Trinity is not logically possible,neither the incarnation
Posted: April 29th, 2022, 2:57 am
God cannot have location as he is a pure intellect and infinite and not in need of anything,a place limits God to that place.
There cannot be more than one neccassery being because:Suppose 2 necessary existents. A and B. If A is distinct from B as a result of something that follows from necessity of existence, then B would share that feature (after all, it, too, is necessarily existent) and the two would not be distinguished after all.
This is basic Liebniz' law of indiscernables,that two entities or objects cannot have the exact same attributes.
Also what differs multiple things from each other in contigent existance is location,time,mode of existing wich cannot apply to God.
But if A is distinct from B as a result of something not implied by necessity of existence, then this individuating factor will be a cause for A (since it makes A exist separately from B), and this will compromise the necessity of A.
Suppose that there are two necessary existents, A and B, which exist together, neither causing the other, and both being necessary. This time, we ask not what makes A and B distinct, but what accounts for their being together in necessary existence.
If either A or B is the reason for this, then it causes the other to be together with it which violates the assumption that both are uncaused. If something other than A or B is the cause, this is even worse: both A and B will be caused.
Ultimately it amounts to this: If an existent is necessary, then everything about it must be necessary. A necessary existent cannot “just happen” to have an equal partner, or, indeed, “just happen” to have any other trait.
the uniqueness of the First is after all established by its being uncaused, and not its being a cause.
The Latin model is also false,because God cannot have events in him and events or relational qua objects cannot have agency,will,consciousness or action,see https://bloggingtheology.net/2016/05/26 ... hilosophy/.
https://trinities.org/blog/?s=Leftow
The idea that God can come into creation is wrong,and the Hypostatic union is not only wrong logically speaking but it is a self-refuting contradiction because a entity cannot be two opposing (finite,infinite,necassery,contingent,unconditioned,conditioned,all-powerful,impotent,omnsicient,ignorant)things at the same time.
See Abdullah Kunde completely destroy christian scholar James White on this issue:
full:
There cannot be more than one neccassery being because:Suppose 2 necessary existents. A and B. If A is distinct from B as a result of something that follows from necessity of existence, then B would share that feature (after all, it, too, is necessarily existent) and the two would not be distinguished after all.
This is basic Liebniz' law of indiscernables,that two entities or objects cannot have the exact same attributes.
Also what differs multiple things from each other in contigent existance is location,time,mode of existing wich cannot apply to God.
But if A is distinct from B as a result of something not implied by necessity of existence, then this individuating factor will be a cause for A (since it makes A exist separately from B), and this will compromise the necessity of A.
Suppose that there are two necessary existents, A and B, which exist together, neither causing the other, and both being necessary. This time, we ask not what makes A and B distinct, but what accounts for their being together in necessary existence.
If either A or B is the reason for this, then it causes the other to be together with it which violates the assumption that both are uncaused. If something other than A or B is the cause, this is even worse: both A and B will be caused.
Ultimately it amounts to this: If an existent is necessary, then everything about it must be necessary. A necessary existent cannot “just happen” to have an equal partner, or, indeed, “just happen” to have any other trait.
the uniqueness of the First is after all established by its being uncaused, and not its being a cause.
The Latin model is also false,because God cannot have events in him and events or relational qua objects cannot have agency,will,consciousness or action,see https://bloggingtheology.net/2016/05/26 ... hilosophy/.
https://trinities.org/blog/?s=Leftow
The idea that God can come into creation is wrong,and the Hypostatic union is not only wrong logically speaking but it is a self-refuting contradiction because a entity cannot be two opposing (finite,infinite,necassery,contingent,unconditioned,conditioned,all-powerful,impotent,omnsicient,ignorant)things at the same time.
See Abdullah Kunde completely destroy christian scholar James White on this issue:
full:
