Pardon Me Feminist?

[djfourmoney]

I posted in blog by Evan Marc Katz about this post he wrote about being 40 and women in their 30's not being interested in him.

When I laid out the stark reality, the feminist jumped on me, called me names and all sort of typical feminist ad-homin attacks.

You can read the entire blog post and comments here - http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/online ... nt-5836075

Three years later women are still taking issue with my comments.

This last one is sad and she's looking for a sucker -

You need to do some research. Yes, there is some risk, but how badly do you want to really fall in love with the future mother of your child(ren)? I am 40 and have known I was clinically infertile since I was 35. I already know what I’m up against – which means I already know I cannot use my own eggs to become pregnant. I am otherwise healthy and although pregnancy and childbirth will carry some risk, the genetic risk factor is out. And yet, I want a man who loves me enough and wants a child badly enough to support me in getting donor eggs or adopting embryos so I may become a mother. I’m 40 – not 50. There is still time with the help of science and good health. You never know until you try to conceive what you may be up against. You or the OP could meet your ideal 32-year-old, fall in love, and find out she will have trouble or need help conceiving. You’re both 42. Stop getting caught up in the fertility factor, as infertility is QUITE common among all ages of men and women. For that matter, how do YOU know you’re swimmers are good and healthy? I would LOVE to start a family with a 42-year-old man. But most I meet have decided to remain childless or decided they’re done with the number they already have. I think it’s far more important to find the woman who views being a parent in the future as important a goal as you do…. THEN worry about HOW you’re going to get there later, if you have to worry about it all.

So men should be willing spend money on her inability to find a man for 20 years? Or what has likely what's been happening; a constant rejection of good men while pursuing men who don't take her seriously as wife material.

The highlighted sentence is extremely unlikely, especially if she's not a smoker, heavy drinker, drug abuser or works job that isn't stressful.

But our environment makes the possibility of difficult child birth/conception a reality and is all the more reason Men if should only consider women under 34 if your serious about having children.

Scrolling down the comments I found this stupid link - http://nycyclist.kinja.com/men-stop-usi ... 1489185452

Really?

If you dudes need more reasons to press the eject button on dating in this country I don't know what will finally push you to change your reality.

[MrMan]

If you had a choice between buying a new car or a used car at the same price, which one would you go for?

That's a good analogy for marrying a virgin, too. Whether an old woman or a young one, or a virgin or nonvirgin, the price is your bachelorhood.

How about this, if you want to marry a young fertile woman, go find one, marry her, and don't care what these women think. Some of them wasted away their prime fertile marrying years by focusing on career, pursuing men who weren't interested in marriage, or just repelled men by being feminists.

If they care that you don't want someone like them, take it as a complement.

[djfourmoney]

If you had a choice between buying a new car or a used car at the same price, which one would you go for?

That's a good analogy for marrying a virgin, too. Whether an old woman or a young one, or a virgin or nonvirgin, the price is your bachelorhood.

How about this, if you want to marry a young fertile woman, go find one, marry her, and don't care what these women think. Some of them wasted away their prime fertile marrying years by focusing on career, pursuing men who weren't interested in marriage, or just repelled men by being feminists.

If they care that you don't want someone like them, take it as a complement.

Actually I don't mind these sorts of interactions.

Virgins are overrated; while they have nothing sexually to compare you with that doesn't mean you can't have a meaningful and loving relationship with woman with some mileage on her odometer.

New vs Used is improper analogy actually. Technically a Certified Pre-Owned car is a lease return, cared for by the local brand dealer for all schedule work and maintenance.

If were going to use analogies than a CPO is a well-educated, attractive and selective woman who has just been unlucky generally. This is more than possible since while we like to blame women around here, I just can't believe the gender war is all one-sided because it isn't.

It's just amazing to me how many American men are still willing to date these women especially if they are over 40.

[Jester]

Scrolling down the comments I found this stupid link - http://nycyclist.kinja.com/men-stop-usi ... 1489185452

Thanks, gonna quote the golden sperm guy on my other thread about White Women

[Jester]

http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/online ... nt-5836075

To a 34 year old woman, 42 sounds OLD.

[Teal Lantern]

So men should be willing spend money on her inability to find a man for 20 years? Or what has likely what's been happening; a constant rejection of good men while pursuing men who don't take her seriously as wife material.

Upstart men who wanted to get married before she'd had her fun were "too serious".
Stable men who don't want to now fund project 30-something-Party-Girl's-Retirement-Plan are
~ "insecure, Peter Pans, wanting someone who's easier to control" and "disgusted by signs of ageing that you yourself have".

Well, I myself also have hairy balls. Am I required to seek the same in a partner?

The overarching attitude is whatever she wants to do, right now, there should be a man ready to agree and pay for it.
In the good old days, there WOULD be a few wallets waiting around to be "settled" for, after she'd "had her fun" and was ready for project picket fence & baby.
It was a plan that had worked well, for decades. Uppity wallets are now taking their marbles over to SEA, EE, the islands, or refusing to play at all.

Oh, well. She wants kids, she can always adopt.

[Maverick]

I posted in blog by Evan Marc Katz about this post he wrote about being 40 and women in their 30's not being interested in him.

When I laid out the stark reality, the feminist jumped on me, called me names and all sort of typical feminist ad-homin attacks.

You can read the entire blog post and comments here - http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/online ... nt-5836075

Three years later women are still taking issue with my comments.

This last one is sad and she's looking for a sucker -

You need to do some research. Yes, there is some risk, but how badly do you want to really fall in love with the future mother of your child(ren)? I am 40 and have known I was clinically infertile since I was 35. I already know what I’m up against – which means I already know I cannot use my own eggs to become pregnant. I am otherwise healthy and although pregnancy and childbirth will carry some risk, the genetic risk factor is out. And yet, I want a man who loves me enough and wants a child badly enough to support me in getting donor eggs or adopting embryos so I may become a mother. I’m 40 – not 50. There is still time with the help of science and good health. You never know until you try to conceive what you may be up against. You or the OP could meet your ideal 32-year-old, fall in love, and find out she will have trouble or need help conceiving. You’re both 42. Stop getting caught up in the fertility factor, as infertility is QUITE common among all ages of men and women. For that matter, how do YOU know you’re swimmers are good and healthy? I would LOVE to start a family with a 42-year-old man. But most I meet have decided to remain childless or decided they’re done with the number they already have. I think it’s far more important to find the woman who views being a parent in the future as important a goal as you do…. THEN worry about HOW you’re going to get there later, if you have to worry about it all.

So men should be willing spend money on her inability to find a man for 20 years? Or what has likely what's been happening; a constant rejection of good men while pursuing men who don't take her seriously as wife material.

The highlighted sentence is extremely unlikely, especially if she's not a smoker, heavy drinker, drug abuser or works job that isn't stressful.

But our environment makes the possibility of difficult child birth/conception a reality and is all the more reason Men if should only consider women under 34 if your serious about having children.

Scrolling down the comments I found this stupid link - http://nycyclist.kinja.com/men-stop-usi ... 1489185452

Really?

If you dudes need more reasons to press the eject button on dating in this country I don't know what will finally push you to change your reality.

I wouldn't sweat that blog too much. I've read it before. From what I gather, he's a dating coach for women, meaning that he's a p***y and panders to women.

I would avoid that blog and focus on better ones. They are out there.

[Jester]

Well, I myself also have hairy balls. Am I required to seek the same in a partner?

+5

PS TMI

PS

[djfourmoney]

I posted in blog by Evan Marc Katz about this post he wrote about being 40 and women in their 30's not being interested in him.

When I laid out the stark reality, the feminist jumped on me, called me names and all sort of typical feminist ad-homin attacks.

You can read the entire blog post and comments here - http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/online ... nt-5836075

Three years later women are still taking issue with my comments.

This last one is sad and she's looking for a sucker -

You need to do some research. Yes, there is some risk, but how badly do you want to really fall in love with the future mother of your child(ren)? I am 40 and have known I was clinically infertile since I was 35. I already know what I’m up against – which means I already know I cannot use my own eggs to become pregnant. I am otherwise healthy and although pregnancy and childbirth will carry some risk, the genetic risk factor is out. And yet, I want a man who loves me enough and wants a child badly enough to support me in getting donor eggs or adopting embryos so I may become a mother. I’m 40 – not 50. There is still time with the help of science and good health. You never know until you try to conceive what you may be up against. You or the OP could meet your ideal 32-year-old, fall in love, and find out she will have trouble or need help conceiving. You’re both 42. Stop getting caught up in the fertility factor, as infertility is QUITE common among all ages of men and women. For that matter, how do YOU know you’re swimmers are good and healthy? I would LOVE to start a family with a 42-year-old man. But most I meet have decided to remain childless or decided they’re done with the number they already have. I think it’s far more important to find the woman who views being a parent in the future as important a goal as you do…. THEN worry about HOW you’re going to get there later, if you have to worry about it all.

So men should be willing spend money on her inability to find a man for 20 years? Or what has likely what's been happening; a constant rejection of good men while pursuing men who don't take her seriously as wife material.

The highlighted sentence is extremely unlikely, especially if she's not a smoker, heavy drinker, drug abuser or works job that isn't stressful.

But our environment makes the possibility of difficult child birth/conception a reality and is all the more reason Men if should only consider women under 34 if your serious about having children.

Scrolling down the comments I found this stupid link - http://nycyclist.kinja.com/men-stop-usi ... 1489185452

Really?

If you dudes need more reasons to press the eject button on dating in this country I don't know what will finally push you to change your reality.

I wouldn't sweat that blog too much. I've read it before. From what I gather, he's a dating coach for women, meaning that he's a p***y and panders to women.

I would avoid that blog and focus on better ones. They are out there.

It's funny, I found that blog years ago when I found another blog post from a woman to was trying to tell women to get married and have your children before 30.

[Maverick]

I posted in blog by Evan Marc Katz about this post he wrote about being 40 and women in their 30's not being interested in him.

When I laid out the stark reality, the feminist jumped on me, called me names and all sort of typical feminist ad-homin attacks.

You can read the entire blog post and comments here - http://www.evanmarckatz.com/blog/online ... nt-5836075

Three years later women are still taking issue with my comments.

This last one is sad and she's looking for a sucker -

You need to do some research. Yes, there is some risk, but how badly do you want to really fall in love with the future mother of your child(ren)? I am 40 and have known I was clinically infertile since I was 35. I already know what I’m up against – which means I already know I cannot use my own eggs to become pregnant. I am otherwise healthy and although pregnancy and childbirth will carry some risk, the genetic risk factor is out. And yet, I want a man who loves me enough and wants a child badly enough to support me in getting donor eggs or adopting embryos so I may become a mother. I’m 40 – not 50. There is still time with the help of science and good health. You never know until you try to conceive what you may be up against. You or the OP could meet your ideal 32-year-old, fall in love, and find out she will have trouble or need help conceiving. You’re both 42. Stop getting caught up in the fertility factor, as infertility is QUITE common among all ages of men and women. For that matter, how do YOU know you’re swimmers are good and healthy? I would LOVE to start a family with a 42-year-old man. But most I meet have decided to remain childless or decided they’re done with the number they already have. I think it’s far more important to find the woman who views being a parent in the future as important a goal as you do…. THEN worry about HOW you’re going to get there later, if you have to worry about it all.

So men should be willing spend money on her inability to find a man for 20 years? Or what has likely what's been happening; a constant rejection of good men while pursuing men who don't take her seriously as wife material.

The highlighted sentence is extremely unlikely, especially if she's not a smoker, heavy drinker, drug abuser or works job that isn't stressful.

But our environment makes the possibility of difficult child birth/conception a reality and is all the more reason Men if should only consider women under 34 if your serious about having children.

Scrolling down the comments I found this stupid link - http://nycyclist.kinja.com/men-stop-usi ... 1489185452

Really?

If you dudes need more reasons to press the eject button on dating in this country I don't know what will finally push you to change your reality.

I wouldn't sweat that blog too much. I've read it before. From what I gather, he's a dating coach for women, meaning that he's a p***y and panders to women.

I would avoid that blog and focus on better ones. They are out there.

It's funny, I found that blog years ago when I found another blog post from a woman to was trying to tell women to get married and have your children before 30.

Well, I don't know how long that blog has been around for. I found it last year and was disgusted with the feminist rhetoric that I found there.

It's possible that it used to be good, but has since changed. I've noticed this with a lot of sites over the past few years. I first started going on forums occasionally in 2007 (and, then, it was mostly PUA sites). Even PUA sites have changed significantly since then and cater to PC feminist bullshit. The ones that didn't have mostly shut down. So it's not a surprise that this guy would completely change his viewpoints on things.