Marriage and Having Children = Slavery & Insanity

[Teal Lantern]

More taboo questions:
1. How does society expect you to only be horny for one person for the rest of your life within a marriage? Is that even possible?

Society doesn't expect this. This is why there are entire industries (diamonds/jewelry, flowers, vacations, anniversaries, higher end appliances, cars & housing) built around you trying to maintain that failing proposition, and a few more lined up for when it finally goes kaput. Lawyers & courts.

2. Isn't it inevitable that sex with the same person everyday is no longer going to result in any pleasure or stimulation after a while? And at that point, it's pretty much the same as having no sex? Is that inevitable?

Inevitable? No.
Having said that, marriage wasn't created for the purpose of you having ecstatic sex for the rest of your days.
As lavezzi* posted on another thread, common marriage was created to provide a stable environment for the "inevitable" children created when people have sex, while giving guys not at the top of the social structure a motivation to produce more labor.

* viewtopic.php?p=109259#109259

[lavezzi]

More taboo questions:

1. How does society expect you to only be horny for one person for the rest of your life within a marriage? Is that even possible?

2. Isn't it inevitable that sex with the same person everyday is no longer going to result in any pleasure or stimulation after a while? And at that point, it's pretty much the same as having no sex? Is that inevitable?

thats why its a healthy societys duty to ensure sure every man gets one woman for sex within the confines of marriage, no more or no less. if it is this way, you wont aspire for more. you only aspire for more when others get more, otherwise you dont.

[Winston]

A taboo question about having children:

How come most parents, when they have children, some switch in them flips that makes them willing to sacrifice everything in life, including their own freedom, for their child, placing them above all else? What causes this? Is it something innate? Is there a switch programmed in people's genes that makes them suddenly become selfless and willing to put their child above everything, including themselves?

If so, how come I don't feel that way? Do I lack some sort of "switch" in my genes, or a "self-sacrificing gene" that switches on when people become parents? Or am I so selfish and narcissistic that it overrides this "switch or gene"?

To me, a child is like a relative. You care about your relatives in an abstract sense, like you are obligated to because they are your blood relatives. You may help them and do what you can for them. But you are not willing to give up everything for them, or put them above you, especially not your freedom.

[Andrewww]

More taboo questions:

1. How does society expect you to only be horny for one person for the rest of your life within a marriage? Is that even possible?

2. Isn't it inevitable that sex with the same person everyday is no longer going to result in any pleasure or stimulation after a while? And at that point, it's pretty much the same as having no sex? Is that inevitable?

thats why its a healthy societys duty to ensure sure every man gets one woman for sex within the confines of marriage, no more or no less. if it is this way, you wont aspire for more. you only aspire for more when others get more, otherwise you dont.

It's human nature to want more. Sure I don't think marriage is ideal for a crazy sex life but life is about compromise. You can't have it all. So do you want the caring submissive woman or the nimfo who invites her friends over for a gang bang ? I'd take the former any day.

While Western society might promote promiscuity as something "positive" there are still cultures that discourage such behavior and you end up with social stigma.

[Maker55]

More taboo questions:

1. How does society expect you to only be horny for one person for the rest of your life within a marriage? Is that even possible?

2. Isn't it inevitable that sex with the same person everyday is no longer going to result in any pleasure or stimulation after a while? And at that point, it's pretty much the same as having no sex? Is that inevitable?

thats why its a healthy societys duty to ensure sure every man gets one woman for sex within the confines of marriage, no more or no less. if it is this way, you wont aspire for more. you only aspire for more when others get more, otherwise you dont.

It's human nature to want more. Sure I don't think marriage is ideal for a crazy sex life but life is about compromise. You can't have it all. So do you want the caring submissive woman or the nimfo who invites her friends over for a gang bang ? I'd take the former any day.

While Western society might promote promiscuity as something "positive" there are still cultures that discourage such behavior and you end up with social stigma.

In Eastern cultures a man could have multiple wives if he could afford it and there was nothing wrong with it.

[ILoveBlackAmericanWomen]

Some taboo questions about marriage and having children:

1. How are you supposed to be horny and sexually aroused by the same person everyday for the rest of your life? What if you aren't sexually aroused by your wife anymore? What then? The only way you can get sexual satisfaction at that point is to cheat on her and find another woman, right? What other choice do you have?

Good question. You can definitely if the couple keep themselves up and make effort to be pleasing to thier man/woman.

2. Aren't all marriages, or most at least, passionless after about 6 months or so? Don't couples gradually become like roommates, living only to clean the house, pay the bills and take care of the kids? Isn't married life DEVOID of passion, romance, peace of mind and freedom (since children obviously take away peace of mind and freedom)? Doesn't the sex become routine or nonexistent? Are these good things?

That's the problem with some couples they get use to the other person and don't do the things they did to get the spouse. The things a couple did to get their spouse they need to do after marriage to KEEP their spouse.

3. What's the point of spending one's best years or prime years raising children, serving them and being enslaved to them, only to be left old and useless afterward? Isn't that sort of like giving up your life or best years? I suppose that's necessary for the propagation of the human species. But is it better for you? Is it in your best interests?

Anyone who feels that way it's better they remain single.

[ILoveBlackAmericanWomen]

More taboo questions:

1. How does society expect you to only be horny for one person for the rest of your life within a marriage? Is that even possible?

2. Isn't it inevitable that sex with the same person everyday is no longer going to result in any pleasure or stimulation after a while? And at that point, it's pretty much the same as having no sex? Is that inevitable?

thats why its a healthy societys duty to ensure sure every man gets one woman for sex within the confines of marriage, no more or no less. if it is this way, you wont aspire for more. you only aspire for more when others get more, otherwise you dont.

It's human nature to want more. Sure I don't think marriage is ideal for a crazy sex life but life is about compromise. You can't have it all. So do you want the caring submissive woman or the nimfo who invites her friends over for a gang bang ? I'd take the former any day.

While Western society might promote promiscuity as something "positive" there are still cultures that discourage such behavior and you end up with social stigma.

In Eastern cultures a man could have multiple wives if he could afford it and there was nothing wrong with it.

Polygamy is a great thing. It is approved by God. God's favorite men had multiple wives. Americans have no problem approving gay marriage yet look down on polygamy. That is not right.

[fschmidt]

Polygamy is a great thing. It is approved by God. God's favorite men had multiple wives. Americans have no problem approving gay marriage yet look down on polygamy. That is not right.

Polygamy is not approved by God any more than slavery is. Both were simply facts of life when the Old Testament was written. Polygamy is fine as long as there are plenty of wars to kill off excess men. But without such wars, polygamy results in many men not finding wives. It is as bad as feminism. As long as there are men who can't find wives, polygamy is a sin which violates God's command to be fruitful and multiply.

[ILoveBlackAmericanWomen]

Polygamy is a great thing. It is approved by God. God's favorite men had multiple wives. Americans have no problem approving gay marriage yet look down on polygamy. That is not right.

Polygamy is not approved by God any more than slavery is. Both were simply facts of life when the Old Testament was written. Polygamy is fine as long as there are plenty of wars to kill off excess men. But without such wars, polygamy results in many men not finding wives. It is as bad as feminism. As long as there are men who can't find wives, polygamy is a sin which violates God's command to be fruitful and multiply.

That is not true. Nowhere in the bible did God say polygamy was a sin it was never punished. Abraham Issac and Jacob were continually blessed. Thier multiple marriages was good in God's eyes. Monogamy is good too but so is polygamy. Name one thing that makes polygamy bad???? Men who are leading the home teaching God's Word to thier children while thier wives are raising thier children the way God wants them while they are taken care of by thier husband and they also take care of thier husband. What is wrong with that?

[ILoveBlackAmericanWomen]

A taboo question about having children:

How come most parents, when they have children, some switch in them flips that makes them willing to sacrifice everything in life, including their own freedom, for their child, placing them above all else? What causes this? Is it something innate? Is there a switch programmed in people's genes that makes them suddenly become selfless and willing to put their child above everything, including themselves?

If so, how come I don't feel that way? Do I lack some sort of "switch" in my genes, or a "self-sacrificing gene" that switches on when people become parents? Or am I so selfish and narcissistic that it overrides this "switch or gene"?

To me, a child is like a relative. You care about your relatives in an abstract sense, like you are obligated to because they are your blood relatives. You may help them and do what you can for them. But you are not willing to give up everything for them, or put them above you, especially not your freedom.

Yea you're selfish. You're not the father type.

[fschmidt]

That is not true. Nowhere in the bible did God say polygamy was a sin it was never punished. Abraham Issac and Jacob were continually blessed. Thier multiple marriages was good in God's eyes. Monogamy is good too but so is polygamy. Name one thing that makes polygamy bad???? Men who are leading the home teaching God's Word to thier children while thier wives are raising thier children the way God wants them while they are taken care of by thier husband and they also take care of thier husband. What is wrong with that?

You are either a woman or mentally retarded. You didn't understand a single word I said.

[innovatorsclub]

like this tv commercial is trying to brainwash the followers into thinking:

[lavezzi]

thats why its a healthy societys duty to ensure sure every man gets one woman for sex within the confines of marriage, no more or no less. if it is this way, you wont aspire for more. you only aspire for more when others get more, otherwise you dont.

It's human nature to want more. Sure I don't think marriage is ideal for a crazy sex life but life is about compromise. You can't have it all. So do you want the caring submissive woman or the nimfo who invites her friends over for a gang bang ? I'd take the former any day.

While Western society might promote promiscuity as something "positive" there are still cultures that discourage such behavior and you end up with social stigma.

Human nature can easily be quelled for the greater good, however the social constructs which serve to acomplish this are fast unravelling, causing much social decadance resulting in things such as rampant promiscuity.

Of course less promiscuous women are better for long term relationships/marriage, but you have to be careful your disdain for promiscuous women is not caused by anything deeper than an acknowlegement of this fact. You may fall into a trap of taking social conditioning for reality, which can cause you to possess a heavily biased and confused perspective.

[Jester]

As long as there are men who can't find wives, polygamy is a sin which violates God's command to be fruitful and multiply.

So now you get to add extra commandments?

The Book of Fschmidt?

[Jester]

That is not true. Nowhere in the bible did God say polygamy was a sin it was never punished. Abraham Issac and Jacob were continually blessed. Thier multiple marriages was good in God's eyes. Monogamy is good too but so is polygamy. Name one thing that makes polygamy bad???? Men who are leading the home teaching God's Word to thier children while thier wives are raising thier children the way God wants them while they are taken care of by thier husband and they also take care of thier husband. What is wrong with that?

You are either a woman or mentally retarded. You didn't understand a single word I said.

She didn't reply to your point with male precision. But her soul resonates with godliness, and every word she says is true.