Are women happier than men? Yes and no, key differences
Posted: May 6th, 2025, 12:16 am
Do you think women are happier than men? They do seem happier than men do and don't get as depressed as men do. However I think the answer is both yes and no. Here's why.
Women do enjoy superficial pleasures and happiness more. They love comfort and luxury and modern conveniences. They get more free gifts and attention and admiration and adoration than men. That's why they get a lot more likes than men do on Facebook. They get free things like gifts and help/assistance and free admiration from people and strangers just for being women. So they are happier in a superficial and shallow sense.
However the big drawback in being a woman is that they lack inner strength or depth in their soul and cannot harness creativity the way a soulful man can. Hence they are in a sense half a man and not complete. They cannot go out and slay dragons or conquer lands or explore new territories the way men can. They cannot compose masterpieces like Mozart and Beethoven did. They cannot invent new technologies like Thomas Edison and Steve Jobs and other male inventors did. That's why there has never been any female equivalents of Mozart or Beethoven or Da Vinci or Tesla, etc.
In short, nature created women to be nurturers and wives, not conquerors or innovators or leaders or explorers. That's the key difference between women and men.
Hence women have incomplete souls and always feel vulnerable like they need protection and cannot be brave or courageous the way men can at their best. So in that sense they can't be truly happy or complete the way men imagine happiness to be like.
They also cannot experience emotions deeply the way a man can. Because their soul lack depth and are more geared toward superficiality and shallowness and surface level emotions. They can't be as depressed or be into deep depressive realism like Dostoyevsky or Nietzsche or Schopenhauer could. Because their souls lack depth. Hence they don't suffer internally or existentially the way men can. They also cannot see great beauty and glory the way men can either. They aren't good at seeing the bigger picture or deeper issues.
Hence women cannot be true philosophers. At best they only understand things like human rights and ecology and earth imbalance and saving the environment. That's as deep as they can get. Lol
However, women are good at having intuition about people and little things. Their sixth sense is probably more attuned and honed than men are. So they are more sensitive to occult and witchcraft, because it helps level the playing field and makes up for their lack of power and strength. But women don't have the inner and outer strength that men can have, when men are at their best that is and not crushed down.
So basically women may have political power, especially in America. But they don't have inner strength and depth in their soul and personality. Nor outer strength which is why men and women can't compete in sports against each other. That's why when women try to act strong it doesn't look natural or feminine, but makes them look like butch lesbians and unlikable. Because it's not their nature to act strong the way a man is.
Now, a woman can be strong and feminine though -- which you can see in the movies of the 50s, 60s, and 70s -- if they keep their femininity and don't lose it. However the feminism in America from the 1990s onward tells women to lose their femininity and view it as oppressive. Hence the modern strong woman in America seems like a monster and is very unfeminine and unlikable and unnatural. It's very sad and scary.
Deep down American women and feminists must know that their power is a temporary facade only, not real or genuine or natural. Hence that makes them feel insecure deep down I would think. That's why confident American women never look truly confident. They look like they are trying to be something they are not, which is inauthentic.
Anyway that's my take on this question. What do you think?
Isn't all the above so true but taboo to talk about? Probably in China and Russia it would be more acceptable to say the above than in America. Hence there is some free speech in China and Russia that America doesn't have, which US media will never tell you of course.
Women do enjoy superficial pleasures and happiness more. They love comfort and luxury and modern conveniences. They get more free gifts and attention and admiration and adoration than men. That's why they get a lot more likes than men do on Facebook. They get free things like gifts and help/assistance and free admiration from people and strangers just for being women. So they are happier in a superficial and shallow sense.
However the big drawback in being a woman is that they lack inner strength or depth in their soul and cannot harness creativity the way a soulful man can. Hence they are in a sense half a man and not complete. They cannot go out and slay dragons or conquer lands or explore new territories the way men can. They cannot compose masterpieces like Mozart and Beethoven did. They cannot invent new technologies like Thomas Edison and Steve Jobs and other male inventors did. That's why there has never been any female equivalents of Mozart or Beethoven or Da Vinci or Tesla, etc.
In short, nature created women to be nurturers and wives, not conquerors or innovators or leaders or explorers. That's the key difference between women and men.
Hence women have incomplete souls and always feel vulnerable like they need protection and cannot be brave or courageous the way men can at their best. So in that sense they can't be truly happy or complete the way men imagine happiness to be like.
They also cannot experience emotions deeply the way a man can. Because their soul lack depth and are more geared toward superficiality and shallowness and surface level emotions. They can't be as depressed or be into deep depressive realism like Dostoyevsky or Nietzsche or Schopenhauer could. Because their souls lack depth. Hence they don't suffer internally or existentially the way men can. They also cannot see great beauty and glory the way men can either. They aren't good at seeing the bigger picture or deeper issues.
Hence women cannot be true philosophers. At best they only understand things like human rights and ecology and earth imbalance and saving the environment. That's as deep as they can get. Lol
However, women are good at having intuition about people and little things. Their sixth sense is probably more attuned and honed than men are. So they are more sensitive to occult and witchcraft, because it helps level the playing field and makes up for their lack of power and strength. But women don't have the inner and outer strength that men can have, when men are at their best that is and not crushed down.
So basically women may have political power, especially in America. But they don't have inner strength and depth in their soul and personality. Nor outer strength which is why men and women can't compete in sports against each other. That's why when women try to act strong it doesn't look natural or feminine, but makes them look like butch lesbians and unlikable. Because it's not their nature to act strong the way a man is.
Now, a woman can be strong and feminine though -- which you can see in the movies of the 50s, 60s, and 70s -- if they keep their femininity and don't lose it. However the feminism in America from the 1990s onward tells women to lose their femininity and view it as oppressive. Hence the modern strong woman in America seems like a monster and is very unfeminine and unlikable and unnatural. It's very sad and scary.
Deep down American women and feminists must know that their power is a temporary facade only, not real or genuine or natural. Hence that makes them feel insecure deep down I would think. That's why confident American women never look truly confident. They look like they are trying to be something they are not, which is inauthentic.
Anyway that's my take on this question. What do you think?
Isn't all the above so true but taboo to talk about? Probably in China and Russia it would be more acceptable to say the above than in America. Hence there is some free speech in China and Russia that America doesn't have, which US media will never tell you of course.
