Happier Abroad Forum Community

Feel free to project anything you want

This is interesting, I think that alone, Mel and I look like Gamma(+) individuals, ppl with rich inner worlds but otherworldly speaking, look like academicians or just successful white collar professionals.

When we're together, however, because then society sees us as a cohesive unit, we get immediately pushed into the alpha(+) world, since in America, it's expected that attractive ppl have a relationship, and then, there's a lot of envy and jealously, because we're free and happy with some resources to boot. The other alphabet soup couples feel less successful and then, there's that sort of competition thing which takes hold.

.

Ghost wrote:Entertaining. Who originally came up with this chart?

Only in America (The West)...It's a needlessly fleshed out chart of comparisons, though it is entertaining. I guess we know now why MGTOWs call themselves that...calling them Gamma Positives just didn't have the same ring to it.

FBI profiling has become rather popular in western culture these days

Thus, this is in line with that line of taxonomy. So Gamma(+)s are clearly the way to go. I'd say that the only true Alpha(+)s are ppl like Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, who're so rich, that they kowtow to no one. Realize, if Beta(+)s act like Alpha(+)s, more likely than not, they'll be fired in time, as they threaten their chain of command. The Gamma(+), however, has enough going on in life, to avoid upsetting the apple cart and are able to have successful careers, because they steer clear of traps and such. One example of this was a Beta(+), who took on an executive VP job, thinking that it was his ticket to the big show but was denied proper resources, by his higher ups. Well, his section was later laid off. It was a trap, using his ambition against him.

Ghost wrote:Entertaining. Who originally came up with this chart?

Only in America (The West)...It's a needlessly fleshed out chart of comparisons, though it is entertaining. I guess we know now why MGTOWs call themselves that...calling them Gamma Positives just didn't have the same ring to it.

From what you guys know about me, how would you classify me LOL?

.

Bao3niang wrote:From what you guys know about me, how would you classify me LOL?

Obviously I'm an Alpha +

I would say you're a D+ from your silly posts

.

Ghost wrote:

Bao3niang wrote:From what you guys know about me, how would you classify me LOL?

The answer is that it doesn't matter. Don't constrain yourself with labels. Though labels can be useful, this kind of thing is often born from the insecurities Western societies implant into mens' minds. Use such definitions if you find it useful, but don't be a slave to it. Not saying you would, just a word of advice.

This one is an Omega -

.

Ghost wrote:

Paloaltoguy wrote:

Ghost wrote:

Bao3niang wrote:From what you guys know about me, how would you classify me LOL?

The answer is that it doesn't matter. Don't constrain yourself with labels. Though labels can be useful, this kind of thing is often born from the insecurities Western societies implant into mens' minds. Use such definitions if you find it useful, but don't be a slave to it. Not saying you would, just a word of advice.

This one is an Omega -

That's the cleverest retort you could form? That's feeble even for you. In that case, you don't rate.

Just ask yourself Ghost, did your message deserve a better reply? All it was was a thoughtless projection. I guess that's the best a omega can
do

.

MarcosZeitola wrote:

Ghost wrote:Entertaining. Who originally came up with this chart?

Only in America (The West)...It's a needlessly fleshed out chart of comparisons, though it is entertaining. I guess we know now why MGTOWs call themselves that...calling them Gamma Positives just didn't have the same ring to it.

I disagree. I think a lot of MGTOWs are Delta's and some as low as Omega's, both the positive and the negative kind. The positive delta fits MGTOW the best because they care about collecting items, possessions and freedom as stated by the picture. They are less interests in other aspects of human life, such as dating, sex, family, but may dote on a car collection or guns, or take great pride in their house and various hobbies.

1+

Lol

MarcosZeitola wrote:

Paloaltoguy wrote:

MarcosZeitola wrote:

Ghost wrote:Entertaining. Who originally came up with this chart?

Only in America (The West)...It's a needlessly fleshed out chart of comparisons, though it is entertaining. I guess we know now why MGTOWs call themselves that...calling them Gamma Positives just didn't have the same ring to it.

I disagree. I think a lot of MGTOWs are Delta's and some as low as Omega's, both the positive and the negative kind. The positive delta fits MGTOW the best because they care about collecting items, possessions and freedom as stated by the picture. They are less interests in other aspects of human life, such as dating, sex, family, but may dote on a car collection or guns, or take great pride in their house and various hobbies.

1+

Lol

Now let's get back on topic and not attack each other as much as before, shall we? It's kind of getting old. We're men, not school girls. Let's classify some people on these boards. I think those who go abroad successfully are Beta+ or Alpha+, those who score anywhere Alpha- or Alpha+, and those who stay at home moping tend to belong in the lower regions of the ranking. MGTOW are the lowest of the low... Men Growin' Their Own Weed, and high on fairy tales.

Absolutely. That's precisely why I won't allow myself to become burdened by the ignorance which binds the hands (as well as the mind) of omega posters like Ghost. Rather than lazily allowing myself to rest on my laurels, and bring nothing to the table of humanity, I instead choose to be a pioneer in the field of knowledge and discovery.

Now on to the topic at hand, I believe the founder of this website is Beta- or I suppose some people just get kicks out of watching themselves fail.