was from a Cuban immigrant family actually. Both have young children.
That's real funny because before the Japanese, the European Imperialists went around SE Asia, parts of China, and yes in the Philliipnes etc,. and raped and pillaged yet today people only remember the Japanese as the villains. Yes obviously the Japanese were in the wrong, but don't think that westerners can just get away with all the raping and pillaging and intentional psychological warfare to destroy Asia.
No I don't really consider the Phillippines to be part of East Asia neither do most East Asians nor do most Filipinos themselves. When I am talking about kicking out the west/America, I am talking mainly about Japan and South Korea where there are military bases and where American soldiers often rape local girls.
Like I said, the Japanese you are talking about were the propaganda fed Japanese who adopted the Right Wing Japanese Imperialist views, which were based on the theory that they should copy "the west" and "western imperialists" in genocidal methods, etc. to establish "Empire" just like the way white Americans butchered and waged germ warfare on American Indians all across the New World and the same way Africa was split up and redrawn into countries that had rival tribes so that they would in-fight and the European imperialists could go in and enslave and strip the land of its resources.
If I want to see a pan-Asia, all Asian ethnicities must view and treat each other as equals and realize that the "white man" does not view Asians as equals.
They view Asian women as their service whores that they can bang by the dozen and to be their subservient sucky sucky long time whore. So Asian girls from Asia who end up with one of those anglo chauvinists need to realize that if the anglo guy does not respect the Asian culture and does not respect Asian men, then it is pretty obvious why he is there -> to get his Asian whore that he thinks he deserves even though he does not deserve anything.
Not sure why Filipinos love Anglos and Americans so much when this is the kind of language used to describe them:
The book Benevolent Assimilation recounts that Taft "assured President McKinley that 'our little brown brothers' would need 'fifty or one hundred years' of close supervision 'to develop anything resembling Anglo-Saxon political principles and skills.'", and reports that the military greeted Taft's assertion "that 'Filipinos are moved by similar considerations to those which move other men' with utter scorn"
The term was not originally intended to be derogatory, nor an ethnic slur; instead, it is a reflection of "paternalist racism", shared also by Theodore Roosevelt.
Paternalist racism is still racism.
"American atrocities during the Phillippine American War
See also: 1902_Lodge_Committee_investigating_Philippine-American_war_crimes#Alleged_war_crimes
Enraged by a guerrilla massacre of U.S. troops on the Island of Samar, General Jacob H. Smith retaliated by carrying out an indiscriminate attack upon its inhabitants. His order "KILL EVERY ONE OVER TEN" became a caption in the New York Journal cartoon on May 5, 1902. The Old Glory draped an American shield on which a vulture replaced the bald eagle. The bottom caption exclaimed, "Criminals Because They Were Born Ten Years Before We Took the Philippines". Published in the New York Journal-American, May 5, 1902. Smith was eventually court-martialed by the American military and forced to retire.
The number of Filipino casualties was at the time, and still is, debated and politicized. It is estimated that some 34,000 Filipino soldiers lost their lives and that as many as 200,000 civilians may have died directly or indirectly as a result of the war, most due to a major cholera epidemic that broke out near its end.
In 1908 Manuel Arellano Remondo, in General Geography of the Philippine Islands, wrote: â€œThe population decreased due to the wars, in the five-year period from 1895 to 1900, since, at the start of the first insurrection, the population was estimated at 9,000,000, and at present (1908), the inhabitants of the Archipelago do not exceed 8,000,000 in number.â€ In light of the massive casualties suffered by the civilian population, Filipino historian E. San Juan, Jr., alleges that the death of 1.4 million Filipinos constitutes an act of genocide on the part of the United States.
Atrocities were committed on both sides. United States attacks into the countryside often included scorched earth campaigns in which entire villages were burned and destroyed, the use of torture (water cure) and the concentration of civilians into "protected zones". In November 1901, [b]the Manila correspondent of the Philadelphia Ledger reported:"The present war is no bloodless, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog...."
American soldiers' letters and response
Throughout the entire war American soldiers would write home about the horrors and atrocities which the United States committed in the Philippines. In these letters they would criticize General Otis and the U.S. military; when these letters reached anti-imperialist editors they became national news and forced the War Department to look into their truthfulness. Two of the letters went as follows:
A New York-born soldier: â€œThe town of Titatia [sic] was surrendered to us a few days ago, and two companies occupy the same. Last night one of our boys was found shot and his stomach cut open. Immediately orders were received from General Wheaton to burn the town and kill every native in sight; which was done to a finish. About 1,000 men, women and children were reported killed. I am probably growing hard-hearted, for I am in my glory when I can sight my gun on some dark skin and pull the trigger (Benevolent Assimilation, p. 88).â€
Corporal Sam Gillis: â€œWe make everyone get into his house by seven p.m., and we only tell a man once. If he refuses we shoot him. We killed over 300 natives the first night. They tried to set the town on fire. If they fire a shot from the house we burn the house down and every house near it, and shoot the natives, so they are pretty quiet in town now.â€
However, General Otisâ€™ investigation of the content of these letters consisted of sending a copy of them to the authorâ€™s superior and having him force the soldier/author to write a retraction. Then, when a soldier refused to do so, as Private Charles Brenner of the Kansas regiment did, he was, remarkably, court-martialed. In the case of Private Brenner, the charge was â€œfor writing and conniving at the publication of an article which...contains willful [sic] falsehoods concerning himself and a false charge against Captain Bishop.â€ This is not to say that all American soldiersâ€™ letters home explained the atrocities committed by the U.S. so as to bring about the American publicâ€™s and General Otisâ€™ displeasure. Many portrayed U.S. actions as the result of Filipino â€œinsurgentâ€ provocation and thus entirely justified. One such letter home was written by Private Hermann Dittner and was titled â€œthe trouble with the nigsâ€. It went as follows:
â€œIt then became apparent that a fight was imminent. So on February 3 we posted our sentry at the same old place. The insurgents kicked but without avail. Our colonel was down there and an insurgent called him a s â€“ n â€“ -b â€“ h. Of course this made Stotsenburg mad and he gave orders to arrest the lieutenant as soon as they could catch him.â€
Filipino villagers were forced into concentration camps called reconcentrados which were surrounded by free-fire zones, or in other words â€œdead zones.â€ Furthermore, these camps were overcrowded and filled with disease, causing the death rate to be extremely high. Conditions in these â€œreconcentradosâ€ are generally acknowledged to have been inhumane. Between January and April 1902, 8,350 prisoners of approximately 298,000 died. Some camps incurred death rates as high as 20 percent. "One camp was two miles by one mile (3.2 by 1.6 km) in area and 'home' to some 8,000 Filipinos. Men were rounded up for questioning, tortured, and summarily executed."
In Batangas Province, where General Franklin Bell was responsible for setting up a concentration camp, a correspondent described the operation as â€œrelentless.â€ General Bell ordered that by December 25, 1901, the entire population of both Batangas Province and Laguna Province had to gather into small areas within the â€œpoblacionâ€ of their respective towns. Barrio families had to bring everything they could carry because anything left behindâ€”including houses, gardens, carts, poultry and animalsâ€”was to be burned by the U.S. Army. Anyone found outside the concentration camps was shot. General Bell insisted that he had built these camps to "protect friendly natives from the insurgents, assure them an adequate food supply" while teaching them "proper sanitary standards." The commandant of one of the camps referred to them as the "suburbs of Hell.""
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine ... atrocities
So yes, the Japanese were obviously wrong in WWII, but it seems convenient for westerners to always try to cover up or not mention their own war crimes and also don't forget the fact that Japan was VERY westernized in every way... including tactics and the use of genocide/concentration camps/mass rapes, ideas that the racist/ethnicist Japanese got from studying how Americans dealt with the American Indians and how western Imperialists dealt with SE Asia and Africa.
I certainly don't agree with these types of methods.
As I said my grandfather was a leftist who wanted to see an Asian Union formed on equal terms based on treating other Asians no matter ethnicity as brothers and sisters of equal standing and no such racial hierarchy. This was also Sun Yat Sen's ideal.
This is obviously something that most westerners do NOT want, thus westerners do their best to divide and conquer and exploit old hostilities between different Asian ethnicities so that they can continue occupying East Asia and so that their men who cannot keep their dicks in their pants can go to Asia and f**k loose Japanese girls brainwashed by Hollywood and because Americans/anglo-western imperialists succeeded in poisoning the foods of Asia indirectly with unregulated pollution and Asian business owners who do not care enough about the environment as well as use of chemical and nuclear weapons that still affects East Asian lands today, thus successfully emasculating a large portion of the Asian male population.
And I call bullshit on any genetic/white supremacists here who say whites have superior genetics or whatever. Asian men are getting taller by the day, and most of the Asian guys I meet form Japan or Korea can put on muscle mas easily. It is all about diet. Not about genetics.
Also remember that whites/Europeans/caucasians were only 5'4" on average for the men, and the women even shorter back in the 1800s and pre-1700s when nutrition was still not as good and there was massive industrial revolution pollution. Asians had only went from medieval/reinaissance type societies to industrial/"modern" societies in the late 1800s, so of course physiologically they will be at a disadvantage, not to mention the malicious sabatoge by western imperialist/American Imperialist forces -> atomic bomb radiation, agent orange in vietnam, to ensure that this generation of Asians would have physical developmental problems.
This is all recorded in American/western military history as a way to subjugate the perceived "lesser races' "inferior" to the "anglo-saxon-Aryan" people.
Last edited by lone_yakuza on Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
That's easy. If the westerners in Asia respect the culture and do not look down on Asian men and do not hold the imperialist/white supremacist views/western supremacist views (in the case of non-white westerners or self hating asian men), then they should not be kicked out. It's about treating people equally without this racial overtone of racial hierarchy that is so painfully obvious both in the international political stage/international media/Hollywood, and at the individual level.
I know tons of white guys who are liberal, intelligent, non-hateful, and embrace all cultures, while still being proud of their own European culture.
These kinds of men are more than welcome in Asia.
However, the anglo/western/white Americans or Europeans who look down on Asian men or speak in a condescending way or think they are genetically/physically superior and go to Asia to "conquer" women, these people do not deserve to be there, especially because the reason Asians have so much to catch up on, especially physically, is because of chemical/nuclear warfare inflicted by the west and pollution from industrialization (both the west's and asians' own fautl) combined with inferior nutrition due to the local foods/diets and in some cases, hundreds of years of famine and malnutrition. But if you look at Korea and Japan, with the more westernized diets, many of the men are much taller/bigger, and just as tall as the tallest Americans. This is due to diet, not genetics.
Remember that Asia has to catch up after having only become more "modern" since the mid 1900s. So that is 100+ more years of malnutrition we have to deal with or famine.
Also remember that Europeans were just as "small and weak", the average height of a man being 5'4" during the middle ages until the late renaissance/early industrial revolution when there was more food and also the fact that high dairy intake meant lots of calcium, critical for height growth, and meats critical for muscle.
Also, you cannot unite when one of the races in question (whites) view you in a condescending manner and are the ones doing the racist thinking/thinking you are less masculine or whatever due to bullshit genetic reasons that are unproven and only apparent because of the differences in nutrition and diet and the fact that Asians have yet to have good nutrition for the same amount of time.
I'm not the one that started the war. They did. They started it in the 1800s and have been waging both the psychological and conventional/chemical/nuclear/cultural war against Asian males since that time. And most do not want to stop, even if there are a few good voices of reason. Also most women have already been poisoned by popular culture against Asian males. The only way we can change this is through regaining our dignity and pride in Asia.
Where does that put you? That depends on your views about world geopolitics, imperialism, etc. But like the way the Europeans have the European union, Asians need an Asian union, and Asian males, especially Japanese, need to regain their lost dignity, regain their military, apologize to China and Korea, and become brothers in arms. Like Sun Yat Sen envisioned almost 100 years ago.
Yakuza, I don't disagree with a lot of what you are saying, but it is hard for me to wrap my head around considering my multiracial background. I don't know how to interpret it. Anyway, it just seems like people have short memories for history. It's written by victors after all. What's hard for me too is that as much as I hate imperialism I recognize the accomplishments of Western culture during the,renaissance and the enlightenment. During the 20th century, America developed the light bulb, airplanes, etc. In my examinations of history, at least recently I have taken a more geographic approach to things. I won't deny exploitation, but I do not accept Marxist interpretations. I think certain societies were just more vulnerable because of geography or climate. No matter what culture or race you observe, a tribe at the bottom of a mountain will be more successful than one on top. Western Europe was able to develop more than Eastern Europe because the climate was more temperate and there were mineral deposits necessary for the Industrial Revolution. Africa South of the Sahara is littered with plateaus making widespread trade very hard and nomadism essential. You can't build a great society out of nomads. The coast of Africa is also very shallow, so ships couldn't dock as easily, preventing international trade. The Native Americans over hunted and killed all the horses. They didn't have oxen either, so that severely limited their personal mobility and ability to transport raw materials. These cultures simply had arrested development. Obviously others such as China and at various times the Middle East have been more successful. But Africa South of the Sahara and the Native Americans have always suffered. Under this interpretation, the most racist of all is God.
Except that the "more civilized" or more "developed" civilizations like China or Japan, as you put it are still largely viewed as subhuman or inferior by western/white supremacists, many of whom post on these boards, and they cite physiological differences without realizing that western affluence/ability to be tall and have plenty of food and be able to bodybuild or whatnot... is because they get all that food and good nutrition by exploiting and stomping down other places around the world. Just like why America goes to war... to make a profit and exert control over the globe. This is in our American miltary doctrine, straight out of one of my Reserve Officer Training Corps textbooks. And much of the psychological warfare/chemical warfare,etc. is also straight out of some of these texts, though some of them are obviously written by someone on the far right.
Maybe some imperialists did good by introducing technology or hygiene, but it does not justify the racial hierarchy you still see in today's interactions, especially when places like China, Japan, and Korea have been civilized for up to 5000 years and have continued their culture for that long (or 2000 in the case of Japan and Korea), and these civilizations were far more advanced that Europeans ever were before the Europeans adopted many Eastern technologies like gunpowder, paper, etc., then used those weapons later on to stomp East Asia down.
There was a reason that East Asia limited development of firearms/gunpowder weaponry.. becuase they recognized its potential for creating wars that are much more deadly, and the pacifist nature of many of its Buddhism influenced scholars. Same thing can be said for Japan which developed very advanced guns in theh 1600s but stopped development, both because the Samurai viewed it as cowardly to use those sorts of weapons, and the Samurai did not want to lose their position at the top of society.
Had Asia had a more militant philospohy such as the crusader philosophy of Europe, and continued developing gunpowder weaponry, this world would be the yellow man's world. Not hte white man's. They would have followed Ghengis Khan's work and marched west not with bows, arrows, and cavalry, kbut with giant cannons, machine guns, etc. and would have wiped Europe off teh face of the earth.
But in buddhist teaching, there is a saying that "the five colors -> white, yellow, black, red, brown are merely distractions and that the inner soul of all men are essentially the same and can reach enlightenment" or something along those lines.
Contrast that with christian rhetoric which emphasizes killing/genocide of "heathens" and those "not like them."
But yes, if the Christian god exists or any god exists, how I wish I could go to heaven and kill him with mine own hands for being such a malevolent god and creating such injustice and unfairness on earth for humanity.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests