Ghost wrote:Moretorque wrote:Just watch the Apollo 11 press conference, it says it all. They never went!
It would be easy for them to send Droid however, you don't have to worry about shit, shave or shower and that's just the short list.
I'm watching it now. I only just started watching it, so maybe there's an admission in there where they state they never went...
but so far all I'm seeing is people in the comments saying, "look at their faces and listen to their voices! They are obviously lying!"
That's the evidence that Apollo 11 was a hoax?! That's laughable...at best.
Edit: Now I'm about 25 minutes into it. Overall, it just sounds like a normal, boring press conference. The astronauts look bored, but there is also plenty of joking and laughter during the conference. So far, no admission that it was a hoax...
You're shitting us right? Are you on crack or weed? You mean you can't tell the difference between a bored face and a guilty/reluctant/sad one? Even dogs and children can see the difference. Why can't you?! WTF?!
They do not look bored. They look disturbed and bothered by guilt, because they were forced into going along with the moon hoax. If you really went to the moon and were the first one to do so, and you made it back and survived, would you look sad and guilty? No of course not. You'd look ecstatic and relieved, and be thanking the heavens that you made it back alive. Also, if you were in front of a news media and audience, you would try to look pleasant and friendly, not bored. Even if you were truly bored, you'd hide it in front of a press conference wouldn't you? Duh! This has been explained many times before.
Watch the press conference again. They do not look bored at all. They look guilty and reluctant that they are being forced to lie to the world that they went to the moon. That's not what a bored face looks like. Everyone knows this. Come on.
Here are images of their sad, guilty, reluctant faces below:
Now do those look like bored faces to you? These are mature adults, why would they look bored in an important press conference? Think about it! Think Think Think! Did you also know that 2+2=4? Or does that have to be pointed out too?
Here it is on video. Watch the faces closely. Quit your denial of the obvious. Notice how when Armstrong talks, he looks like he wants to cry. It's as if he's at a funeral or something.
Furthermore, did you know that after this press conference, Neil Armstrong went to his home in Ohio and rarely ever gave any interviews about it again for many years? He didn't want to talk about the moon missions for some reason. Why is that? Obviously because he doesn't like to lie.
In fact, one of his last interviews, Armstrong said that after the moon mission in 1969, he never thought about it again. Isn't that the oddest statement or what? He is cryptically telling you that it was a hoax. If you went to the moon and came back, would you never give it a second thought ever again?
Also, did you see that during the press conference, they were asked if they saw stars on the moon, and Michael Collins and Neil Armstrong looked at each other as if they didn't know what to say? That's highly suspicious.
Then when Armstrong says that, "We could not see any stars with the naked eye", Michael Collins turned to him and said, "I don't remember seeing any either." Yet Collins was in space inside the command module orbiting the moon at 4000 mph when Armstrong and Aldrin were on the moon's surface, allegedly. So why could he not see any stars out in space? Furthermore, in his autobiography called "Carrying the Fire", Michael Collins wrote that he could see lots of stars:
"My God, the stars are everywhere: above me on all sides, even below me somewhat, down there next to that obscure horizon. The stars are bright and they are steady. Of course I know that a star's twinkle is created by the atmosphere, and I have seen twinkle-less stars before in a planetarium, but this is different, this is no simulation, this is the best view of the universe that a human ever had." - Michael Collins, Carrying the Fire, pg. 221
So why did he contradict himself? How do you explain that?
Furthermore, any astronomer can tell you that on the moon's surface, you can see many stars vividly. So why did Armstrong say he couldn't? Did he f**k up the script?
Seriously Ghost, I like your posts, but you would make the absolute WORST DETECTIVE. You couldn't even solve the simplest case. And you'd make a horrible psychologist as well since you can't even read basic body language, which dogs and children can. LOL