China's Three Historic Schools Of Thought
Posted: June 10th, 2013, 12:52 am
Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism in China:
A good overview of the teachings...
A good overview of the teachings...
Our Message: You Can Transform Your Life and Solve Your Problems by Escaping America for a Better Life & Love Overseas! Discover Friendlier People, Social Connection, Saner Cultures, Lower Cost Living, Healthier Food, Greater Freedoms and More!
https://www.happierabroad.com/forum/
https://www.happierabroad.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=19069
Thing is all of those contradict each other.HenryGeorge wrote:Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism in China:
A good overview of the teachings...
Thanks for posting. I had wondered about these VERY different-seeming religions, and how Chinese people seem to accept them all.theprimebait wrote:Thing is all of those contradict each other.HenryGeorge wrote:Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism in China:
A good overview of the teachings...
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/confucianism/
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/buddhism/
this is a taoist priest who writes against confucianism AND buddhism and why it isnt compatible with Taoism.
Devas are more so space aliens.Higher beings of intelligence.in fact they are not ''gods''at all.dewae means beings of light.I agree with alot of stuff that buddha said,but modern buddhism has totally corrupted it.the mahayana in terms of ritualism and their worship of buddha as a god.and the Therawada in their denial of the soul.especially the annata doctrine.Jester wrote:Thanks for posting. I had wondered about these VERY different-seeming religions, and how Chinese people seem to accept them all.theprimebait wrote:Thing is all of those contradict each other.HenryGeorge wrote:Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism in China:
A good overview of the teachings...
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/confucianism/
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/buddhism/
this is a taoist priest who writes against confucianism AND buddhism and why it isnt compatible with Taoism.
(Just for background, re who I am: I am a born-again, Biblical, Pentecostal, Catholic Christian who disregards "Church Fathers" and papal edict.)
TAOISM: I see the useful of Taoism - Tai Chi, Chi Gung, etc. Also as a nature religion, it's easy to see how it arose.
BUDDHISM: I haven't seen anything I disagree with that Siddhārtha Gautama himself said. Seems like a pretty wise Joe. I consider im a saint in the Christian sense, expect to see him in Heaven. Not planning to kiss his foot though. And I have no personal use for all the little god-lets and god-esses he retained from his Hindu youth. At least Taoist deities are rivers and stuff, rather than trans-species hybrids etc.
CONFUCIANISM: I don't see anything positive here except that it helps China and Singapore do business and get rich. The head is higher than the foot. Unh-hunh. The son has to take care of his cranky old parents and show them respect. Unh-hunh. Everybody should respect the bureaucrats. Unh-hunh. None of it does ME any good.
Not that I am an expert on any of this. Just my impressions.
Buddha wasn't hindu.he followed the shramana tradition,not the Vedic.Jester wrote:Thanks for posting. I had wondered about these VERY different-seeming religions, and how Chinese people seem to accept them all.theprimebait wrote:Thing is all of those contradict each other.HenryGeorge wrote:Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism in China:
A good overview of the teachings...
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/confucianism/
http://www.taoistmasterblog.com/category/buddhism/
this is a taoist priest who writes against confucianism AND buddhism and why it isnt compatible with Taoism.
(Just for background, re who I am: I am a born-again, Biblical, Pentecostal, Catholic Christian who disregards "Church Fathers" and papal edict.)
TAOISM: I see the useful of Taoism - Tai Chi, Chi Gung, etc. Also as a nature religion, it's easy to see how it arose.
BUDDHISM: I haven't seen anything I disagree with that Siddhārtha Gautama himself said. Seems like a pretty wise Joe. I consider im a saint in the Christian sense, expect to see him in Heaven. Not planning to kiss his foot though. And I have no personal use for all the little god-lets and god-esses he retained from his Hindu youth. At least Taoist deities are rivers and stuff, rather than trans-species hybrids etc.
CONFUCIANISM: I don't see anything positive here except that it helps China and Singapore do business and get rich. The head is higher than the foot. Unh-hunh. The son has to take care of his cranky old parents and show them respect. Unh-hunh. Everybody should respect the bureaucrats. Unh-hunh. None of it does ME any good.
Not that I am an expert on any of this. Just my impressions.
Interesting.theprimebait wrote:Buddha wasn't hindu.he followed the shramana tradition,not the Vedic.
chk this:
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2008/06/c ... uddha.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shramana
Jester wrote:Interesting.theprimebait wrote:Buddha wasn't hindu.he followed the shramana tradition,not the Vedic.
chk this:
http://sdhammika.blogspot.com/2008/06/c ... uddha.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shramana
Guess we normally get dumbed-down version of history.
I've seen that with science too. Hate it.
Two questions for you:
(1) So now that the traditions in India have largely merged into the modern Hindu "soup", do most Hindus NOW believe in repeated reincarnation until nirvana or whatever?
(2) If so, then why are Hindus so much more warlike and pugnacious and contentious than Buddhists in SEA? Why don't they at least PRETEND to be peaceloving, like Buddhist countries do?
The Chāndogya Upaniṣad, dated to the 8th or 7th century BCE, one of the oldest Upanishads, has the earliest evidence for the use of the word Ahimsa in the sense familiar in Hinduism (a code of conduct). It bars violence against "all creatures" (sarvabhuta) and the practitioner of Ahimsa is said to escape from the cycle of metempsychosis (CU 8.15.1).[28] A few scholars are of the opinion that this passage was a concession to growing influence of shramanic culture, primarily Jainism, on the Brahmanical religion.[29][30]
The Hindu precept of 'cause no injury' applies to animals and all life forms. This precept isn’t found in the oldest verses of Vedas, but increasingly becomes one of the central ideas between 500 BC and 400 AD.
IMO Chinese, Japanese, and Vietnamese tend to lean toward syncretism, while Koreans tend to lean in the other direction.Jester wrote: Thanks for posting. I had wondered about these VERY different-seeming religions, and how Chinese people seem to accept them all.