Winston wrote:
Why don't you just attack him on his own site, crimesagainstfathers? Why don't you go there instead of here? That site is still up.
Hi Winston,
CAF is hosted in the US and I have a good relationship with the hoster having been a client for 7 years. When I hosted CAF I wrote to their legal department and put the question to them about hosting sensitive content. Their response was that they observed the first ammendment and would not take down any content due to any complaint made. They told me that if a court order arrives asking to remove content they will forward the court order to me.
I told them that I take responsibility for what I post and the men who post there will be held accountable for what THEY post.
This is the agreement between the hosters and I.
Also CAF is hosted under common law as the US is a common law land. This means that court orders have no lawful standing.
And they have tried attacking my site. Posters join and put rubbish on CAF and I remove it again. Happens on a relatively infrequent basis as they realise there is no real point to doing it.
Harvey is one more ASIO agent telling lies. He has already been caught telling a blatant lie. I would recommend he be banned and removed.
The more important question for men to ponder in a place like this is...
"Why does ASIO even use such a blatant method of dis-information as telling lies like this? And why does it work with so many men?"
Those are very good questions for men to ponder because it points to the fundamentals of the problem. Men will believe lies just through repetition and the desire to see someone lied about...very few men seek the truth.....
By the way? I am told that the feds in Australia know full well that my video is blocked into Australia but no feds have got the guts to reveal themselves to me by name as they know I will put them on their oath and then nail them for aiding and abetting known criminals. No feds want to talk to me. No members of parliament either but they can not avoid me and a well known.
The reason that my video is not taken down is that I wrote to Eric Schmidt and told him that if he allowed it to be taken down again he would be personally charged with obstruction of the course of justice. I have written to Eric a number of times. I am now including Larry Page and Sergy Brin as addressees to these letters.
Eric is now going to be served a notice to claim USD500,000 in copyright infringment for the use of my calling on the ASIO hate site that he has refused to have taken down and the persistence of my calling in google searches after he has been noticed of the copyright. He is also going to be served a notice for USD50,000 in damages for allowing a colleague of mine to be slandered on the hate site. He was slandered as a paedophile. I think Eric has more than enough money to pay out USD550,000 in such damages.
Should he not pay the damages he will be put on trial and the jury can decide the damages. Since Eric is a BILLIONAIRE I rather think the jury will take a dim view of his refusal to remove slanderous materials from his web sites.