The Flipside of Feminism

[zboy1]

I urge anyone to read this book by Phyllis Schlafly and Suzanne Venker. It describes the lies that feminists propagate in the media and how much damage it has done to American and Western society.

Here are a couple of radio interviews if you are interested in hearing:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar ... f-feminism


http://radioboston.wbur.org/2011/03/18/suzanne-venker


http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/fami ... 94970.html


And a Youtube video:

[Grunt]

I have said for a year or so that marriage rates are the benchmark of feminism.

The old for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction routine.

As feminism grown, marriage rates fall. As feminists approach complete control of society, marriage rates plummet to the lowest in history.

But without marriage, feminism itself becomes non-functional. With no enemy, an army has no reason to exist. Thus, with no men to blame everything on, feminism collapses.

An analogy I have used is this; The good news is, feminists have taken control of the ship of state. The bad news is, we hit an iceberg and the men have quietly sailed off in the lifeboats.

Another thing I have noticed in since the recession started in 2008 is the men on YouTube are now fully aware. I think 10 years ago most men on YouTube or the internet in general would leap to defend any female being confronted with reality and truth. Now 90% of the men on YouTube are schooling feminists harshly, which is exactly what they need.

Men have won the so called "battle of the sexes", but we hardly put any effort into it, we just stopped showing up at the alter. Was a bad fight for the feminists to pick, and now they are paying the price.

I have no problem with any of it.

[DaRick]

Does anyone benefit from feminism in the longer-term? I'd say not - the more conspiracy-minded would say the elite because they can grab more power as the masses become more stupid, but good luck trying to rule over a mob of sociopaths. It's not a job I would want to take on.

[odbo]

Does anyone benefit from feminism in the longer-term? I'd say not - the more conspiracy-minded would say the elite because they can grab more power as the masses become more stupid, but good luck trying to rule over a mob of sociopaths. It's not a job I would want to take on.

More "conspiracy-minded" is a nice dysphemism for more "intelligent"

BTW I just bought this book! I entered a bookstore and went to the back looking for the restroom. I saw a scruffy looking hardcover laying there with a damaged dust jacket. I picked it up at recognized the name from this thread. Maybe some angry woman tried to damage and hide it so no one would buy it. I normally download my books for free and read them on my ebook reader as I'm trying to save money to move abroad, but I couldn't ignore this syncronicity. And I got the book at a discount from the full $25.95

[djfourmoney]

I urge anyone to read this book by Phyllis Schlafly and Suzanne Venker. It describes the lies that feminists propagate in the media and how much damage it has done to American and Western society.

Here are a couple of radio interviews if you are interested in hearing:

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/markgillar ... f-feminism


http://radioboston.wbur.org/2011/03/18/suzanne-venker


http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/fami ... 94970.html


And a Youtube video:

I brought this to the attention of the forum a few months back. I agree in principle with the premise of the book. That said Schlafy is apart of the Crazy Train on the Right/Republican side of any debate.

So I'm not overjoyed to support her.

[djfourmoney]

I have said for a year or so that marriage rates are the benchmark of feminism.

The old for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction routine.

As feminism grown, marriage rates fall. As feminists approach complete control of society, marriage rates plummet to the lowest in history.

But without marriage, feminism itself becomes non-functional. With no enemy, an army has no reason to exist. Thus, with no men to blame everything on, feminism collapses.

An analogy I have used is this; The good news is, feminists have taken control of the ship of state. The bad news is, we hit an iceberg and the men have quietly sailed off in the lifeboats.

Another thing I have noticed in since the recession started in 2008 is the men on YouTube are now fully aware. I think 10 years ago most men on YouTube or the internet in general would leap to defend any female being confronted with reality and truth. Now 90% of the men on YouTube are schooling feminists harshly, which is exactly what they need.

Men have won the so called "battle of the sexes", but we hardly put any effort into it, we just stopped showing up at the alter. Was a bad fight for the feminists to pick, and now they are paying the price.

I have no problem with any of it.

I think your right. A reduction of wages and elimination of Unions are detrimental to both sexes and children. Most of the layoffs happen with people working jobs that men typically do, construction & manufacturing - http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t14.htm

That graph proves the Stimulus worked, it reduced employment in most sectors, but we still have 25 Million (Including this poster) Unemployed or Under-Employed (reduced wages, zero benefits or reduced hours, optional benefits) or about 16% Unemployment as they don't count under-employed, 99er's and those that have given up.

This is going to stop Feminism in its tracks though, because if its allowed to increase in sway, we'll have a recovery like Japan, which hasn't grown much at all the last decade or more. Germany bailed out its banks (bad idea) but put a floor under employment. Almost three years later, most of the country has unemployment rates below 7% and can afford to bail out the PIIGS if it so desires and might do with the help of the next biggest economy, France.