The_Adventurer wrote:
Interesting that you mention, though in a derogatory way, herbivore men. Japan doesn't have feminism, certainly not in the western sense, and yet the Herbivore phenomenon is much larger than any MGTOW in the west. It seems to be largely the result of circumstance. It just "happened" little by little. Those who seem so against MGTOW seem to think it is entirely about choice. Of course, everything is when you boil it down, but that likes saying some guy is a p***y because he won't jump into this alligator pit.
So one must get a good education, choose one equally educated, plan the kids, discuss the cults, make all these compromises... since when was marriage so much hassle. I tend to think it was not like this in the previous generations. Of course divorce use to be a shame back then, now it is something to be celebrated. Marriage used to be a benefit to a man. I suspect it was to a woman too, though modern society would have us believe differently. Today it really is wholly unnecessary.
Don't get me wrong, I see nothing wrong with adapting to the modern world, making compromises, or whatever, to be married if that is what one wants. As with Herbivore men, I don't think anyone should be surprised if more and more men simply don't want that, or see any benefit to it.
I wasn't being derogatory, I was being descriptive.
"without being bound by manliness"
"weak and not masculine"
"concentrate on personal grooming"
I've read up on them before and they come across as faggy. Not all of them of course but still.
I would not call getting an education and finding someone educated to be a hassle myself, also I suspect it isn't the education that makes the difference so much as it being a marker for other traits. as for planing the kids, cults and finance, FFS getting into a life long commitment with someone without having those things in agreement is just marriage suicide, playing life on hard more. It is also a hassle to eat right, put on a seat belt and get exercise but it is still a good idea.
Divorce used to be a shame back then. Being stuck with a nagging hag of a wife or being used as a punching bag by hubby was so much better?
Marriage is still a benefit. However it isn't a benefit if you consider putting more effort in picking a wife than a car to be too much of a hassle. As far as I am concerned a healthy marriage is a prerequisite if you want to raise kids, if you don't have one, you should not be having the other. If you don't want kids, there is still value in life time commitment but I guess not if you [you general not you quoted poster] just want to knock up some chick and abandon her.
I think folks would be better off under these changed in mind set.
1: No kids unless you have a healthy functioning marriage. Not just the paper but one that works.
2: Take dating seriously. Dr Laura Shitslinger might of been two faced and a bit nutty but she did deliver nuggets of truth and one of them was, you can't marry who you don't date. In her context, smoking but it applies elsewhere. Most people meet someone start dating but don't care about long term because it is just dating. Then they fall in love and get married. However love is necessary but it isn't all that is needed. If you are dating someone, people should ask the important questions before things get too serious. Look up some of the lists for those getting arranged married. It seems it is more important that one shares similar tastes in music or movies than in fundamental life style issues that although unimportant at the start of a relationship because vital when things get serious. I knew a couple, girl wanted no kids, dude wanted 6. Someone is going to be very unhappy, it is just a time bomb ticking away.
3: If you find someone who is compatible, put in the effort to keep the marriage going strong. Be willing to compromise and sensible. However one should also accept the other person as is and not be a nag about it. Know when to apply which. But hey, hassle meh. Be willing to do that, and find someone willing to do that for you.