Exactly. No more discussion needed. Peterson doesn't just simply avoid naming the Jews for the preservation of his own reputation but rather actively supports them and promotes their agenda. At this point his shill status is obvious. Jordan is now bedfellows with that mainstream media nose-gremlin sheeny Ben Shapiro for fcuk sake!
Are you really going to give a free pass to a guy who openly praises Jewish power and even considers it a blessing while insinuating that any opposition to Jewish power is nothing more than our jealousy of a higher-IQ ethnic group, who condescendingly urges Christians and Muslims to support Israel, and who basically promotes the Jewish slave religion of Christianity as some kind of enlightened moral perspective throughout his work, just because he makes some valid criticisms of feminism and wokeism?
Those of us who don't have our heads lodged far up our asses understand that we the Gentiles are in a full-blown war against Jewish power for our own survival and independence. If we lose, the only thing that awaits us is total enslavement and/or destruction within the enemy's envisioned Messianic Age of Jewish world domination (i.e., worldwide Jewish communism). Given the gravity of the situation that we are facing - and I know that you have a formidable level of knowledge regarding the Jewish conspiracy -, you might be able to understand why some of us are not interested in entertaining the bullshit of anybody who defends Jewish power in any way or, worse yet, promotes it. Some of us actually care about the survival of the Gentile world, take a militant approach and are willing to fight against the enemy to the very end. We cannot respect anybody who is in bed with the enemy. Resistance against Jewish power is the issue of foremost importance right now and everything else is comparatively a distraction. Those who ignore this fact or who actively distract us from it are only enabling the enemy to continue to destroy us.
What people like Jordan Peterson do is simply attack the foot soldiers of the hidden social engineers but never the hidden social engineers themselves.
You might like some of Jordan Peterson's stuff but that doesn't mean that he's not a shill pushing an agenda for the elite. I find it funny how many anti-NWO conspiracy theorists accept that the media are heavily controlled by the (((cabal))) but then make excuses for anybody they happen to like even if that person snivelingly sucks up to the Jews. Well, not really funny. I just find it sad.
Yeah, I do like a lot of stuff he says about feminism and wokeism. I think it's good that he's saying things which are in alignment with logic and reason on this issue. It's also something he feels passionate about because in quite a few of his interviews he gets quite emotional when talking about these sorts of things.
Where would a lot of incels be without someone fighting their corner for them? They have no voice at all and are being driven further and further into bitterness and despair. I watched an interesting analysis of The Joker starring Jacqueline Phoenix. This analysis shows how society can degrade into a chaotic shitshow when men are pushed to the brink.
The analysis is 20 minutes long but for those who can't be arsed to watch it I will break it down quickly, The Joker identifies four stages in which western society will break down:
1. No Social Cohesion: When society is disconnected from each other and loneliness is the norm. This is shown in the first segment of the movie where Arthur is shown to be lonely and treated poorly by others.
2. Resentment: Arthur represents millions of lonely men who become resentful of the society they live in.
3. Social Unrest: When loneliness and resentment reach breaking point this is when cracks in society begin to show.
4. The Trigger: This is the one defining action that brings down the house of cards. Without spoiling the movie for those who haven’t seen it I can't go into detail about the Trigger. As an example the trigger for the BLM movement was the shit with George Floyd etc.
I know a revolution is favourable for those who oppose this system of clandestine slavery as I do, but a chaotic revolution, one of which I think the elites are pushing us towards, one without direction or leadership with the aggression of the people being directed in the right way will lead to greater levels of oppression. This is the justification the elites need to completely remove our freedom. "For our own good"
I do believe we need revolution. But not aimless anarchy. Uncoordinated anarchy can easily be defeated by the elites and their well coordinated police defences. What we actually need is an organised revolution with good leaders who take the fight right to the castle gates of these elite pigs! One where people stand in solidarity against a common enemy. At the moment we aren't there yet.
The question is whether this is indeed a goal of these ideological currents to drive people toward chaotic revolution and whether Jordan Peterson stands against that goal by standing up as a voice for those who have none. This is why he's gained so much respect from incel men in the last few years. He also opposed the bill passed in Canada which forces speech with regard to gender pronouns and all the rest of it. And free speech is something which should absolutely be fought for.
On the other hand, his support of Zionism does make it look likely that he's just a shill. And that his emergence as a voice for downtrodden incels is merely a role he's been cast to play in order to prevent the breakdown of society at the hands of incel men who have been labelled as "dangerous" (someone even made a thread about this in happierabroad somewhere) in this case the elite plan could be to isolate men just enough to make them weak and full of despair to the point of breaking (point 3 in the societal breakdown analysis as seen in The Joker) as well as fracture relationships and society in general so that when the Great Reset is implemented everyone will be too disjointed to stand uniformly against it. Indeed, such fracturing of social relationships in society and the promotion of individualistic solipsism means it is unlikely an organised revolution, the likes of which we envision and hope for, will become much harder to bring together.
I came across this video on Bitchute after doing some more research into Jordan Peterson with regard to his views on Zionism and I came across this video about a lecture he gave.
Jordan Peterson is former employee of the UN who helped draft globalist documents and legislation. He is also a shill for israel and zionism, while simultaneously dissuading young western men from getting into identity politics of their own - which at this current point in time is something that the west direly needs.
To add to that - he flat out refuses to touch the JQ honestly, if at all - and does not address the jewish problem. (JQ = Jewish Question. Jewish power/control and influence over western governments/media/finance, subversion of western nations and institutions etc)
He is a gatekeeper and a shill - 100% Kosher Controlled Opposition.
So you could well be right, where as before I had a more nuanced view of Jordan Peterson and a sort of admiration into the truths he was espousing in opposition to the gender ideology and feminist ideology, it would make sense to appoint him as a kind of gate keeper like you suggested. If men rally behind this guy who advocates for peace and acceptance of Zionism etc, they're not going to rally behind someone less known, who might have true aristocratic values who might want to take the fight right to the architects of this society themselves.
Because the whole topic is silly to anybody with high school level biology and the whole discussion is nothing more than a distraction from the real issues of the world. Matt Walsh is another example of those distraction artists. He even got indignant when somebody brought up the topic of the JQ implying that it's not even worthy of discussion. He's just another kosher cuckservative just like that pathetic, Jew-loving shabbos goy JP.
Yes I agree, that is why I went into the documentary with a playful attitude. I wanted to see these morons be made to look silly when Matt Walsh asks them to define the thing they identify as. But later I was infuriated when he started going into the roots of the ideology. Kinsey and that perverted cunt John Money who believed gender is just a social construct.
It's useful to have this information when fighting against this toxic ideological current. This is why I found some value in the documentary Matt Walsh made. Even if people like him and Jordan Peterson are shills, they still share some good information in alignment with truth. Which is why I agreed with
@MarcosZeitola when he said they shouldn't be idolised or treated as saints.
The reclassification of gender and the dissemination of this ideology onto our kids has become a threat to their well-being. As a father I perceive the threat a lot more because my daughter is at risk of being influenced by these leftist psychopaths. So if Matt Walsh opposes this ideology and tries to raise awareness of it, then I support him regardless of whether or not he is a shill.
Is there any evidence to suggest he is a shill? Unlike Jordan Peterson who apparently was a former employee of the UN and helped draft globalist legislation, Matt Walsh seems to just be a right-wing family man who holds Christian values and refuses to speak badly of the Jews. Something that isn't surprising really since the shield of antisemitism fools so many people. It's become an effective smokescreen for the zionists to hide behind. Let me know your thoughts.