Analysis from Alex about the coronavirus pandemic and vaccines.
[11/30, 3:02 AM] Matt Hanson: How exactly do vaccines work?
[11/30, 9:08 AM] Alex From Venice: Vaccines are made with the intent of trigger the vaccine's receiver immune system to produce the "anti viral" protein specific for the kind of virus that the vaccine is made for.
Basically anti viral proteins are too complex to be made synthetically (James Tour top world scientist in synthetic organic chemistry is blatant on saying that there's no way proteins have been originate "by change" at the beginning of the life on earth, as even with all intelligence and understanding and advanced technological tools available to no one is able to make proteins in laboratory due to the too many difficult steps required that makes the process to fail) so the best it can be done it's to "trigger" the person's immune system to make them by providing a "sample" of the virus.
Vaccinated persons are not supposed to be prevented from being infected by the actual virus, they can be infected and can also eventually be slightly contagious for a short period, but their infection likely won't cause to them severe symptoms as their body already contains the anti viral protein (the poison for that specific virus) so the infection will be terminated quickly if it ever starts.
[11/30, 9:12 AM] Matt Hanson: what is behind the conspiracy theory about the COVID vaccine being designed to sterilize people (making them infertile)?
[11/30, 9:24 AM] Alex From Venice: that's a "long way" speculation based on clues of that some financially super powerful individuals and organizations have an agenda that aim to achieve global "birth control" by means that override the individual free will.
As vaccines are given by injections, the moment that vaccination is a worldwide global mandatory medical treatment, if they get to put in the vaccines liquid some additional component that aims at making some people not fertile, then the agenda goal is achieved.
[11/30, 9:29 AM] Alex From Venice: so the "first step" of the "plan" is to have everyone "forced" to receive injections imposed by the government directly or indirectly, which is what is actually happening now.
[11/30, 9:36 AM] Matt Hanson: So is the depopulation agenda inevitable in other words ?
[11/30, 9:37 AM] Matt Hanson: Also I wonder who gets infertile and who doesn’t
[11/30, 9:43 AM] Alex From Venice: I personally don't know. What I know is that the actual health threat posed by the Covid19 is very little and comparable to that of a severe influenza (in 2015 in Italy the number of death for influenza were even higher than that of Covid19 and many were already vaccinated) and the rush to make a vaccine in just few months while usually it's required 3-5 years to complete this trial, and the rush to make the vaccination mandatory, it's all very suspicious clue of untold second motives behind such "hurry"
[11/30, 9:45 AM] Matt Hanson: And wasn’t COVID-19 pre-planned?
[11/30, 9:46 AM] Matt Hanson: Last thing I want is the government to control every aspect of my life when I’d like to be on my path and purpose.
[11/30, 9:48 AM] Alex From Venice: that's a possibility, but Covid19 like epidemic can happen naturally so there's no need to "make" one, just to wait for one to happen at use it as "motive" to urge worldwide vaccination program
[11/30, 9:50 AM] Alex From Venice: I totally agree... for the main reason that governments are made of people who primarily care of their own selfish interests.
[11/30, 9:52 AM] Matt Hanson: Do you see the rest of the 21st century being a dystopian nightmare from here on out ?
[11/30, 9:53 AM] Alex From Venice: I'm afraid there's a chance for that to happen... but it's not sure yet at this point
[11/30, 10:01 AM] Alex From Venice: the main problem I see is that in a future where everyone has to regularly undergo state imposed injection, there's a chance that such injection are used for any kind of untold intents with the consent of the governments or even without the consent by simply changing the substances contained in the injection doses at the time of production without notify anything to the control authorities.
[11/30, 10:24 AM] Alex From Venice: Covid is real and the epidemic is real. What it's not real is the need of "emergency measures" and the need of a global worldwide vaccination.
[11/30, 11:01 AM] Alex From Venice: how do you know?
Based on what data can you make such claim?
Have you read the article from Mike Yeadon I posted here above?
[11/30, 11:12 AM] Alex From Venice: Actually it's well known that many of such measures have been imposed very late (in Italy they didn't start using face masks till May, in Philippines lock down has been imposed with at least one month delay from the first found case of infection) and that they haven't been imposed the same in all countries yet no one has seen big advantages to those countries who have imposed the more strict measures. Philippines has had the longest lock down and stricter but then it appeared to have a huge wave of infection on June but then everything has normalized and the mortality rate it's still one of the lowest in the word, yet it's impossible that distancing and face mask measures had been effective in Philippines as great part of population lives in highly promiscuous environment, with many persons living together in the same small places and with poor hygienic level
[11/30, 11:16 AM] Alex From Venice: anyway seasonal epidemic in Italy takes usually 6 seven months to be over and it affects only about 8 to 10 millions people over 60 millions so there's no need to have the half population infected for the epidemic to subside.
There's something called "cross reaction" that makes people partially immune to any novel virus as long as it's similar to those of past infections
[11/30, 11:19 AM] Alex From Venice: Philippines people are surely likely to have a strong cross reaction protection due to the fact that they are used to get sick quite often, and yet recover quite fast with only mild symptoms... that way they make their immune system more "ready to face" novel viruses
[12/1, 8:45 AM] Alex From Venice: I'm also following "the smartest" scientists, and I participate to many debates about lock down effectiveness. In Europe there's the so called "Sweden case" which made scandals because the government didn't impose the lock down and not also closed the school.
Everyone on the mainstream media and "scientist/experts" on TV predicted a devastating tragedy with unprecedented proportion... dead people at each corner of the streets.... of course nothing like that happened, the mortality rate has remained within the same range of all other countries who imposed hard lock down, including Italy.
Not only that, but looking at the deaths, there's no "second wave" in Sweden.
Please take the time to read what Mike Yeadon has to say about why governments and "scientists" have grossly over estimated the impact of the virus and it's death threat.
Yeadon "IS" one of the smartest scientist.
I share his recent article, not because he's the only one making such arguments, but because his article is a very well summary of the main issues on how "wrong prediction models" made by mathematicians and programmers can lead to totally wrong predictions which don't fit the real data.
I, as a senior programmer, can assures that Yeadon is correct on saying that good programmers that receive wrong or incomplete inputs can make bad models that make wrong predictions.
Dr Mike Yeadon has a degree in biochemistry and toxicology and a research-based PhD in respiratory pharmacology. He has spent over 30 years leading new medicines research in some of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies, leaving Pfizer in 2011 as Vice President & Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory. That was the most senior research position in this field in Pfizer. Since leaving Pfizer, Dr Yeadon has founded his own biotech company, Ziarco, which was sold to the worlds biggest drug company, Novartis, in 2017.
https://lockdownsceptics.org/what-sage-got-wrong/
[12/1, 8:51 AM] Alex From Venice: Dr Yeadon also points out that PCR molecular swab test can turn positive to anyone who had a cold because of the similar proteins between cold like viruses and Covid19 virus, that lead to an enormous amount of "false positive" that would explain why, while "new cases" are increasing so much in this past weeks, yet the death count doesn't increase at the same rate but stays at the "seasonal" rate
[12/1, 8:55 AM] Alex From Venice: I always made an argument about the low reliability of PCR tests and false positives but never came to say that they can pick a cold virus and give positive to covid19 result.
Anyway, I found the for reagents kits datasheet of one of the makers, and I'll ask my contact, which is a DNA evolution researcher scientist at Trieste University, and he is one who believes that second wave is real and justify lock down, to tell me his take and understanding of such data sheet
