MartinLutherKing.org - Legit or Racist Attack?

[Winston]

MLK was just another disinfo agent, just like Alex Jones, just like David Icke, just like any big leader that the Illuminati allows to get big.

Remember, minor celebrities like Tila Tequila, and other very minor people, get KILLED for speaking out against the Illuminati.

The proof that Alex Jones is an agent is the fact that he is still alive.

William Cooper was one of the first to start speaking out against the Illuminati. HE was killed in 2001, and he said "Alex Jones is an agent to try to create a civil war".

Why would the govt want a civil war or unrest? Cause it gives them an excuse to create a full scale police state and martial law.

Anonymous is also another very obvious CIA disinfo campaign.

So anyone who is a threat to the establishment who is killed is legit, and anyone still alive is a disinfo shill? Excuse me, but did you forget that MLK was assassinated? So by your definition, he should be legit right?

William Cooper had a small following and was no threat. Why would they take him out? And why would a police officer shoot him in cold blood unless Cooper tried to shoot at him first? That incident was odd, but it's not obvious if he was taken out or not.

I don't understand the MLK hate site though. Just because he has dirt in his past doesn't mean his whole movement and legacy should be discredited or that his holiday should be repealed.

What the mainstream media don't want you to know is that a civil court already ruled that MLK was killed by a government conspiracy and exonerated James Earl Ray. This should be big news, but the mainstream media ignored it, because it would produce public outrage that a conspiracy killed their hero and was covered up.

http://www.actofstate.org/

Great documentary on the assassination of MLK and why he was a threat to the establishment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-PZQAf0bszo

Conspiracy theory documentary on who killed MLK:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmoPSUTazvQ

[BlackGuyFromEngland]

Just now, I was looking on Wikipedia for some information on the "Stormfront" because I have seen it mentioned a few times on this forum. As I read the Wikipedia article, it mentioned a site called Martinlutherking.org. I went to this site, and I read half of one of the articles. I asked myself, "Is this a white racist attempt to discredit Dr. King, or is this legitimate?" Well, here is the site in question:

http://martinlutherking.org/

The site looks cheap and rushed and the fact it's hosted by stormfront which tells you everything.

I'm surprised the domain name was not taken. I'm sure the family of MLK will shut down the site pretty quickly.

On the point of MLK having sex with three women before he got shot? It's not the thing a married man should be doing but JFK was banging more women than a porn star but no-one ever brings that up and on the larger point. It's the dirty little secret of the white supremacist movement in America : Klan leaders with black girlfriends. A neo-Nazi caught with a black transvestite. A macho skinhead arrested while soliciting sex from Latino men. National Socialists affiliated with Satanists who promote sexual ceremonies involving children.

And the arrest of Kevin Alfred Strom, a key "intellectual" of the radical right, for possession of child pornography.

Just days after the Jan. 4 arrest of the leader of the neo-Nazi National Vanguard group, news emerged that two weeks earlier another prominent National Vanguard member had been arrested for another sexual crime. Police in Brookline, Mass., jailed Matthew Downing, a 25-year-old activist and organizer with the Boston unit of the organization, on a felony charge of statutory rape.

Officials say that an acquaintance of Downing's, 17-year-old Jeremy Perea, got two teenage girls to come to Downing's Brookline home six days before Christmas. Once they were there, Perea allegedly told them he would not drive them home unless one had intercourse with Downing. They refused, but one of them, a 14-year-old, agreed to perform oral sex on the Aryan activist.

Remember that Eugene Terrablanche ? The white supremacist in South Africa. The guy used was a child molestor of black boys.

http://www.queerty.com/was-south-africa ... s-20100412

Or how about Klan boss Gordon Creal Young, 40, and charged him with seven criminal counts for allegedly forcing an underage girl to perform oral sex on him on two occasions in late October 2006. Young, who was then still the imperial wizard of the World Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, also allegedly told the girl on another day that Klan members always strip females who want to join in order to search their bodies for imperfections. The girl later told a pastor that Young then touched her inappropriately.

I could go on.

[C.J.]

Thank god I don't rely on all of you guys for factual information, I'd be a rat in a maze.

MLK was a worthless dog, and anyone with a brain should know better.

The difference between JFK and him was like night and day. JFK was just a highly valuable shill(he had more restraint than MLK at least), while MLK was a slave, leading and taking advantage of slaves. Who are STILL slaves btw. Makes you think (or not, I know westerners cry when they have to think).

The biggest difference was what'd happen if both were still alive today and allowed to do what they wanted. JFK would've actually changed the world for the better by crusading against the Fed and revealing their innermost secrets, which was why he was actually assassinated and processed(his body is missing some parts...). MLK was not. There's a big difference between high and low-profile killings.

Did you know that Gandhi and MLK are very similar? Not because of their respective movements, but the way they talk and how there's so much energy being used to cover up their true natures that'd turn the world upside down!

Just imagine if people knew who these guys REALLY were, that their true nature was the opposite of what was perceived to be...

[Winston]

Just now, I was looking on Wikipedia for some information on the "Stormfront" because I have seen it mentioned a few times on this forum. As I read the Wikipedia article, it mentioned a site called Martinlutherking.org. I went to this site, and I read half of one of the articles. I asked myself, "Is this a white racist attempt to discredit Dr. King, or is this legitimate?" Well, here is the site in question:

http://martinlutherking.org/

The site looks cheap and rushed and the fact it's hosted by stormfront which tells you everything.

I'm surprised the domain name was not taken. I'm sure the family of MLK will shut down the site pretty quickly.

Yes that's true. Technically, according to ICANN law, which governs domain names, that domain name is illegal. You cannot use a person's full name by itself in a domain name if you are not that person. To do so constitutes impersonation and defamation. For example, you can't have a domain name like BritneySpears.com if you are not Britney Spears, but you can have one like BritneySpearsFanClub.com if you want, because the latter makes it obvious that you are not that person. This is ICANN official law.

But you don't have to be the King family to report this. Anyone can report this to ICANN or the domain registrar that owns it. Just google the domain name to find out which company owns it. Then you can report it to them or to ICANN.

MLK was a worthless dog, and anyone with a brain should know better.

The difference between JFK and him was like night and day. JFK was just a highly valuable shill(he had more restraint than MLK at least), while MLK was a slave, leading and taking advantage of slaves. Who are STILL slaves btw. Makes you think (or not, I know westerners cry when they have to think).

Excuse me. You are making pure ad hominem attacks against MLK without any valid reasons or arguments. You haven't presented anything that makes him out to be a bad person, or renders his movement and campaign to be not what it claimed to be. Even if MLK did bad things, that doesn't change what he stood for or his accomplishments in human rights.

For example, as a result of the Rosa Parks fiasco which went public, MLK used that to get laws passed to end segregation in the US, and repeal the Jim Crow laws. That was a real documented accomplishment by Dr. King that got real results in a positive direction. So even if he cheated on his wife, that doesn't change that. I don't understand why some of you think that a man is considered discredited just because he wasn't a saint. No one is a saint. Who is? So why hold someone up to such a standard just to discredit him?

[C.J.]

Unfortunately Winston, you and most westerners don't understand his actions and what the implications of those actions were.

He HELPED create incredible social change. However, it was not change for the better. At best, he threw American blacks into the fire. What blacks in the west celebrate as his legacy of freedom, is actually slavery under the federal reserve and a lack of racial identity and pride.

What does a "free" black man in america know about his people, their heritage, their strength, their freedom? Nothing. Because he's either dead, a bum, a criminal or a wageslave. He is just a pawn.

[Moretorque]

Somebody told me the real reason or main reason MLK was killed was he was rallying against the Vietnam war and so was JFK and that was just another nail in his coffin ? I agree about JFK, somewhere down the line he had his own ideas and they didn't fit in with the ruling elites.