Warning: This forum operates on the principles of truth, free speech and freethought without politically correct censorship.

Happier Abroad Forum Index
  Forum Community of Global Daters, Expats and Freethinkers

RegisterSearchFAQMemberlistUsergroupsIgnore ListBan PanelLog in




Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes
and Bud Patterson, author of Foreign Bride 101 Mon/Wed nights 9:30 EST for FREE Call-In Conferences!
New! Don't miss AFA's new TV reality show Bachelors Abroad on National Geographic! See Trailer clip


Why do people say Christian Filipina is better than Filipino Cupid? Because it is.






Try this! View Latest 100 Topics          View Your Posts         FAQ Topics          Mobile App
Share |
Reply to topic Page 2 of 2
Goto page Previous  1, 2
UK nanny state bans Self Defense Guru
Author Message
Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
gsjackson wrote:
Please direct me to the statute or tenet of common law to which you are referring, and I will believe you. Otherwise, I don't.


This appears to be the legislative section.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/4/section/76

To get the actual law how it is actually practiced, you have to do a study of the case law. Tim Larkin talks about it in the videos I posted, and he claims that his advocacy of change of self-defense laws in England was why he was banned.

He was invited to speak in Birmingham and Tottenham, two areas that had riots.

A person keeps a fire extinguisher in his house in case of a fire. So, by your measure, if he never had a fire in his life, he was paranoid. If you don't want to defend yourself, it's not a problem with me.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18002220

View user's profile Send private message





Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
Well then the case law, to even begin to support the statement you made, would have to cut in the precise opposite direction of what the statute says. The statute, if you didn't read it, makes very clear that self defense and prevention of a crime are legitimate actions. And just your own belief that you were acting reasonably in coming to the aid of another person creates a presumption that you were acting reasonably.



Last edited by gsjackson on Sun May 27, 2012 12:47 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
Larkin can spin and trim now as much as he wants about the "rare, black swan occasions" when lethal force might be necessary, but the story I read when it was breaking news said that this guy is all about crippling and killing people. That's his calling card, and that's why he was banned.

I don't know how many times it's been said on this site (correctly in my view) that law enforcement types, including self defense gurus, are just the flip side of criminals. Same sorts of motivation, same kinds of perverse thrill seeking. I don't blame Britain for wanting to make sure the whole stinking culture stays over here. They probably have fewer murders in a year than the country you live in, Mexico, has on the average day. That's because they take pains to make it that way, including keeping the American wild west culture away.

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
gsjackson wrote:
Larkin can spin and trim now as much as he wants about the "rare, black swan occasions" when lethal force might be necessary, but the story I read when it was breaking news said that this guy is all about crippling and killing people. That's his calling card, and that's why he was banned.

west culture away.


I have reviewed his material and haven't found anything that even hints of vigilantism. The stories were propagated by a sensationalist press, which is popular in England. They even called him a navy seal, which he is not. They can't even get the basic facts straight so why do you believe them? His material is responsible self defense. He advocates different levels of force in different situations, and yes, in the rare situation that you hopefully will never face, it will be either you kill him or he kills you, and lethal force will be necessary. The fact that he was invited there by people concerned for their well being contradicts your claim of safety. Please provide the quotes from his material that backs up your claims that his program is irresponsible is some way.

View user's profile Send private message
Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
I don't know whether the press misconstrued his approach or not. If you've reviewed his material and say that they have, then that is a case where I will take your word for it. Your views are typically pretty measured, and generally you get a presumption of credibility from me. But not when you say something that is obviously wrong, such as it is illegal in Britain to defend victims of crime, or indulge in the usual careless use of the word socialism. The case against Britain as a nanny state will have to be made more carefully than that.

Whatever Larkin may be, he's certainly a typical American. He's already incorporated the ban into his advertising. Hey, any pub is good pub, right?

http://www.targetfocustraining.com/

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Reply with quote Add User to Ignore List
Post  
gsjackson wrote:
Whatever Larkin may be, he's certainly a typical American. He's already incorporated the ban into his advertising. Hey, any pub is good pub, right?


I guess he knows Jiu Jitsu.

View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:
Reply to topic Page 2 of 2
Goto page Previous  1, 2
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  



Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum Replies Posted
No new posts Canadian Minister of Defense disscuss... Renata News and Current Events 4 Fri Jun 07, 2013 12:35 pm View latest post
No new posts Government bans public kissing Renata News and Current Events 7 Tue Jun 04, 2013 11:48 am View latest post
No new posts Canadian Minister for Defense Alien D... PeterAndrewNolan General Discussions 2 Mon Jun 03, 2013 4:16 am View latest post
No new posts The social and economic state of the ... clowny General Discussions 15 Mon May 13, 2013 7:37 am View latest post
No new posts State Defense Forces Taco Government, Politics, Law 1 Wed May 08, 2013 4:42 am View latest post