Something I wrote to Alex, who believes Knox is innocent:
Btw bro. I been reading a book recently on kindle called "Deceit: The Murder of Meredit Kercher" by Nick Van Der Leek. It is quite amazing. I could not put it down for hours. The author is a genius in crime solving. He goes through the case with a fine tooth comb and dissects it meticulously.
https://www.amazon.com/DECEIT-Meredith- ... 00Y9CS69C/
Ill bet u 100 dollars that if u were to read it you would change your mind about the knox case. Because he brings up many details about the case that most people dont know. Details about the background of the case and the context and amanda knoxs past history that u didn't know about. It gives amanda knox a real motive for the murder that makes sense when u understand the environment and context of the few weeks before the murder and what led her to choose Perugia, Italy, etc. It makes a lot of sense. Youd be impressed if u read it bro guaranteed. And you would probably change your mind too and agree that its very plausible for knox to be guilty.
The author does not say Knox is guilty or innocent but he shows all the deceit and red flags that everyone misses and that add up cumulatively to a lot. For example did u know that Knox had an arrest in Seattle for throwing rocks at police cars during a riot. Another time she staged a burglary as a prank too.
Also on the train in September she slept with a cocaine dealer she met on the train in italy. Probably in exchange for free cocaine. So she was a cocaine addict too. And its well known that cocaine can make u feel violent and invincible even if u are normally not a violent person. Once u are addicted u lose your morals.
Patrick Lumumba said knox had no soul. she was dead inside. Thats how cocaine addicts are.
Sollecito also had a history with drugs and cocaine. Not just marijuana.
Most likely knox went to perugia for the drug party life with no rules. Thats what attracted her to that place. Perugia is the drug capital of italy.
So all this definitely raises the plausibility that Amanda Knox is guilty. For sure. You agree?
So u see knox is not as innocent as her parents claim. Also cocaine addicts need money because cocaine is expensive. So knox could have stolen merediths 250 pounds and that could have started a fight which escalated to murder. Guede also needed money because the rent was due November 1 and he had no money and no drug sales. So both guede and knox had desperate need for money. Its a fact that merediths 250 pounds cash was stolen. So someone took it. This could have led to a fight which escalated and got more and more violent.
The police did not test Knox or Sollecito for drugs. They forgot to. Because Knox was not a suspect until 5 days later. But there's circumstantial evidence for cocaine use. The books goes into many details and testimonies.
Also if u research false confessions, you will see that false confessions only come from those with low IQ and are uneducated. And even when false confessions happen they usually implicate themselves. No one implicates an innocent person. Thats never been documented to happen.
Remember the reason Knox implicated Lumumba was because Sollecito admitted that Knox was not with him. He said she was out from 9pm to 1am. So she lost her alibi. In addiction sollecito lost his alibi too. It was a major mistake. Both lost their alibi at the same time. Why would Sollecito change his story and claim Knox was not with him?
Btw the book said recently Sollecito said he formally retracts Knox's alibi and now claims that she was not with him that night. He now says knox was out between 9pm and 1am. So currently Knox has no more alibi from Sollecito.
There are also many clues. For example it was freezing cold and knox did not wear a jacket like everyone else. Only a cocaine addict would feel warm. Plus she was giddy and not tired. The book gives many examples. Furthermore, a load of laundry with merediths clothes was in the washer. Her italian roommates attested that they were merediths clothes. That means someone tried to wash the blood from her clothes. Right? A burglar would not have had time to wash her clothes.
Another important thing.
If a girl bleeds to death from her neck from a knife wound, there should be a large pool of blood on the floor. Like when u take two large coke bottles and pour them onto the floor. The spill would cover the floor. Much more than in the photos of merediths room which showed only some blood, not a big pool. Everyone misses that fact. It means that someone spent a lot of time to clean up all the blood from the floor which should have been large and spread out. Who would have the time or towels and rags to clean up a large spill of blood and get rid of the towels and rags? It indicates a clean up of the evidence right? Where is all the missing blood? Thats another crucial piece that we all missed.
One more interesting thing about the knox case. Amanda's lamp from her room was in Meredith's room where she was lying dead. So Meredith's room had two lamps, hers and Amanda's. Thats a bit strange and indicates that two lamps were used to light the floor during the clean up of the blood or cover up effort after the murder. Thats what it implies. It's suggestive.
Anyway, the author, Nick Van Der Leek, also has a long series on YouTube where he dissects the Amanda Knox case, which goes on for over 12 hours. Its interesting and extremely meticulous. Hes a genius in crime solving. Just like u are with hardware. Lol. He analyzes every little detail with a fine tooth comb. You should listen to it sometime. It has many hours of analysis. Let me send u the link.
Heres the playlist from true crime rocket science. It has 9 videos and 12 hours of analysis of the Knox case. The detail will impress you for sure. And perhaps change your mind too.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... LQjTrNxndu
Here's the first part.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUGeP10aBb0
After u hear his deep analyses of hundreds of details and points and questions i guarantee you will change your mind at least 20 or 30 percent. The true crime rocket science guy is a genius. Not many people are genius when it comes to crime solving. He is one of them. You will be impressed.