Lol, likely false negatives , those tests are not the best... The PCR test is like 75 percent sensitivity coronavirus at start of disease. They're looking for an antibody one. The mouth swab requires the virus to have replicated a lot widely. Not all viruses do that at the same rate at the start. This one is actually quite slow. You get lung changes on CT several days before it's swabbable in the mouth!Yohan wrote: ↑April 6th, 2020, 2:45 am
Another still unclear situation is about recovered patients, who are testing again positive with the coronavirus, despite tested 2 times after recovery and found to be free of this virus and released from hospitals - how long does it take until the human body after recovery is creating antibodies, so that such a person cannot be infected again, and how long will these antibodies protect this person against re-infection - is the question...
South Korea found 19 people, who recovered, were re-infected (maybe from other people, maybe some virus was hiding in their own bodies after recovery and they might infect again other healthy people. That's really bad, but it will take a while to find out relevant data about re-infection.
I’m really thinking of starting a biotech company... real-time DNA testing for all these dumbass countries and healthcare systems that f***ing got an nice big F for testing and containment of this disease. Might be the biggest opportunity ever , there are a lot more deadlier diseases out there and nobody seems to realize what the technology that exists can be used for.