Discuss and talk about any general topic.
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Why does feminism exist? What caused/causes it?
Should we not treat feminism as a sickness that needs treatment? In the same way a drug addict needs help and treatment, instead of declaring war on drugs/feminism we should think of it as a disease and show sympathy to its sufferers?
There must be a reason these women are so angry? Who or what made them so? Their environment? Society?
Just a thought.
Last edited by ryanx on Fri Apr 12, 2013 8:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
Special Offer! FREE 6 Month Membership on ForeignWomen.com! Sign up here.
New! Chinaebuys - Buy & Ship any Product from China to Worldwide! Taobao Shipping Agent.
Feminism is caused by selfishness, which is caused by immorality, which was caused in our culture by the Christian revival movement in the 1800s which removed moral requirements from Christianity. The only cure is a sound moral religion.
Following the Old Testament, not evil modern culture
The problem is moral relativism a.k.a. post-modernism, which has been the predominant philosophical field of inquiry since the 60's. Before that was modernism, which was criticized as having fascist tendencies.
"Nihilists! f**k me. I mean, say what you like about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos."
I can't believe there are still people like this around. Yeah, a satanic cult that promotes pedophilia, child sodomy, and genital mutilation is the "cure" to society's problems.
Religion and feminism are the number #1 and #2 problems in society. Eliminate them, and you eliminate most of society's ills.
I've never had to deal with feminism or be in the midst of it, but from what I've read & seen in videos, it's basically a socially conditioned preset bias against men. Feminism causes irrational behaviour, lack of clarity, anger, rage, & self entitlement.
Who else shows these characteristics besides feminists?? Children & People under the influence of a drug.
Children behave this way because from the time they're born we are their servants, so they naturally expect us to slave for them out of unconditional love. From the time was say, No!' or have to dicipline them, the tables get turned so we tend to see some of the above mentioned behaviour; irrational behaviour, lack of clarity, anger, rage, & self entitlement. People under the influence of a drug display similar behaviour sometimes as well. I have no idea what their fight is all about because compared to most woment in some parts of africa & the arab world they have it real nice. I blame your governments they are the parents/creators. I also have a thoery that the major food supplies are contminated thus causing sporadic irrational behaviour. Look at ingredient labels, loaded with chemicals. If you can't recognise an ingredient, most likely your body won't be able to either.
It's like they're creating problems when their isn't any.
- It's easy to give, when you know what it's like to have nothing. -
- Develop a backbone, not a wishbone. -
God's already dead, remember? Religion used to keep women in line.
Besides, there's no way to eliminate religion. It's psychologically impossible. No such thing as a true atheist.
Which religion are you referring to Clowny? It is not wise to group all belief systems together under the word religion.
I don't know where you are from but when the United States was at it's strongest point, God was at the center of everything. The Bible was taught in the school system, pornography was unheard of and the family structure was made up of a husband and wife. If children got out of line, they would be physically disciplined. Even our dollar had real value and was backed by the GOLD standard.
Homosexuality, abortion, porn and fornication are now encouraged by TPTB . Feminism was also created to destroy the family structure.
Christianity and our Constitution are now under attack.
Men chase, women choose
As long as you have gold in your hand, you will ALWAYS have bread on your table.
Feminism is essentially a power grab by elite men. One of many. It is the idea that elite men own all females in a society. One of the problems with a technologically advanced society is that it creates a surplus of resources more or less automatically, and this surplus can be used by the elite to promote forms of dysfunctionality that benefit themselves at the expense of everyone else. Feminism is tremendously inefficient and would cause most societies to collapse immediately, but in Western society the surplus of resources can be used to prop it up. Probably most of the resources of Western society go into dealing with the damaging consequences of feminism.
I would certainly assert that the root cause is money.
Women love money. As women have more money they become more independent. This independence means they know they 'need' other people and God less. This makes them meaner and less religious.
(This is true for men too, except that men love money less. Their attraction to a woman rises when she's poorer because he can provide for her. The woman's attraction to a man rises when he's richer because he can provide for her. The modern society has women far richer than they used to be and throws everything out of kilter).
Religion is not the cause of feminism in my view. It's a symptom of the cause: too much money. Women who are religious in the West still divorce a lot and still have a lot in common with other Western women so being religious doesn't save them but it's a good and necessary start.
Religion is not the major cause I feel because if a woman goes to Church regularly in the West, it doesn't fix her. Lack of money (with not a miriad of easy ways of getting it) would fix women up. From that cause would come a religious outlook. In the West, if a woman has no money it means nothing - because she always has many ways of obtaining hand-outs from others and the government.
There are poor matriarchal tribes. I would consider them to be feminist.
I said that the only cure is a sound moral religion. Modern Christianity is an unsound immoral religion. Religion is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for morality. Never in history has a society been moral without a strong religion.
Following the Old Testament, not evil modern culture
I agree that modern Christianity is unsound. Many passages are irrelevant (Chosen people), circumcision (unethical and a crime against men), and others are twisted to justify peoples' oppression (they will receive rewards in heaven, as if their life on Earth doesn't matter), and to justify paying taxes (which doesn't go to supporting anything except corruption and immorality). Also, many so called Christians support homosexuality, feminism, harlotry, and believe that they can act immoral and go to heaven when they die. Those actions prove they are not true believers.
I believe that the world needs a new and sound religion. One that is free from corruption, not willing to give ground to reformists, and one that is uninfluenced by Zionists. It would be easy to see that Zionists may also control the Vatican and most of the larger Protestant Churches. Why does the Vatican never speak out against the lack of adherence to morals or challenge the oppression of Christians? Surely they have the authority, influence, and renown to make a significant impact? Yet they do nothing to openly challenge and confront the ZOGs of the Anglosphere and Western Europe? A sizable number of Protestant Churches allow openly homosexual clergy, some allow same-sex marriages, and all the large Protestant Churches do less than the Vatican when it comes to challenging or confronting the ZOGs. They too have the authority, influence, and renown to motivate their believers and try to begin a counter-culture movement. The only Churches that still have the ability and the will to influence their people and society are the Orthodox Churches of Eastern Europe. Similarly, the women are more moral, resist feminism, and the people resist homosexuality.
In the past Christians followed their morals and they became powerful. Any great and powerful civilization needed religion to give their people unity, morals, and tradition. People inherently need to believe in theism or acknowledge there is a creator. Many of the traditional Atheistic religions do not worship any deity but they also do not deny the existence of one or attack theists.
Western Atheism is more of an anti-moral, anti-tradition, pro-feminist, pro-homosexuality, and ultra-progressive movement which lists it's main cause as anti-religion. Statistically, most Western Women who are Western Atheists are more slutty, more manly, smoke, binge drink, and are man-haters. Western Atheists are likely to be feminists, homosexuals, liberals, pro-abortion, and have many tattoos (or unattractive piercings like gauges in their ears).
Many people identify as Christian but have no morals. Identifying as a certain religion, not adhering to its morals, and not having any morals whatsoever has the only interpretation that the person is non-religious masquerading as religious to feel better about themselves as if it was a great big country club where they can go a few times a year for special occasions, receive forgiveness for their immorality (sins), and maybe have a wedding in a Church. They might believe in God so they decide to still identify with their religion of birth out of habit.
Another factor is the Vatican and Protestant Churches might also rely on the donations for survival so they may not want to risk angering and isolating their "wealthier" parishioners in the Western World so they would allow themselves to hollow out their tenants or refuse to reprimand followers.
A strong and sound religion is necessary for morality, but it is not enough unless people adhere to the tenants and follow it's morals.
12 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], MSNbot Media and 9 guests