Happier Abroad Forum Community

BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories".

MarcosZeitola wrote:

BlackKnight wrote:I think most males who have a hard time with women are just ugly or retarded. But it's funny to sit back and admire the psychological gymnastics going on with all their "theories".

While you are clearly oversimplifying things with this statement, it is true that many men who do bad with women are not anywhere near as good looking, intelligent and desirable as they think they are. There are armies of men who look average or below average, have lousy social skills and are very shy and reserved, but nevertheless expect women to throw themselves at them and are shocked to find this is not the case.

Similarly, you have a lot of men who have been brainwashed by today's "Women can do everything men can do" bullshit, and now believe women could (and should!) be the ones making the first move. This does not happen because, once again, they aren't as appealing as they think they are. These men come up with a million of theories on how society is corrupt and women are evil, conveniently ignoring their own part in their misfortune: their own inactivity, and unwillingness to change.

Successful men need not bother themselves with complicated theories on the state of womanhood, they don't need lifestyle gurus or dating coaches. They're just going through the motions, and allowing nature to take it's course. And sometimes, when nature takes it's course, certain men find themselves left out. Men who are too lazy, or too prideful, to look at alternatives.

For these fools, no mercy.

Yohan wrote:RooshV is the typical PUA.

Switching over like an actor when facing stupid women, showing up with a different personality than he is in real life and tries to convince them to find him 'interesting'. Not my life-style.

While I do not like him at all, at least he is disturbing feminists a lot. That's nice...

The men reading Roosh’s books are more likely to be lonely, desperate, web-based singletons. These men pose no threat to women. At worst, they might repulse them when they deploy Roosh’s creepy tactics.

Ghost wrote:You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.

Ghost wrote:

MarcosZeitola wrote: My 'superior genes' are doing alright; a woman I knew wanted to become a mother, sans husband or relationship. She seemed a bit damaged, probably asexual. She asked me to be the biological father of her children, and I fathered two sons by her through insemination. Therefore my genes live on in my country of birth as well as in my chosen country of residence where I have a wife and daughter.

I'm sorry to hear that.

And, for the record, I don't recall claiming my genes as superior in any of my posts. I do believe, from what I've been told, that I am fairly attractive physically. And I won't deny it helps. But to dismiss all of my observations and opinions just because of my perceived "pretty boy" status, is a bit of a low blow. I am not making any assumptions on your looks either, Ghost, and using them to invalidate your opinion. This is the sort of behavior I would expect from a jealous high school girl hating on her prettier and more popular friend, not from a grown a** redpiller in his twenties.

You don't need to make any assumptions about my looks. I've stated many times in the forum that I am not attractive. You are so quick to dismiss unattractive men because of their looks, as if that should have anything to do with whether or not they get a mate. It shouldn't, which is my point. Women are the ones offering youth and fertility; indeed this is the crux of what they have to offer, whereas that is not nearly as crucial for a man - and he has many other things to offer as well. If we lived in a sane world, every man would be allowed a mate (assuming he is not some thug.) The very fact that women are allowed to choose mates based on looks (such as in the U.S. where looks supersede everything else) shows how sick society is. It means most men get left out and destroyed, and violence becomes inevitable as society implodes.

You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.

gnosis wrote:

Ghost wrote:You're blind to your advantage. I don't think you're despicable for having the advantage, but for dissing those who don't get to have it as well. Can't control having an ugly face or being genetically programmed to lose your hair, nor can freak accidents be controlled. Just like virtually all prettyboys, you don't realize that the reason you have had it so easy is just because of your looks. Without that you would've actually had to work at it. But it all falls effortlessly into your lap, costing you no extra effort, and then you smugly sit back and gloat on it.

You're as shallow as a puddle.

That's a bit harsh. Obviously, even if you're a man, having a pretty face helps, but the main thing is money. If you are a rich man, it doesn't really matter what you look like. (Of course, it's almost impossible to become a rich man.)

Ghost wrote:

Outright ugly people are rare and HAVE to fight to stay alive. It's been like that since the beginning. If a woman mates with an ugly guy her kids will likely be undesirable. So an ugly guy has to compensate. So get off your a** and get with it!

It is only such a big issue in decadent societies that are declining. Such societies deserve to perish for their vapidity. Outside of the feminist West I do just fine and get treated like a human being. Many girls tell me I am handsome. Being chubby or fat is more often seen as cute. Things like thinning hair are probably neutral at best, though I try to conceal that a bit. And then my positive attributes here become very positive, such as height, white skin, and blue eyes. Making good money compared to the locals and having had some adventures I can talk about helps too.

At least abroad you get to weigh your positives against your negatives. In the West, you either are 'perfect' in every regard or you get rejected outright.