Mandatory Politeness & Civility Sub-Forum

[MarcosZeitola]

because I personally don't really even give a f**k what all the woman-hating self-pitying manginosphere betas think

I actually quite like women. Of course it depends on the individual woman. But a beautiful woman is a magical thing. I have enormous amounts of appreciation for a beautiful face or body. It hypnotizes me. It's hard for a man to be with many women and still carry around such feelings of bitterness; bitterness results from rejection, whereas being appreciated by women and allowed to bed them makes a man glow with confidence and pride. I've tried to spread this positivity around in the past on this forum, but to no avail.

[WilliamSmith]

So which am I, virulent or a class act?

@MarcosZeitola
@publicduende

You're a unique case! I wouldn't say "virulent" at all for either of you. You both also contribute a lot of thought-provoking stuff I've enjoyed reading.

You seem like a class act sometimes. I'm also interested in your thoughts on fatherhood. (Live edit: Was just proof-reading this and then I was thrilled to see you may have a many as 10-15 children in the long run, and sound like a wonderful supportive father to your kids?? That's awesome!)
But..... then, on the other hand, I recently was struck speechless at the things you seem to have said that about how it'd supposedly be all right for most young women to be "chaste" to be supposedly good wife material, and yet said some young women to be serving in a sort of slave-like underclass as prostitutes to serve as men's sexual outlet?!
Disclaimer I might have remembered wrong, so pardon me if so, but speaking as the man of the forum who Cornfed has described as a "radical feminist," and which our jewish friend Mercer termed a "whiteknight cuck," I'm horrified at the moral repugnance of otherwise virtuous and worthwhile men who seem to think it's somehow OK for there to be a sort of underclass of women being used and abused FBO prostitution rackets.
(Note that if I read that earlier stuff wrong and was off the mark about what you actually said, I apologize and will correct myself, but I thought I read that a few days ago when I was catching up on older threads....)

In the end, it's all "raw" Happier Abroad talk: A very interesting mingling and discordant clashing of interesting and talkative minds and wildly disparate personalities and irreconcilable differences of opinion concerning bedrock moral values.... But that's what makes this forum so interesting, IMO.

Though I'm way behind on posting pictures of women with big butts.....

As for publicduende's case, I like him too, but we seem to have certain significant differences of opinions concerning the advisability of cornholing Pinoys (my view on the matter being: "No, such an act must not be done, regardless of whether they've dressed up in women's clothing and put on wigs or makeup or whatever," vs his view apparently being that it's supposedly OK, for reasons you guys were discussing in other threads).
He hasn't been shy about telling us about other sexual escapades in the Philippines either, which he seemed to be saying he wasn't especially proud of, yet has indulged in. (I believe he even mentioned being involved in some kind of "cuckolding" fiasco?? I've heard of that happening to white guys a lot in various parts of Asia. Being politely propositioned by a lot of women and a few men in Japan is one thing, but sounds like he's been livin' in sin to a larger degree than me.)

I myself obviously belong in "virulent," even if I mean well and can quite sincerely act the part of a "class act" and gentleman IRL in order to show respect to people. But on the HA forum, definitely "virulent," as opposed to "class act."
Ironically, I seem to have a more arch take on morality when it comes to the protection of children and families (and far moreso about protection of women, more than any of the other alleged "traditionalists" I've seen, except sort of @Outcast9428 who I appreciate for his idealistic romanticism), and am just as much a homophobe as MrMan despite my "virulent" polemicism about jews, homosexuals, and my sexual addiction and alcohol issues. *shrugs*

[WilliamSmith]

because I personally don't really even give a f**k what all the woman-hating self-pitying manginosphere betas think

I actually quite like women. Of course it depends on the individual woman. But a beautiful woman is a magical thing. I have enormous amounts of appreciation for a beautiful face or body. It hypnotizes me. It's hard for a man to be with many women and still carry around such feelings of bitterness; bitterness results from rejection, whereas being appreciated by women and allowed to bed them makes a man glow with confidence and pride. I've tried to spread this positivity around in the past on this forum, but to no avail.

@MarcosZeitola
Oh, I wasn't thinking of you in the slightest when I unleashed my latest rhetorical attack on " woman-hating self-pitying manginosphere betas," I've never seen you indulging in any of that sort of self-pity at all, and I rather gathered that you were a ladies' man yourself even before the shoutbox just informed me mere minutes ago that you already had a large family, LOL.

However, don't be so negative in assuming your attempts to encourage men and spread positivity have been to no avail: There's a lot of lurkers out there, after all.

As for women, I couldn't agree more, I love them so much they're pretty much my reason for living at this point. I like the fact that various things I do in my businesses or activities have at least some positive impact on other peoples' lives, but I'm really not motivated by anything other than women. Outcast9428 has some shared sentiments in this regard, which makes me happy.

[MarcosZeitola]

But..... then, on the other hand, I recently was struck speechless at the things you seem to have said that about how it'd supposedly be all right for most young women to be "chaste" to be supposedly good wife material, and yet said some young women to be serving in a sort of slave-like underclass as prostitutes to serve as men's sexual outlet?!
Disclaimer I might have remembered wrong, so pardon me if so, but speaking as the man of the forum who Cornfed has described as a "radical feminist," and which our jewish friend Mercer termed a "whiteknight cuck," I'm horrified at the moral repugnance of otherwise virtuous and worthwhile men who seem to think it's somehow OK for there to be a sort of underclass of women being used and abused FBO prostitution rackets.
(Note that if I read that earlier stuff wrong and was off the mark about what you actually said, I apologize and will correct myself, but I thought I read that a few days ago when I was catching up on older threads....)

Nah that sounds more like a Cornfed type of thing to say. I can personally say, and not without pride, that I have never in my life made use of the services of a prostitute and never in my life have paid to have sex. I would not advocate other men from seeking out whores either; it's a filthy business and what man would lay with a chick who just minutes prior wiped away the liquids of another customer? How disgusting...

As for women being chaste... ideally, a woman a man would make into his wife/life partner/mother of his kids, would not be some village bicycle f***ed by many others. She should be his, and his alone. I don't think slutty girls would make good wives at all. Behaved women, for me, make the finest wives. There's just different girls suitable for different needs... some would make fine wives and mothers, others mere objects of desire to be had our way with and sent on their way with a playful slap on the butt. The problems only arise when one tries to make a hoe into a housewife, tries to marry some stripper or what-not. That's just silly. But men often think with the wrong head when it comes to who they mate with, sadly.

Oh, I wasn't thinking of you in the slightest when I unleashed my latest rhetorical attack on " woman-hating self-pitying manginosphere betas," I've never seen you indulging in any of that sort of self-pity at all, and I rather gathered that you were a ladies' man yourself even before the shoutbox just informed me mere minutes ago that you already had a large family, LOL.

However, don't be so negative in assuming your attempts to encourage men and spread positivity have been to no avail: There's a lot of lurkers out there, after all.

As for women, I couldn't agree more, I love them so much they're pretty much my reason for living at this point. I like the fact that various things I do in my businesses or activities have at least some positive impact on other peoples' lives, but I'm really not motivated by anything other than women. Outcast9428 has some shared sentiments in this regard, which makes me happy.

Honestly, same. But I have this weird thing lately where I have become so ridiculously attached to my girlfriend and hopefully wife-to-be that I cannot really see myself being with another woman... I just always have her face floating before my mind's eye, I compare her to others and they just don't 'do it' for me anymore. It's crazy, really, but I think I got it bad. I can still appreciate a beautiful woman and beautiful bodies and faces will forever remain a weakness for me but right now I feel like I may just grow old with her and it's kind of magical, man.

[Pixel--Dude]

Hey man, what about a poll to see what others think about your idea? It just gives us a general idea of what the larger community make of it.

LOL, well this proves why you're so much better qualified to be a good moderator and member of this "community," because I personally don't really even give a f**k what all the woman-hating self-pitying manginosphere betas think, so don't give a shit about the "democratic" results of such a poll, but by all means, if you think it's a good idea.

However, a more positive observation: Even if we didn't do this on a subforum and have to take up your and other mods time enforcing any special rules there, I can still promise to @fschmidt that I'll respond to his interesting thoughts in his "Arkian" writing and politely discuss the issues of jews, ethnicity vs race, and community building and so on, without hurling any insults on that particular thread.
(With emphasis, of course, on that particular thread only, since I can be counted on to keep "spewing antisemitic, homophobic and transphobic" truths, as I recently had the honor of being accused of doing on the new Twitter by some jewish activists. ).

you should copy their hysterical tantrums in a thread in the Jokes & Funnies section of the forum. Could make a competition of it. See who can get the most mundies triggered in social media or Reddit hahaha.

The poll was just a suggestion. I don't know how to create new sub forums so you'll have to ask @fschmidt or @Winston to sort it out for you. I agree it could be interesting though.

[publicduende]

As for publicduende's case, I like him too, but we seem to have certain significant differences of opinions concerning the advisability of cornholing Pinoys (my view on the matter being: "No, such an act must not be done, regardless of whether they've dressed up in women's clothing and put on wigs or makeup or whatever," vs his view apparently being that it's supposedly OK, for reasons you guys were discussing in other threads).
He hasn't been shy about telling us about other sexual escapades in the Philippines either, which he seemed to be saying he wasn't especially proud of, yet has indulged in. (I believe he even mentioned being involved in some kind of "cuckolding" fiasco?? I've heard of that happening to white guys a lot in various parts of Asia. Being politely propositioned by a lot of women and a few men in Japan is one thing, but sounds like he's been livin' in sin to a larger degree than me.)

@WilliamSmith

My stance on this is "live and let live". As far as I am concerned, you can do pretty much whatever you want short of inflicting pain and torture on the Innocent (which is why I am rabidly against pedophilia and other sorts of relationships entirely based on manipulation). So long one is honest about their intentions and does it with consenting adults, I don't see where the problem is in engaging the front-door of a girl, or the back-door of a boy that has the face of a cute girl.

So it depends on the question. If you are asking me whether you should be "cornholing Pinoys" regardless of their state of dressing, my answer is "whatever rocks your boat, mate". If you ask me whether I have done it or should do it, the answer I gave you guys is my honest answer: I did it, here in the Philippines (Davao and once in Manila), during a time where - first time in my life - I thought I could push the lever of allowed, or allowable, sexual shenanigans quite a bit further up. That's when I "tried" ladyboys but I also tried threesomes and foursomes, I tried sex with identical twins (two different pairs!), I tried f*cking young and not-so-young women with their hubbies watching or joining in, and so on.

At least in my case, my experience was part of a phase which will (very probably) never repeat itself. If I die tomorrow, at least I could tell myself that I am dying knowing what turns me on sexually and what not, based on an actual experience, rather than hearsay or a mind movie.

[WilliamSmith]

As for publicduende's case, I like him too, but we seem to have certain significant differences of opinions concerning the advisability of cornholing Pinoys (my view on the matter being: "No, such an act must not be done, regardless of whether they've dressed up in women's clothing and put on wigs or makeup or whatever," vs his view apparently being that it's supposedly OK, for reasons you guys were discussing in other threads).
He hasn't been shy about telling us about other sexual escapades in the Philippines either, which he seemed to be saying he wasn't especially proud of, yet has indulged in. (I believe he even mentioned being involved in some kind of "cuckolding" fiasco?? I've heard of that happening to white guys a lot in various parts of Asia. Being politely propositioned by a lot of women and a few men in Japan is one thing, but sounds like he's been livin' in sin to a larger degree than me.)

@WilliamSmith

My stance on this is "live and let live". As far as I am concerned, you can do pretty much whatever you want short of inflicting pain and torture on the Innocent (which is why I am rabidly against pedophilia and other sorts of relationships entirely based on manipulation).

First up I give credit to @publicduende for earlier speaking out against Balenciaga in another discussion, as well as having the right moral stand against the utter wickedness and evil of pedophilia.
His own peccadillos aren't a big deal and I honestly find them amusing, my point is just: Thank you batty boys for the candid discussion of what goes on in Asia and Europe, so that we can all find a more harmonious place to "co-exist separately."

However, addressing the broader topic:

"Live and let live" was once my view on homosexuality as well, but now that so many of us were so naive as to take that view and be accepting of so-called "gay rights" merely due to our having a tolerant non-judgmental philosophy about what butt boys or carpet munchers did with each other in the privacy of their own bedrooms, now look what they've done to exploit our naive passive "tolerant" stance:

Homosexual groups (mostly full of and financed by jews, as discussed in that good video by the Straight Black Pride Movement guy over here: viewtopic.php?p=373686#p373686) are OPENLY PROMOTING pedophilia with underaged children, giving children under 10 years old puberty blocking drugs and transgender operations, "teen drag" queen contests, groomers aggressively going after the children in kindergarten classrooms with satanic pedophiles in drag all over the children, and those with strong stomachs can see what they've done with Balenciaga and other attempts to normalize and attempt to glamorize pedophile sexual exploitation and abuse of children, such as the utterly repugnant "panda eyes" phenomenon which is so wicked and evil that even I am shocked by it, despite being redpilled about the evils of the globohomo movement for awhile now.

That NAMBLA group openly promoting pedophiliac sodomization of young boys and child porn was apparently around for ages, but me and millions of other "live and let live" types simply weren't aware of how horrible, perverted and evil they actually were all along, and what their vile intentions were, as well as how well organized and funded they were.
Goddamit, I'm "doing that thing" again and losing control of myself in my passion, but god !@#$ing dammit, filthy digusting jews and homosexuals, they're going to !@#$ing pay for what they've done. THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY!
Look at this disgusting jew Allen Ginsberg my fellow antisemites @Outcast9428 @gsjackson @Pixel--dude @Lucas88:


There is hope, though, because the enemy is being exposed:
The Epstein Island "Mossad Honeypot" scandal "Pizzagate" and the positive side of the so-called "Me Too" movement (which I approve of overall rather than disapprove of, being the forum's #1 most unabashed "radical feminist" to use Cornfed's term, or "white knight cuck / simp" to use our humorous jewish troll friend Mercer's term) has been exposing jews and homosexuals, pedophiles, and sex traffickers.

Black African nations and even some Eastern European nations are swinging in the direction of criminalizing homosexuality and taking action to protect children and families.

[publicduende]

"Live and let live" was once my view on homosexuality as well, but now that so many of us were so naive as to take that view and be accepting of so-called "gay rights" merely due to our having a tolerant non-judgmental philosophy about what butt boys or carpet munchers did with each other in the privacy of their own bedrooms, now look what they've done to exploit our naive passive "tolerant" stance:

Homosexual groups (mostly full of and financed by jews, as discussed in that good video by the Straight Black Pride Movement guy over here: viewtopic.php?p=373686#p373686) are OPENLY PROMOTING pedophilia with underaged children, giving children under 10 years old puberty blocking drugs and transgender operations, "teen drag" queen contests, groomers aggressively going after the children in kindergarten classrooms with satanic pedophiles in drag all over the children, and those with strong stomachs can see what they've done with Balenciaga and other attempts to normalize and attempt to glamorize pedophile sexual exploitation and abuse of children, such as the utterly repugnant "panda eyes" phenomenon which is so wicked and evil that even I am shocked by it, despite being redpilled about the evils of the globohomo movement for awhile now.

That NAMBLA group openly promoting pedophiliac sodomization of young boys and child porn was apparently around for ages, but me and millions of other "live and let live" types simply weren't aware of how horrible, perverted and evil they actually were all along, and what their vile intentions were, as well as how well organized and funded they were.
Goddamit, I'm "doing that thing" again and losing control of myself in my passion, but god !@#$ing dammit, filthy digusting jews and homosexuals, they're going to !@#$ing pay for what they've done. THERE WILL BE HELL TO PAY!
Look at this disgusting jew Allen Ginsberg my fellow antisemites @Outcast9428 @gsjackson @Pixel--dude @Lucas88:


There is hope, though, because the enemy is being exposed:
The Epstein Island "Mossad Honeypot" scandal "Pizzagate" and the positive side of the so-called "Me Too" movement (which I approve of overall rather than disapprove of, being the forum's #1 most unabashed "radical feminist" to use Cornfed's term, or "white knight cuck / simp" to use our humorous jewish troll friend Mercer's term) has been exposing jews and homosexuals, pedophiles, and sex traffickers.

Black African nations and even some Eastern European nations are swinging in the direction of criminalizing homosexuality and taking action to protect children and families.

Thanks for the flattering, but I think you're making a bit of confusion.

"Live and let live" is for those who intend homosexuality as a sexual preference and a lifestyle that does not cause harm to the Innocent. Whatever gays, bis and any nuance in between perform with other consenting adults, is their sacrosanct right and should be protected. Gays, bis etc. are human beings who love, protect and cherish one another like every human being of some decency.

"May they die, and die soon" is for those who, regardless of sexual preference, intend sexuality and sexualisation as methods to prey and corrupt the young and innocent. You may argue that most of Nambla members are gays as well as being "boy lovers", just like those who drools over "Loli" contents on 4Chan are straight pedophiles. However, saying that all gays are pedophiles, or hell-bent on pushing ultra-liberal LGBT and "gender affirmation/agency on children" agendas, is nonsense. You can't generalise.

I hate those super-progressive politicians and unelected bureaucrats, hailing from Belgium and France, as much as you. However, hating on them for their alleged gay or straight tendencies is misleading to say the least. They should be judged and isolated based on their perverted ideas and their push towards normalising perversion from a young age. Nobody should care if their modes of perversion target mainly boys, girls, or children in general.

Case in point...

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/for ... do-scandal

In June of 2020, Griffin advised a mother of 9- and 13-year-old daughters that the mother’s responsibility was to see that her older daughter was “trained properly.” Griffin later transferred over $3,000 to the mother for plane tickets so the mother and her 9-year-old daughter could fly from Nevada to Boston’s Logan airport. The mother and child flew to Boston in July of 2020, where Griffin picked them up in his Tesla and drove them to his Ludlow house. At the house, the daughter was directed to engage in, and did engage in, unlawful sexual activity.