Happier Abroad Forum Community

The article points out that after reaching a peak, IQs are now decreasing. To me the reasons seem obvious: The increasing reproduction of inferior races at the expense of whites and east Asians, the selectional bias in favor of stupid assholes among all races, the feminization of education and various chemical means of stupification.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... cline.html

Very good Cornfed.

Recognizing your problem and realizing how it applies directly to you is the first step toward resolving it. Way to take ownership of your issue! We all knew this about you a long time ago, but now you are in a position to work towards getting a clue. Bravo!

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:Very good Cornfed.

Recognizing your problem and realizing how it applies directly to you is the first step toward resolving it. Way to take ownership of your issue! We all knew this about you a long time ago, but now you are in a position to work towards getting a clue. Bravo!

Eh? The problem is the likes of you breeding like the pestilence you are and causing your inferior simian genes to cross the species barrier and contaminate the human population. I suppose people like me are also part of the problem in that we are succumbing to elite pressure to not breed as much as we ought to.

Idiocracy explains the problem in a way that even today's low IQ people can understand.

http://www.videobash.com/video_show/idi ... tro-245281

And these posts are for those whose IQ hasn't yet suffered:

http://thatincelblogger.wordpress.com/2 ... ent-truth/
http://www.scripturist.org/Human-Evolut ... 95955.html

Cornfed wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ ... cline.html

"The most pessimistic explanation as to why humans seem to be becoming less intelligent is that we have effectively reached our intellectual peak."

Is this sentence supposed to be a demonstration of declining IQs on the part of the author of this article?

.

The article relates IQ to external factors as opposed to the intrinsic ability of individuals. IMO an IQ test is flawed if the same biological individual performs differently under different environmental factors. Of course this is just theory, as compensating for externals is nearly impossible.

As far as the current stupidization goes, it's hard to say because there are cultural cycles that overlap everything. It's not just strictly biological in the short term.

droid wrote:The article relates IQ to external factors as opposed to the intrinsic ability of individuals. IMO an IQ test is flawed if the same biological individual performs differently under different environmental factors. Of course this is just theory, as compensating for externals is nearly impossible.

As far as the current stupidization goes, it's hard to say because there are cultural cycles that overlap everything. It's not just strictly biological in the short term.

From what I caN SEE THE STUPIDIFICATION IS BEING PROMOTED IN aMERICA BY THE ELITES ALSO cORNFED DOES KINDA HAve A VERY VALID POINT. sOME GROUPS OF PEOPLE ARE UNQUESTIONABLY SMARTER THAN OTHERS.

Sorry I hit the caps button. Anyhow a IQ test tells alot about what a civilization will look like, I will gaurantee you our rulers will never admit this however but they can engineer a society and tell you what it will look like to a high degree just by controlloing it's IQ #. They can enginneer how it will look industrial and in a technological state. I will guarantee our rulers use IQ#'s alot in formulating their plans for their socially engineered top to bottom society.

People need to realize 9/11 was pretty much a world wide coup and in your more intelligient communities since 9/11 they have been importing more idiots because our rulers know only the more informed can put a end to their diobolical plans for world domination.

Ghost wrote:

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:Very good Cornfed.

Recognizing your problem and realizing how it applies directly to you is the first step toward resolving it. Way to take ownership of your issue! We all knew this about you a long time ago, but now you are in a position to work towards getting a clue. Bravo!

Do you even realize that you are the only impressed by your personal attacks on Cornfed? Seriously, get a life. You used to make some decent posts before every single one turned into an attack on Cornfed.

If I am to believe the messages people send me, quite a few appreciate how I drag Cornfed out to the back shed and treat him like he stole something from me

Cornfed reaps what he sows, and I shall not let up. I kind of enjoy it

If you have a problem with it, ignore my posts.

.

Ugh! That word stupider is very informal...like the word "ain't" (I loathe that word, not love it!). I`m in "awe" that ContrarianExpatriate hadn't picked up on that....or he didn't admit that he had. lol

PS: Bigots like Zionosis and WindowLicker haven't realized that not one time have I used the word "ain't" in personal cognizant context. This shows that White supremacy really is a pompous, carcinogenic cancer.

What about me I am a BIGOT too! I think everybody should own a black man or 2.

Moretorque wrote:What about me I am a BIGOT too! I think everybody should own a black man or 2.

I forgot how unfetteredly bereft you are of intelligence. Florida is a piece of work of a place anyway. The only thing that that state is good for is for flying ida y vuelta de Rep. Dom. Nada mas!

Moretorque wrote:From what I caN SEE THE STUPIDIFICATION IS BEING PROMOTED IN aMERICA BY THE ELITES ALSO cORNFED DOES KINDA HAve A VERY VALID POINT. sOME GROUPS OF PEOPLE ARE UNQUESTIONABLY SMARTER THAN OTHERS.

I understand, I'm not making an egalitarian statement. But like I said, there are factors that overlap everything. The article mentions that they had to "adjust" the tests to compensate for people's higher education and more access to information (or something to that effect). But I don't think an average American from the 1920's was biologically different to one from the 50's. That's why I say such tests might be flawed.

Moretorque wrote:Anyhow an IQ test tells alot about what a civilization will look like

IMO it's the results themselves what show it to a greater extent. It's kind of self-defined. Then the IQ's (if I'm right on the paragraph above) will just reflect this. Also, IQ tests don't evaluate character, discipline, ethics, as far as I know.

droid wrote:

Moretorque wrote:From what I caN SEE THE STUPIDIFICATION IS BEING PROMOTED IN aMERICA BY THE ELITES ALSO cORNFED DOES KINDA HAve A VERY VALID POINT. sOME GROUPS OF PEOPLE ARE UNQUESTIONABLY SMARTER THAN OTHERS.

I understand, I'm not making an egalitarian statement. But like I said, there are factors that overlap everything. The article mentions that they had to "adjust" the tests to compensate for people's higher education and more access to information (or something to that effect). But I don't think an average American from the 1920's was biologically different to one from the 50's. That's why I say such tests might be flawed.

Moretorque wrote:Anyhow an IQ test tells alot about what a civilization will look like

IMO it's the results themselves what show it to a greater extent. It's kind of self-defined. Then the IQ's (if I'm right on the paragraph above) will just reflect this. Also, IQ tests don't evaluate character, discipline, ethics, as far as I know.

I believe our rulers believe and they have the experience to know that in order to create what they want they need to kill the intellectuals as well as real science for the majority herd class. I agree a IQ test does not tell all but it can tell you where a society will be on a industrial scientific scale. You will notice the Chinese had no problem implementing the new technologies and making China modern when given a chance so why can't the blackman do this out of Africa?

And by the way Droid you are a very handsome piece of equipment for a robot. I have never considered asking a machine out for a date but in your case it might be tempting.