Gravity and forms of energy are not really 'nothing.' They aren't matter, but they are something. If some of these fields can be changed into matter, so what? That doesn't affect my faith. The universe is much more complicated in it's design than subatomic particles.CaptainSkelebob wrote: ↑November 17th, 2022, 3:30 pmThe scientists created the conditions for the experiment but then matter created itself from nothingMrMan wrote: ↑November 14th, 2022, 1:29 pmDo you have a link to the actual papers, as opposed to a paragraph on a page full of ads? What other experiment was done on this topic?CaptainSkelebob wrote: ↑November 14th, 2022, 11:57 amGravity is a natural law which is dictated by mass of an object which creates its own gravitational fieldMrMan wrote: ↑November 12th, 2022, 11:24 pmI think you are confusing us with other members of the forum. I can't speak for the other two posters, but I have never had sex with a biological male. You shouldn't be calling men gayboys or faghots.CaptainSkelebob wrote: ↑November 11th, 2022, 2:42 pmGot somethun here for you fellas!!
@Poxel--Dude and @Lucas88 who are the spiritual hippy tree hugging duo in this thread
And ofcthe god squad who consist of faghots and gayboys @MrMan @Outcast9428 @Cornfed
How does this experiment prove anything of the sort? If nothing existed... what about the graphene needed to produce the particles? If there are quantum fields and gravity, is that really 'nothing'. Who made that?Youll like this one
https://bgr.com/science/scientists-crea ... xperiment/
Science creates matter from nothing
Proving that god or some intelligent creator is not necessary and likely doesnt exist at all when we combine this knowledge with what we know about Big Bang and theory of evolution
And couldn't you find a real article--- with the author, title, maybe some key words, preferably a DOI number so we could look up the actual scientific article on Google Scholar or some other platform? I might take a look at an abstract.
Was the experiment repeated by numerous others who replicated it? If it is not, I would be concerned about their experiment getting contaminated with particles floating in. I have heard that scientists found evidence of 8 dimensions. I'd wonder also if what they were doing nudged a particle from another dimension.
And by 'dimension' I do not mean a comic book multiverse parallel world. Length, height, and width are dimensions.
It has nothing to do with a creator or anything like that
Natural laws like gravity have no need of a creator and so the universe can have been created from nothing...
There are several experiments that show matter can create itself from nothing....
Was the experiment duplicated by others? Is graphene necessary to make the photons appear? Obviously some intelligent beings set the experiment up.
That's also only one possible explanation. There is, of course, the idea that their experiment could have been contaminated. These particles are incredibly small. Just one little leak and it is contamination. Some experiments are duplicated multiple times. In some fields, this is the norm, and a paper may have lots and lots of names on it, including names of various scientists who replicated the experiment. Where is the link to the actual paper? I haven't found it in Google scholar. The ad page you linked to did not seem very scholarly.
Something to keep in mind about science, including social science, articles is that professional, trained journalists often misstate and overstate the results of a study. They are often trained in journalism, not scientific research methodology, so they do not always know what they are talking about.
What if the matter came from somewhere that we cannot detect, and their experiment opened up that to happen. I have heard that physicists have come up with evidence for eight dimensions. And by that I mean dimensions like length, width, and height are dimensions, not sci-fi parallel worlds. We can only detect three dimensions of space.
But you have scientists setting up the conditions. Do you think someone was around to manipulate graphene plates in ages past to form some subatomic particles out of various forms of energy?
That does not sound like an accurate description of the experiment, which assumes certain forces were present, and scientists doing something with graphene particles.We have scientific evidence that matter can create itself from nothing
Evidence of a moment of creation from radiation from right after the first moment of creation?We also have background radiation which supports the big bang theory
Creation. I'd venture to guess you know relatively little about what is in the book.Theres a dusty old book that is the only evidence that exists to support the idea of sky fairys and fairy tales
We have no evidence that god exists
Here is a video you might find interesting, an interview with an astrophysicist.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3yOkG6z228
Here is another video from him that discusses the big bang.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYjo2sie8t0
