Page 1 of 1

The shooter's mom's child support - $24,000/mo!!

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 3:47 pm
by steve55
WTF? If that's not legalized theft, I dont know what is. How can the legal system argue that it costs $24,000 a month to raise a child?? It would be less offensive if they at least called it Alimony.

Re: The shooter's mom's child support - $24,000/mo!!

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 5:05 pm
by zboy1
steve55 wrote:WTF? If that's not legalized theft, I dont know what is. How can the legal system argue that it costs $24,000 a month to raise a child?? It would be less offensive if they at least called it Alimony.
Crazy ain't it. Why can't rich females pay child support to poorer men in alimony cases instead of the other way around (in most cases).

why so many problems?

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 7:06 pm
by targetguy
8) Its tuff for me to imagine why anyone with that type of child support and the kid himself probobly spoiled rotten to the core would have any problems at all. There are many homeless and sad people that are poor that i thought this craziness would happen with not someone so rich? Maybe it was mind control or the psyche drugs that caused this ? Huge amount of money like that should be against the law?

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 10:30 pm
by polya
No Way! The Newton CT shooter's mom received this much child support and the kid was still a screw-up! Shows the system just produces little cu&ts, so guys should just stop earning and change the order to nothing per month in support.

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 10:51 pm
by Jacaré
I was also scandalized when i saw how much that woman was receiving per month for child support. It really pisses me to no end when i see women stealing blind hard working men with the help of the corrupt and corrupted governments. Just say no to marriage to a western woman and get the hell out of NA and voila, problem solved!

Re: The shooter's mom's child support - $24,000/mo!!

Posted: December 20th, 2012, 12:58 am
by marklambo
steve55 wrote:WTF? If that's not legalized theft, I dont know what is. How can the legal system argue that it costs $24,000 a month to raise a child?? It would be less offensive if they at least called it Alimony.
That is just completely absurd. $24,000 a month is just completely unrealistic. The legal system is worthless and completely unfair. Marrying anyone in this country is a financial suicide mission. Reading about how these useless women receive all this money for doing nothing really pisses me the f**k off. AVOID MARRIAGE IN AMERICA! AVOID AW!

Posted: December 20th, 2012, 1:20 am
by Teal Lantern
polya wrote:No Way! The Newton CT shooter's mom received this much child support and the kid was still a screw-up! Shows the system just produces little cu&ts, so guys should just stop earning and change the order to nothing per month in support.
Most guys aren't willing to go to jail for the "cause".

Purposely reducing your income after the payment order is given will be considered contempt of court.

The judge doesn't even have to set the payments to be in line with your wages.

Thus ... Man sits in jail while unable to pay alimony that exceeds his income
http://www.nj.com/hunterdon-county-demo ... le_ua.html

Posted: December 20th, 2012, 7:35 am
by Maker55
Why couldn't the shooter have used that money to go overseas?

Posted: December 20th, 2012, 8:15 am
by abcdavid01
All the money in the world can't replace a father.

Re: The shooter's mom's child support - $24,000/mo!!

Posted: December 20th, 2012, 5:10 pm
by NorthAmericanguy
steve55 wrote:WTF? If that's not legalized theft, I dont know what is. How can the legal system argue that it costs $24,000 a month to raise a child?? It would be less offensive if they at least called it Alimony.
I looked around on the web and here is what I found:



"This summary is wrong about the facts. She was actually receiving approx. $290,000 a year. It started as $240K but had built-in escalations."



"This was not some uneducated, low income hick eating vension in a rural trailer park -- she once worked as a stockbroker for John Hancock and had been married for 20 years to a high level General Electric financial officer. A guy who could afford to pay her roughly $250,000 per year in alimony and child support plus a house in an upper middle class neighborhood.
"


http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/201 ... oling.html