Justification for the migrant invasion
Posted: February 12th, 2016, 2:39 am
If you have got a while, you might listen to an English fireman's tale of how dysgenics are pouring through the Channel Tunnel into England. Millions of dollars are being spent to stop them, but they are still managing to get through a small tunnel at the rate of about 150 per day, while tying up hundreds of enforcement staff allegedly trying to stop them.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/20 ... 160208.php
This is of course batshit insane. We all know that if they just put some guy in a tower beside the tunnel entrance with an accurate rifle then the problem would instantly be solved. So why the hell isn't this being done?
One might suggest it is because the English and French are such nice, gentle people that killing a few potentially innocent (sand) niggers is unthinkable. This is of course ridiculous. They have been compliant in killing millions in Africa and the Middle East in the last couple of decades alone. So there are only really two realistic theories. The optimistic conspiracy theory and the fatalistic one.
The optimistic theory is that the responses to this easily repellable threat are not happening because of a conspiracy from the top to exterminate the white race. I say this is optimistic, because at least that would leave open the possibility that we could fight back against it. The pessimistic view, seemingly supported by the radio show, is that we are so fragmented and f***ed as a culture that we just can't fight back against this, because there is not even a shred of unity. Everyone just passes the buck. For example, the Eurotunnel execs just want to keep collecting their fees and bonuses, so they keep the thing quiet, paper over the cracks, and threaten to yank anyone's security pass who threatens to rock the boat. Why would we expect anything different from a multinational corporation? And it is the same for everyone else. Our culture seems to provide no venue for national unity, so it would seem we are truly f***ed.
But for anyone here who thinks I am wrong on both counts, I would like to know why you think the invasion of subhumans into Europe is being allowed to happen.
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/20 ... 160208.php
This is of course batshit insane. We all know that if they just put some guy in a tower beside the tunnel entrance with an accurate rifle then the problem would instantly be solved. So why the hell isn't this being done?
One might suggest it is because the English and French are such nice, gentle people that killing a few potentially innocent (sand) niggers is unthinkable. This is of course ridiculous. They have been compliant in killing millions in Africa and the Middle East in the last couple of decades alone. So there are only really two realistic theories. The optimistic conspiracy theory and the fatalistic one.
The optimistic theory is that the responses to this easily repellable threat are not happening because of a conspiracy from the top to exterminate the white race. I say this is optimistic, because at least that would leave open the possibility that we could fight back against it. The pessimistic view, seemingly supported by the radio show, is that we are so fragmented and f***ed as a culture that we just can't fight back against this, because there is not even a shred of unity. Everyone just passes the buck. For example, the Eurotunnel execs just want to keep collecting their fees and bonuses, so they keep the thing quiet, paper over the cracks, and threaten to yank anyone's security pass who threatens to rock the boat. Why would we expect anything different from a multinational corporation? And it is the same for everyone else. Our culture seems to provide no venue for national unity, so it would seem we are truly f***ed.
But for anyone here who thinks I am wrong on both counts, I would like to know why you think the invasion of subhumans into Europe is being allowed to happen.