"Foreign women are friendlier because they need something from you" - Refuting My Cousin Susan's Narrow View
Posted: July 20th, 2020, 5:20 am
My cousin's daughter Susan told me in Las Vegas when I met her there before that:
"The reason women in Taiwan or America are standoffish because they don't need or want anything from you. In Philippines or Russia women will talk to you because they need something from you. That's the only reason for the difference."
I assume by "need something" that she means foreign women are hoping to get money, gifts, a green card, or free dinners from you. Sure it's true that if someone wants something from you, they will be more open to talking to you. That's true of salesmen, street peddlers, beggars, whores, prostitutes, gold diggers who are scoping you out, etc. However, she is only partially true and overly practical and narrow minded and misses the big picture. Let me explain to Susan and everyone else.
1. First, you forget thatI had a novelty factor in Russia so I stood out from the crowd, and since Russians are very curious (unlike Taiwanese and Americans) I generated curiosity from them of course. It wasnt just because girls need my money. Not all foreign women and girls who talked to me in Russia or Eastern Europe or Philippines wanted something from me. Many were just curious or wanted to practice their English or just had nothing better to do and see no big deal about talking to a stranger (especially one with a friendly benign non-threatening face like me) because not all countries are conditioned to be paranoid about talking to strangers.
Sure I've met my fair share of scammers, gold diggers, and users/leeches who tried to get me to buy something for them or loan them money, etc. But anyone who talks to strangers or cold approaches girls eventually meets those types too. It's part of the experience and one of the drawbacks, there is always bad mixed with good. But as long as you get dates or enjoy flirting with girls, the risk is worth it.
2. In many foreign countries, people are curious about foreigners are not as paranoid as in America or NE Asia (Taiwan). And they see talking to strangers as normal and natural. Not all countries are cliquish like the US or Taiwan. It doesn't mean there is some ulterior motive. In some countries people are just more naturally sociable and do not have an "ice barrier" between strangers and are a lot more relaxed and laid back. Not all countries are stuck up. If you would get out of the US and Taiwan and NE Asia, you'd realize that as you travel more. You failed to take that into account.
This is especially true in brown peopled countries like India, Nepal, Mexico, Indonesia, Philippines, etc. Or in countries that are primarily comprised of Slavic and Latin cultures/peoples. Or in cultures that are still conservative, right wing and traditional (e.g. Eastern Europe) and not controlled by any liberal/leftist media like the one that controls the US and FORCES multiculturalism, racial equality, gay rights and feminism (things which were considered bad and immoral before 1960 but are now virtues which you are required to agree with) on everyone without their consent, and makes it a requirement for everyone to conform to political correctness. Countries who have NOT succumbed to that and still retain their traditional cultures, tend to be more friendly, authentic and open to talking to strangers, in my experience. Remember that people are not antisocial or isolated or socially disconnected by nature, they have to be ENGINEERED and conditioned to be that way, which is obvious when you look at past history, which I will talk about next.
A common characteristic of Eastern European and Russian women is that they are very CURIOUS and ask a lot of questions of foreigners and people who are different from them. In contrast, Chinese and American women aren't as curious. Plus Euro girls and Russo girls will hang out with a guy even if they're not attracted to him and are not hung up about it, whereas most Chinese or American women tend to be all or nothing, in that if you're not their type they want nothing to do with you. Especially if they are shallow types. (not all of course but most are like that) But women/girls with more depth like in Russia or Europe will be more open to hanging out with men even if he's not their type.
3. America was not always socially disconnected in the past, yet you Susan act as if modern America is the way it's always been. Nothing could be further from the truth. You should know better. (I thought your mom said you were smart?) Before 1985 Americans were more open to talking to strangers, they talked to their neighbors and had more of a sense of community. Ask anyone who grew up in the 1970's and prior, and they will tell you that, if they have a good memory and are honest and no-nonsense and not trying to conform to liberalism or political correctness. Ring wing conservative types especially will tell you this. In the 1970's and prior, one could simply go out and meet people or make friends, just like you see in the movies. It was natural and not awkward with any "ice barrier" or social disconnection. A man could flirt with a female stranger and not feel like a "creep or pervert who should be in jail" etc. So you see, it's not just overseas countries today, but the America of the past was not so socially disconnected either.
In fact, humans have never been socially disconnected like today. Therefore it's NOT natural at all. So why do you act like it's natural? Because you conform to whatever is modern? (I thought your mom said you were smart? Are you only smart in the Asian way of memorizing stuff to take on tests? If so, that's not smart in my book, if you can't think for yourself or apply logic or critical thinking, then you aren't smart in my book.) Let me ask you this: If you were in a typical town in Medieval Europe, or the Italian Renaissance, or Colonial America, or the Old West, or Victorian England, do you think people would all be stuck up and disconnected and in their own bubble and never talk to strangers and never make eye contact with others? HELL NO! LOL. NO WAY JOSE! People of the past 2,000 years were always sociable and normal and would be glad to talk to a stranger as long as they did not look menacing or threatening. There was always social connection and a sense of community. It didn't feel like a crime or violation of boundaries to talk to a stranger in the past. That only started in 1985 and especially 1990, when Americans became more closed off and mean spirited and more hyper materialistic as well. Ask older people in America who are honest, sharp, aware, observant, and no-nonsense, and they will tell you that.
You know, there's a reason why elderly people in Taiwan and America are more friendly and talkative to strangers than young people are. It's not just because they are lonely and abandoned, or are more mature and less fearful. Those may be factors, but those aren't the prime reason. The prime reason is that when they grew up in the 1950's and 60's, Taiwan and America were a lot more social and friendly and neighbors talked to each other, not isolating or disconnected like today. So their era was different in the way I described. If you ask them, they will tell you that in their day, neighbors talked to each other and families were more close, unlike today. The modern generation is an EXCEPTION to all that. So you were wrong Susan, to assume the modern era as the natural default of human beings, as if God or nature created humans intending them to be closed, standoffish and socially disconnected from each other, and not speak to each other unless its business-related. HELL NO! You couldn't be more wrong Susan. It's was a big false assumption and fallacy on your part.
4. Even if women/girls are friendlier to me only because they want/need something from me, so what? I'd rather be needed or wanted than unwanted. There's no comparison. A man deep down likes to be needed. Makes him feel special and useful. It's better than being ignored or treated like you don't exist, that's for sure. As long as the women who need me treat me good and are cute and fulfill my needs in some way, whether its good companionship, fun or sex, I'm glad, at least for a while. It's definitely better than nothing. There's no dispute about that.
So even if you were right Susan, that doesn't mean much. Men still like to be wanted/needed. Maybe you don't Susan, maybe you are cold inside and can't understand or relate. Or maybe you are in denial. But if you were an authentic, natural, traditional, true male or female, and not a feminist, you would understand. (no offense) Real feminine women, who are uncorrupted by feminism, understand this because they too need men and it's in their female nature to. Women are not meant to be independent, that's why when they try to be, they look unhappy, not joyful or fulfilled (even if they pretend to be happy, it's all a facade, we all know that, so do you).
Why do you think women cannot be hermits and live in a cabin alone in the woods, but men can? Because women are social creatures who need interdependent relationships with others in a community, family or tribe. They cannot be lone wolves like some men can. Even in the Bible, in Genesis, it says that it is not good for man to be alone, that's why God created Eve out of Adam's rib. Hence, men and women were meant to need each other and complement each other by God or nature or the creative force of the universe. Men and women were NOT meant to be independent and hate each other, as feminism and the fake degenerate immoral modern American culture teaches. (and as you again falsely assume perhaps) Women are nurturers by nature, and when they fight that or try to go against that, they will be unhappy, which is why feminists tend to always look angry, frustrated and unhappy.
So again Susan, you seem to have made a major fallacy in assuming that women by nature are independent and don't need men and don't like talking to strangers or meeting people or making friends. No way jose! Go to any healthy country not poisoned or corrupted by liberalism, communism or feminism - e.g. Colombia, Russia, Eastern Europe, etc - and you will see that women/girls are NOT naturally like that at all. Some girls may be shy, but shyness has nothing to do with being closed, hateful, standoffish or unsocial. I've met many shy girls in friendly non-feminist foreign countries and they are nothing at all like the closed girls in Taiwan who are afraid to talk to anyone or make eye contact or flirt with others, or the man-hating feminists in America. The difference is greater than you can imagine.
Conclusion and Challenge to Susan:
Anyway Susan, I hope you consider all the above, and understand why your statement above is narrow and misses the big picture. Your mom said you are smart. If so, then why can't you have an open intelligent dialogue or debate about this? Why can't you reply to my points above with a point-by-point response like intellectuals do in a discussion or debate? You don't seem to have the patience for such things. You seem to like to make short simple statements and leave it at that. That's my impression of your personality from my observation. If I am wrong, then show me. Your mom said you are smart, if that's so then where are your articles and essays that demonstrate you can think critically or intellectually with reason and logic, and make logical arguments to support your thesis like intellectuals and academics do?
All I see Susan, is that you have a site about jewelry with images of jewelry, at www.liveordieglamorously.com. Nothing more. Don't you have anything intellectual or intelligent? If not, then why does your mom say you're smart? Just because you can memorize data in textbooks and remember everything for an exam? Or memorize instructions in a manual about how to set up a cabinet or desk piece-by-piece and figure it out on your own without a man's help? If so, that's nice but I wouldn't call that smart, anymore than I would call a copy machine smart because it's good at copying papers. Memorizing/copying is just what typical Asians are good at. It's nothing special. Even Janet Hsieh is good at that. It doesn't make you special or unique, especially if you have no original or new ideas, nor any evidence of any unique/original qualities or traits you have. So how exactly are you smart? In what way? Was your mom just speaking out of pride? Either way, her definition of smart and mine don't seem to be the same.
Why am I the only one of your relatives Susan - and perhaps the only person with Taiwanese blood (not to brag) - who can think outside the box and debate issues like this point-by-point with logical arguments? No one else among our relatives can do that. Why? All our other cousins just want to be left alone. None of them can have an open intelligent discussion. Why? Even on TV and in movies, people have intelligent discussions. So why are none of my Taiwanese relatives, including Americanized ones like you, capable of that? Is it because you don't want to? If so, why?
I've noticed that American women can hold intelligent conversations if they want to. But they choose to ignore and be abrupt with strangers most of the time. Is that the case with you too? Perhaps you don't care and don't give a shit, so you don't want to waste your time replying to this point-by-point, or you lack the intelligence and cognitive skills to do so? Who knows. Either way, there is no observable evidence that you're "very smart" as your mom claims (no offense). If I am wrong, can you show me? What areas are you smart in exactly?
Anyway, let me know what you think of all this Susan. Sorry this turned out to be so long winded, and sorry if any part of this letter/post to you sounds offensive or insulting. I am just brutally honest and candid and like to tell it like it is, and call a spade a spade. I'm not a fake BSer. Thanks for reading if you got this far. I'm going to post this in my forum and see what everyone else thinks. Hope you enjoy the feedback in my forum to this.
"The reason women in Taiwan or America are standoffish because they don't need or want anything from you. In Philippines or Russia women will talk to you because they need something from you. That's the only reason for the difference."
I assume by "need something" that she means foreign women are hoping to get money, gifts, a green card, or free dinners from you. Sure it's true that if someone wants something from you, they will be more open to talking to you. That's true of salesmen, street peddlers, beggars, whores, prostitutes, gold diggers who are scoping you out, etc. However, she is only partially true and overly practical and narrow minded and misses the big picture. Let me explain to Susan and everyone else.
1. First, you forget thatI had a novelty factor in Russia so I stood out from the crowd, and since Russians are very curious (unlike Taiwanese and Americans) I generated curiosity from them of course. It wasnt just because girls need my money. Not all foreign women and girls who talked to me in Russia or Eastern Europe or Philippines wanted something from me. Many were just curious or wanted to practice their English or just had nothing better to do and see no big deal about talking to a stranger (especially one with a friendly benign non-threatening face like me) because not all countries are conditioned to be paranoid about talking to strangers.
Sure I've met my fair share of scammers, gold diggers, and users/leeches who tried to get me to buy something for them or loan them money, etc. But anyone who talks to strangers or cold approaches girls eventually meets those types too. It's part of the experience and one of the drawbacks, there is always bad mixed with good. But as long as you get dates or enjoy flirting with girls, the risk is worth it.
2. In many foreign countries, people are curious about foreigners are not as paranoid as in America or NE Asia (Taiwan). And they see talking to strangers as normal and natural. Not all countries are cliquish like the US or Taiwan. It doesn't mean there is some ulterior motive. In some countries people are just more naturally sociable and do not have an "ice barrier" between strangers and are a lot more relaxed and laid back. Not all countries are stuck up. If you would get out of the US and Taiwan and NE Asia, you'd realize that as you travel more. You failed to take that into account.
This is especially true in brown peopled countries like India, Nepal, Mexico, Indonesia, Philippines, etc. Or in countries that are primarily comprised of Slavic and Latin cultures/peoples. Or in cultures that are still conservative, right wing and traditional (e.g. Eastern Europe) and not controlled by any liberal/leftist media like the one that controls the US and FORCES multiculturalism, racial equality, gay rights and feminism (things which were considered bad and immoral before 1960 but are now virtues which you are required to agree with) on everyone without their consent, and makes it a requirement for everyone to conform to political correctness. Countries who have NOT succumbed to that and still retain their traditional cultures, tend to be more friendly, authentic and open to talking to strangers, in my experience. Remember that people are not antisocial or isolated or socially disconnected by nature, they have to be ENGINEERED and conditioned to be that way, which is obvious when you look at past history, which I will talk about next.
A common characteristic of Eastern European and Russian women is that they are very CURIOUS and ask a lot of questions of foreigners and people who are different from them. In contrast, Chinese and American women aren't as curious. Plus Euro girls and Russo girls will hang out with a guy even if they're not attracted to him and are not hung up about it, whereas most Chinese or American women tend to be all or nothing, in that if you're not their type they want nothing to do with you. Especially if they are shallow types. (not all of course but most are like that) But women/girls with more depth like in Russia or Europe will be more open to hanging out with men even if he's not their type.
3. America was not always socially disconnected in the past, yet you Susan act as if modern America is the way it's always been. Nothing could be further from the truth. You should know better. (I thought your mom said you were smart?) Before 1985 Americans were more open to talking to strangers, they talked to their neighbors and had more of a sense of community. Ask anyone who grew up in the 1970's and prior, and they will tell you that, if they have a good memory and are honest and no-nonsense and not trying to conform to liberalism or political correctness. Ring wing conservative types especially will tell you this. In the 1970's and prior, one could simply go out and meet people or make friends, just like you see in the movies. It was natural and not awkward with any "ice barrier" or social disconnection. A man could flirt with a female stranger and not feel like a "creep or pervert who should be in jail" etc. So you see, it's not just overseas countries today, but the America of the past was not so socially disconnected either.
In fact, humans have never been socially disconnected like today. Therefore it's NOT natural at all. So why do you act like it's natural? Because you conform to whatever is modern? (I thought your mom said you were smart? Are you only smart in the Asian way of memorizing stuff to take on tests? If so, that's not smart in my book, if you can't think for yourself or apply logic or critical thinking, then you aren't smart in my book.) Let me ask you this: If you were in a typical town in Medieval Europe, or the Italian Renaissance, or Colonial America, or the Old West, or Victorian England, do you think people would all be stuck up and disconnected and in their own bubble and never talk to strangers and never make eye contact with others? HELL NO! LOL. NO WAY JOSE! People of the past 2,000 years were always sociable and normal and would be glad to talk to a stranger as long as they did not look menacing or threatening. There was always social connection and a sense of community. It didn't feel like a crime or violation of boundaries to talk to a stranger in the past. That only started in 1985 and especially 1990, when Americans became more closed off and mean spirited and more hyper materialistic as well. Ask older people in America who are honest, sharp, aware, observant, and no-nonsense, and they will tell you that.
You know, there's a reason why elderly people in Taiwan and America are more friendly and talkative to strangers than young people are. It's not just because they are lonely and abandoned, or are more mature and less fearful. Those may be factors, but those aren't the prime reason. The prime reason is that when they grew up in the 1950's and 60's, Taiwan and America were a lot more social and friendly and neighbors talked to each other, not isolating or disconnected like today. So their era was different in the way I described. If you ask them, they will tell you that in their day, neighbors talked to each other and families were more close, unlike today. The modern generation is an EXCEPTION to all that. So you were wrong Susan, to assume the modern era as the natural default of human beings, as if God or nature created humans intending them to be closed, standoffish and socially disconnected from each other, and not speak to each other unless its business-related. HELL NO! You couldn't be more wrong Susan. It's was a big false assumption and fallacy on your part.
4. Even if women/girls are friendlier to me only because they want/need something from me, so what? I'd rather be needed or wanted than unwanted. There's no comparison. A man deep down likes to be needed. Makes him feel special and useful. It's better than being ignored or treated like you don't exist, that's for sure. As long as the women who need me treat me good and are cute and fulfill my needs in some way, whether its good companionship, fun or sex, I'm glad, at least for a while. It's definitely better than nothing. There's no dispute about that.
So even if you were right Susan, that doesn't mean much. Men still like to be wanted/needed. Maybe you don't Susan, maybe you are cold inside and can't understand or relate. Or maybe you are in denial. But if you were an authentic, natural, traditional, true male or female, and not a feminist, you would understand. (no offense) Real feminine women, who are uncorrupted by feminism, understand this because they too need men and it's in their female nature to. Women are not meant to be independent, that's why when they try to be, they look unhappy, not joyful or fulfilled (even if they pretend to be happy, it's all a facade, we all know that, so do you).
Why do you think women cannot be hermits and live in a cabin alone in the woods, but men can? Because women are social creatures who need interdependent relationships with others in a community, family or tribe. They cannot be lone wolves like some men can. Even in the Bible, in Genesis, it says that it is not good for man to be alone, that's why God created Eve out of Adam's rib. Hence, men and women were meant to need each other and complement each other by God or nature or the creative force of the universe. Men and women were NOT meant to be independent and hate each other, as feminism and the fake degenerate immoral modern American culture teaches. (and as you again falsely assume perhaps) Women are nurturers by nature, and when they fight that or try to go against that, they will be unhappy, which is why feminists tend to always look angry, frustrated and unhappy.
So again Susan, you seem to have made a major fallacy in assuming that women by nature are independent and don't need men and don't like talking to strangers or meeting people or making friends. No way jose! Go to any healthy country not poisoned or corrupted by liberalism, communism or feminism - e.g. Colombia, Russia, Eastern Europe, etc - and you will see that women/girls are NOT naturally like that at all. Some girls may be shy, but shyness has nothing to do with being closed, hateful, standoffish or unsocial. I've met many shy girls in friendly non-feminist foreign countries and they are nothing at all like the closed girls in Taiwan who are afraid to talk to anyone or make eye contact or flirt with others, or the man-hating feminists in America. The difference is greater than you can imagine.
Conclusion and Challenge to Susan:
Anyway Susan, I hope you consider all the above, and understand why your statement above is narrow and misses the big picture. Your mom said you are smart. If so, then why can't you have an open intelligent dialogue or debate about this? Why can't you reply to my points above with a point-by-point response like intellectuals do in a discussion or debate? You don't seem to have the patience for such things. You seem to like to make short simple statements and leave it at that. That's my impression of your personality from my observation. If I am wrong, then show me. Your mom said you are smart, if that's so then where are your articles and essays that demonstrate you can think critically or intellectually with reason and logic, and make logical arguments to support your thesis like intellectuals and academics do?
All I see Susan, is that you have a site about jewelry with images of jewelry, at www.liveordieglamorously.com. Nothing more. Don't you have anything intellectual or intelligent? If not, then why does your mom say you're smart? Just because you can memorize data in textbooks and remember everything for an exam? Or memorize instructions in a manual about how to set up a cabinet or desk piece-by-piece and figure it out on your own without a man's help? If so, that's nice but I wouldn't call that smart, anymore than I would call a copy machine smart because it's good at copying papers. Memorizing/copying is just what typical Asians are good at. It's nothing special. Even Janet Hsieh is good at that. It doesn't make you special or unique, especially if you have no original or new ideas, nor any evidence of any unique/original qualities or traits you have. So how exactly are you smart? In what way? Was your mom just speaking out of pride? Either way, her definition of smart and mine don't seem to be the same.
Why am I the only one of your relatives Susan - and perhaps the only person with Taiwanese blood (not to brag) - who can think outside the box and debate issues like this point-by-point with logical arguments? No one else among our relatives can do that. Why? All our other cousins just want to be left alone. None of them can have an open intelligent discussion. Why? Even on TV and in movies, people have intelligent discussions. So why are none of my Taiwanese relatives, including Americanized ones like you, capable of that? Is it because you don't want to? If so, why?
I've noticed that American women can hold intelligent conversations if they want to. But they choose to ignore and be abrupt with strangers most of the time. Is that the case with you too? Perhaps you don't care and don't give a shit, so you don't want to waste your time replying to this point-by-point, or you lack the intelligence and cognitive skills to do so? Who knows. Either way, there is no observable evidence that you're "very smart" as your mom claims (no offense). If I am wrong, can you show me? What areas are you smart in exactly?
Anyway, let me know what you think of all this Susan. Sorry this turned out to be so long winded, and sorry if any part of this letter/post to you sounds offensive or insulting. I am just brutally honest and candid and like to tell it like it is, and call a spade a spade. I'm not a fake BSer. Thanks for reading if you got this far. I'm going to post this in my forum and see what everyone else thinks. Hope you enjoy the feedback in my forum to this.