LOL who are you trying to fool Droid?droid wrote:Flight time is obviously neglected. Geez you produce more junk than anyone has time to keep up with.Winston wrote:Everyone,
Here are some details about flights in the southern hemisphere of the earth that will shock you and make your jaw drop. This is from eric dubays ebook "200 proofs earth is not a spinning ball".
43) If Earth was a ball there are several flights in the Southern hemisphere which would have their quickest, straightest path over the Antarctic continent such as Santiago, Chile to Sydney, Australia. Instead of taking the shortest, quickest route in a straight line over Antarctica, all such flights detour all manner of directions away from Antarctica instead claiming the temperatures too cold for airplane travel! Considering the fact that there are plenty of flights to/from/over Antarctica, and NASA claims to have technology keeping them in conditions far colder (and far hotter) than any experienced on Earth, such an excuse is clearly just an excuse, and these flights aren’t made because they are impossible.
44) If Earth was a ball, and Antarctica was too cold to fly over, the only logical way to fly from Sydney to Santiago would be a straight shot over the Pacific staying in the Southern hemisphere the entire way. Re-fueling could be done in New Zealand or other Southern hemisphere destinations along the way if absolutely necessary. In actual fact, however, Santiago-Sydney flights go into the Northern hemisphere making stop-overs at LAX and other North American airports before continuing back down to the Southern hemisphere. Such ridiculously wayward detours make no sense on the globe but make perfect sense and form nearly straight lines when shown on a flat Earth map.
45) On a ball-Earth, Johannesburg, South Africa to Perth, Australia should be a straight shot over the Indian Ocean with convenient re-fueling possibilities on Mauritus or Madagascar. In actual practice, however, most Johannesburg to Perth flights curiously stop over either in Dubai, Hong Kong or Malaysia all of which make no sense on the ball, but are completely understandable when mapped on a flat Earth.
46) On a ball-Earth Cape Town, South Africa to Buenos Aries, Argentina should be a straight shot over the Atlantic following the same line of latitude across, but instead every flight goes to connecting locations in the Northern hemisphere first, stopping over anywhere from London to Turkey to Dubai. Once again these make absolutely no sense on the globe but are completely understandable options when mapped on a flat Earth.
47) On a ball-Earth Johannesburg, South Africa to Sao Paolo, Brazil should be a quick straight shot along the 25th Southern latitude, but instead nearly every flight makes a refueling stop at the 50th degree North latitude in London first! The only reason such a ridiculous stop-over works in reality is because the Earth is flat.
48) On a ball-Earth Santiago, Chile to Johannesburg, South Africa should be an easy flight all taking place below the Tropic of Capricorn in the Southern hemisphere, yet every listed flight makes a curious re-fueling stop in Senegal near the Tropic of Cancer in the North hemisphere first! When mapped on a flat Earth the reason why is clear to see, however, Senegal is actually directly in a straight-line path half-way between the two.
Here, Sydney to Santiago, 11h:30m nonstop:
https://www.expedia.com/Flights-Search? ... Search-All
With videos (of course "fake", or "made by insiders")
This thread here handles this
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/foru ... lo1INKrSHs
Also, no flight between capitals or major cities has to go over antarctica. Own up to your bullshit dudes:
Firstly, your image above of Antarctica is bogus. The majority of maps of Antarctica show it to be much bigger than that and closer to the continents above it. Who drew that sloppy map you posted above? It sucks. Go to Google images and look for a more accurate map.
Second, your URL works against you. Look again:
https://www.expedia.com/Flights-Search? ... Search-All
It lists many flights to choose from between Sydney and Santiago. Notice that all of them involve ONE STOP except one. And the price of these flights is over $3,000. Who you trying to fool? Why did you post a link that works against your argument? LOL. Are you trying to shoot yourself in the foot?
It could be that the one nonstop flight is a shill. Remember that a nonstop flight can include a refueling stop, according to aviation law. Technically, a refueling stop doesn't count as a real stop. Also, the extremely high price of $3,000 makes it too expensive for most except the rich. So they are perhaps counting on hardly anyone taking that flight? lol
. You're too invested in the skepticism for the sake of it, whereas a true skeptic is skeptic of the conspiracy theo itself too; What if you're the one being brainwashed for a further agenda you can't even imagine with the information you have?
