Page 12 of 13

Re: And then....

Posted: February 26th, 2011, 3:49 pm
by Woman'sview
the_hero_of_time wrote:
S_Parc wrote:
the_hero_of_time wrote:Hey, Mr. Squirrel asked you a question (or several questions, to be technical). Why can't you just give him a straight answer instead of parroting your feminist-not-all-Werstern/American-women-are-like-that propaganda and dancing around his question/questions (did you know that even though parrots repeat what they hear, they actually do not know what they are saying)? Is it because, deep down, you know that you do not have a straight/legitimate answer to his questions? Or maybe, it's because you know his questions to be true...
Hero_of_time, WV is attempting a type of non-Hakeem Dream Shake where she posts up, slightly reverses direction, & then hits re-play. Unlike the NBA Hall of Famer, however, she ain't scoring around here so she goes into a 'turfing mode where she tries to insinuate that someone says the wrong thing or is going abroad and doing "dishonorable" things. Realize, I'd shredded every maneuver of hers so she resorts to a move which psychologically challenged persons like my sister used to do all the time, whenever a guy (esp my father in this case) didn't agree with her ...
WomansView wrote:S_Parc, do you guys here hate all American women?
And that's it ... Slam Dunk! She's lost the battle but thought that it was a clever knife being thrown back at me, and hence, no snatching victory in a time of defeat like in the movies.

Here's an idea... let's all stop reposting the same diatribes to her and perhaps she'll find a new forum to hang out in. She's rather transparent now.
You're right about that one. However, I am still kinda green to this whole movement... Anyway, I bet no one can identify where I got my screen name from :)
the_hero_of_time, where did you get your screen name from?

Posted: February 26th, 2011, 7:50 pm
by swincor
Wu ought to just ban the irrational c*unt. It is just that even bad traffic is still counted.

Anyhow, this is how insulted her ego is. She must keep coming back to try to dissuade us. As if the power of e-vagina is that powerful to those of us who have been outside the Matrix. If we were all manginas, then there would have been multiple Cap'n Sav-a-whore moments.

Winston is Cap'n Save-a-Ho himself, and demonstrated that in an earlier thread where I confronted Woman's View (formerly ahardy).

After I dressed her down in a very rough, uncouth manner (which for a time did shut her up, and led her to re-register under her new, current username), Winston immediately rushed to her defense, and threatened to ban me, which of course elicited a very public "thank you" from WV.

You guys here trying to score debate points with WV is very much like an adult engaging in debate with a child. You know you won't get her (or other women) to shut up or see the light by employing reason and logic. Yet, you behave as though you don't know this, when in fact you do know. Very strange and mystifying.

You will not win any debate with her or other like-minded woman. The solution to her goading, useless, and annoying posts is of course to ban her.

Posted: February 26th, 2011, 8:12 pm
by S_Parc
swincor__ wrote:Winston is Cap'n Save-a-Ho himself, and demonstrated that in an earlier thread where I confronted Woman's View (formerly ahardy).

After I dressed her down in a very rough, uncouth manner (which for a time did shut her up, and led her to re-register under her new, current username), Winston immediately rushed to her defense, and threatened to ban me, which of course elicited a very public "thank you" from WV.

You guys here trying to score debate points with WV is very much like an adult engaging in debate with a child. You know you won't get her (or other women) to shut up or see the light by employing reason and logic. Yet, you behave as though you don't know this, when in fact you do know. Very strange and mystifying.

You will not win any debate with her or other like-minded woman. The solution to her goading, useless, and annoying posts is of course to ban her.
I'm hoping for diplomatic isolation, a type of forum wide embargo where everyone responds with "stated earlier by S_Parc, TruthVille, etc" and then, not bother with these lengthy circular responses which are now becoming very predictable. This minimizes dialogues and presents a united anti-trolling thesis.

Posted: February 26th, 2011, 11:55 pm
by swincor
S_Parc wrote:
swincor__ wrote:Winston is Cap'n Save-a-Ho himself, and demonstrated that in an earlier thread where I confronted Woman's View (formerly ahardy).

After I dressed her down in a very rough, uncouth manner (which for a time did shut her up, and led her to re-register under her new, current username), Winston immediately rushed to her defense, and threatened to ban me, which of course elicited a very public "thank you" from WV.

You guys here trying to score debate points with WV is very much like an adult engaging in debate with a child. You know you won't get her (or other women) to shut up or see the light by employing reason and logic. Yet, you behave as though you don't know this, when in fact you do know. Very strange and mystifying.

You will not win any debate with her or other like-minded woman. The solution to her goading, useless, and annoying posts is of course to ban her.
I'm hoping for diplomatic isolation, a type of forum wide embargo where everyone responds with "stated earlier by S_Parc, TruthVille, etc" and then, not bother with these lengthy circular responses which are now becoming very predictable. This minimizes dialogues and presents a united anti-trolling thesis.

To be honest, I see that as a reliance on wishful thinking. It won't stop her from posting, for one thing. And while some men may decide on an embargo-like action (I for one have never even participated in these threads involving WV), the fact is too many guys here indulge her and acknowledge her too readily. Why they do so is a good question. In any case, they will probably keep on doing so out of habit, especially if new members join.

She is not owed anything, certainly not the privilege of disturbing us with her unwanted presence. So there's really no reason to inhibit oneself from taking direct measures such as banning her, which I find would be far more effective than hoping that everyone not acknowledge her.

Posted: February 28th, 2011, 12:33 am
by Squirrel
Check your lenses. You just might need a more potent pair. As my questions seemed sarcastic they really were quite serious. I'll take this to mean you can't answer any of them. Which tells me you have no credibility whatsoever and no qualifiers to give good advice to any of these men. Unless you have insight on how you "whip the p***y" without getting arrested or paying out the nose with no appreciation gratitude or sex (in that order) Then I am afraid you have nothing of value to say. Your advice should be heeded just as much as a know nothing real estate agent buying property in the barrio of hell. LMAO And S_parc? Awesome remark about an entire female Marine Corps. Wonder how Iwo Jima would have played out? And hero_of_time? I'm pretty capable, but it is an awesome feeling indeed to see someone has your back. Too bad we are not in the same state, I buy people beers for that. :)

Posted: February 28th, 2011, 5:13 am
by The_Hero_of_Men
Squirrel wrote:Check your lenses. You just might need a more potent pair. As my questions seemed sarcastic they really were quite serious. I'll take this to mean you can't answer any of them. Which tells me you have no credibility whatsoever and no qualifiers to give good advice to any of these men. Unless you have insight on how you "whip the p***y" without getting arrested or paying out the nose with no appreciation gratitude or sex (in that order) Then I am afraid you have nothing of value to say. Your advice should be heeded just as much as a know nothing real estate agent buying property in the barrio of hell. LMAO And S_parc? Awesome remark about an entire female Marine Corps. Wonder how Iwo Jima would have played out? And hero_of_time? I'm pretty capable, but it is an awesome feeling indeed to see someone has your back. Too bad we are not in the same state, I buy people beers for that. :)

I don't drink alcohol, but thanks for the offer.

Posted: February 28th, 2011, 7:43 am
by Squirrel
Root beer! Yeah! I meant root beer!

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 8:25 am
by The_Hero_of_Men
Squirrel wrote:Root beer! Yeah! I meant root beer!
That would be awesome.. :) Anyway, I wonder where that Woman'sview has gone off to...

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 9:30 am
by Jackal
Woman'sview wrote:Are some men running from being responsible?
I will reply with another question: Are some women trying to have it both ways?

I would be very curious to know if Women's View has always been such a conservative, religious person. Was she at home washing her husband's shirts and praying when she was 22? Or was she out busily sucking all the bad boy cock she could get her hands on?

It seems to be a common pattern that American women will be as wild and slutty as they want when they are young, but then when they hit 35 or so and realize that they are no longer in such demand, they start to promote the conservative, religious outlook because it limits men's possibilities and gives women more emotional and economic stability.

The typical aging AW says, "Gee, I truly regret those thousands of times I've been pounded every which way by the cocks of psychotic bad boys. Now I've become religious and holy. Ta da!! Look, I'm great marriage material. I've changed--I swear! Nice guys, check me out!"

They are trying to have it both ways.

They had their fun. Now we can have ours. So they should shut the f**k up.

Most AW's statements about "holiness" are pure hypocrisy which are at least as self-serving as a man's desire for a really good blowjob.
Woman'sview wrote: Will you give America a bad name, by constantly hanging around bars and nightclubs, approaching women for casual sex, and treating women like a plaything? Will you make women objects?
That's the wrong reason for going overseas.
It's also a good way to get an incurable venereal disease.
Perhaps, but let me tell you of another activity that gives women a high chance of getting vernereal diseases: having unprotected sex with hundreds of male partners in America!
Woman'sview wrote: Forgive American women her errors, and just live your life. Become a man. It's a worthy quest you'll probably have to devote your whole life to 7 days a week, 24 hrs a day, 365 days a year.
What you really mean is that American men should sacrifice their lives to American women. No, thanks. Too many American men have given everything they had mentally and physically to their American wives and families only to end up with nothing. The whole thing smacks of fascism, "Work for the glory of your nation-state, reap the fruits of your labor, reproduce to create more mindless workers for the state, and enjoy your recreational time by doing one of several state-approved activities."

And who are you to judge who is a "real man"? For you it seems the term "real man" equals "slave." And that's really the heart of the feminist agenda, no matter what guise it takes: turning men into slaves.

We the members of this forum refuse to be slaves. Find your slaves elsewhere.

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 9:57 am
by The_Hero_of_Men
@Jackal


No one wants a used Piece of chewing gum, especially one that has been chewed up and spit out. AWs are like chewing gum.

Let me break down what I mean: AWs are like chewing gum. They get chewed up (i.e. Sucking ridiculously high numbers of bad boy cock, screwing the football team and their friends, etc.) when they're fresh (from their early teens to mid-to-late 20s), then get spit out due to their loss of flavor (the so-called bad boys screwing their best friend and then dumping them, then these females developing an undesirable reputation for sleeping with any and everybody, to the point where even the most desperate of guys would want nothing to do with her, when she is in her 30s and past her 30s). Like I said earlier, who in their right mind would want a piece of chewing gum that has already been chewed up and spit out??

Posted: March 4th, 2011, 1:02 pm
by jamesbond
Jackal wrote:
"It seems to be a common pattern that American women will be as wild and slutty as they want when they are young, but then when they hit 35 or so and realize that they are no longer in such demand, they start to promote the conservative, religious outlook because it limits men's possibilities and gives women more emotional and economic stability.

The typical aging AW says, "Gee, I truly regret those thousands of times I've been pounded every which way by the cocks of psychotic bad boys. Now I've become religious and holy. Ta da!! Look, I'm great marriage material. I've changed--I swear! Nice guys, check me out!"
They are trying to have it both ways.

They had their fun. Now we can have ours. So they should shut the f**k up.

Who is a "real man"? For you it seems the term "real man" equals "slave." And that's really the heart of the feminist agenda, no matter what guise it takes: turning men into slaves.

We the members of this forum refuse to be slaves. Find your slaves elsewhere."

Very well put Jackal! American women love to sleep around with "bad boys" when they are young, then when they hit their 30's they suddenly find Jesus and want to get married! :lol:

Even some of the women you find in singles church groups were sluts in high school and college. I can't believe some of the horror stories I have heard from friends of mine who met some "nice girls" at church groups only to find out they were getting "more ass than a toilet seat" back in high school and college!

One of my friends told me a story where he met this "nice Christian girl" at a single church event and they started dating. She eventually told him she slept with "about 30 guys" before she "became a Christian." WTF? :shock: She even agreed to a gang bang back in college at a frat party where "about 7 guys" did her in one night! :shock:

Posted: March 14th, 2011, 5:56 pm
by The_Hero_of_Men
jamesbond wrote:Jackal wrote:
"It seems to be a common pattern that American women will be as wild and slutty as they want when they are young, but then when they hit 35 or so and realize that they are no longer in such demand, they start to promote the conservative, religious outlook because it limits men's possibilities and gives women more emotional and economic stability.

The typical aging AW says, "Gee, I truly regret those thousands of times I've been pounded every which way by the cocks of psychotic bad boys. Now I've become religious and holy. Ta da!! Look, I'm great marriage material. I've changed--I swear! Nice guys, check me out!"
They are trying to have it both ways.

They had their fun. Now we can have ours. So they should shut the f**k up.

Who is a "real man"? For you it seems the term "real man" equals "slave." And that's really the heart of the feminist agenda, no matter what guise it takes: turning men into slaves.

We the members of this forum refuse to be slaves. Find your slaves elsewhere."

Very well put Jackal! American women love to sleep around with "bad boys" when they are young, then when they hit their 30's they suddenly find Jesus and want to get married! :lol:

Even some of the women you find in singles church groups were sluts in high school and college. I can't believe some of the horror stories I have heard from friends of mine who met some "nice girls" at church groups only to find out they were getting "more ass than a toilet seat" back in high school and college!

One of my friends told me a story where he met this "nice Christian girl" at a single church event and they started dating. She eventually told him she slept with "about 30 guys" before she "became a Christian." WTF? :shock: She even agreed to a gang bang back in college at a frat party where "about 7 guys" did her in one night! :shock:



Amen, my brothers!!!!!!!!! Preach on!!!!!!!!!

Posted: March 14th, 2011, 7:21 pm
by ErikHeaven
To Womans View: I am a tall 6'1 lightskinned black male. I have been told by many ex girlfriends that i look good. Treating american women great gets you dumped and told that you are too "Nice". I am tired of this so i am dating my current filipina and life is wonderful for me. I am dating a woman that is 33 and a virgin. You cannot find american virgins here as they lose it around 10 now these days. American women in my opinion are 80% trash. I might be too generous!

Posted: April 17th, 2011, 7:59 pm
by The_Hero_of_Men
ErikHeaven wrote:To Womans View: I am a tall 6'1 lightskinned black male. I have been told by many ex girlfriends that i look good. Treating american women great gets you dumped and told that you are too "Nice". I am tired of this so i am dating my current filipina and life is wonderful for me. I am dating a woman that is 33 and a virgin. You cannot find american virgins here as they lose it around 10 now these days. American women in my opinion are 80% trash. I might be too generous!

Yeah yyou are being generous... try like 1000% of them :)

Posted: April 17th, 2011, 9:30 pm
by Adama
ErikHeaven wrote:To Womans View: I am a tall 6'1 lightskinned black male. I have been told by many ex girlfriends that i look good. Treating american women great gets you dumped and told that you are too "Nice". I am tired of this so i am dating my current filipina and life is wonderful for me. I am dating a woman that is 33 and a virgin. You cannot find american virgins here as they lose it around 10 now these days. American women in my opinion are 80% trash. I might be too generous!
Closer to 99.999%.