Happier Abroad Forum Community

It has been said that corporations need women because PowerPoint presentations don't just make themselves, but now they do with Tome. Are the women just kept around to strut around in high heels and suck executive dick? Image generation from tools like MidJourney should have replaced all artists. Most written content could be created by ChatGPT and then slightly edited. You would need a few people to come up with the prompts, but not many. Maybe it makes sense that the elite want to murder most people. They aren't really needed.

I noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.

It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.

These chatbots are similar technology to the technology that predicts the next word you should type on your phone, just way more advanced.

MrMan wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 5:06 pm

I noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.

It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.

Yeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?

Cornfed wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 5:08 pm

Yeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?

I think you miss the purpose of employment. The job of the employee is to suck up to his/her boss to feed their ego. Employees don't actually do productive work. And people (bosses) still feel a bigger ego boost when people suck up to them than when AI does it.

Cornfed wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 5:08 pm

MrMan wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 5:06 pm

I noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.

It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.

Yeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?

Because A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster. However, no sentience yet. If it becomes sentient then all the whoreporate welfare bums, women, and others will be liquidated by Skynet.
All humans will be made redundant and will be eliminated. fschmidt can kiss his eugenics projects goodbye.

Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pm

Because A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster. However, no sentience yet.

Yep, remember when self-driving cars were the big disruption everyone was worried about five years ago? We were supposed to be seeing hundreds of thousands of truck drivers being thrown out of work right about now. That's not even close to happening.

fschmidt wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 6:48 pm

Cornfed wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 5:08 pm

Yeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?

I think you miss the purpose of employment. The job of the employee is to suck up to his/her boss to feed their ego. Employees don't actually do productive work. And people (bosses) still feel a bigger ego boost when people suck up to them than when AI does it.

There is a problem with that view... reality. Sure, there are people who kiss up to the boss. But that doesn't mean employees in corporations do no productive work. You are reading this on some kind of device-- laptop, cell phone, or something. How was that device and the software created? Most likely by a corporation that organized the people's work together to make something productive. You wouldn't have a computer if no one worked. There would be no world wide web.

Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pm

Because A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster.

That doesn't seem to be true any more. It would seem to be easy to use it to write many books to the standards of the average prole, for example. Artists of any kind should be pretty much redundant now.

Cornfed wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 6:48 am

Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑

March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pm

Because A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster.

That doesn't seem to be true any more. It would seem to be easy to use it to write many books to the standards of the average prole, for example. Artists of any kind should be pretty much redundant now.

Well.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images. Fortunately for you, they have not developed "complete sentience" yet. Meaning AI doesn't have the conscious to feed it self and make decisions like humans yet. Still decades away from going all Skynet level.

Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 8:16 am

Well.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images.

It has a lot to chew on and the people that would be feeding it, i.e. intelligent white men, are probably mostly starving themselves due to the evil globo-homo regime and the general shittiness of society. The AI is the best viable option.

BTW, when you think about it, everyone other than intelligent Anglo-Celtic men is really a form of AI.

Cornfed wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 8:20 am

Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 8:16 am

Well.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images.

It has a lot to chew on and the people that would be feeding it, i.e. intelligent white men, are probably mostly starving themselves due to the evil globo-homo regime and the general shittiness of society. The AI is the best viable option.

I Know! t's such a shame! Those majestic white people are slowly starving themselves by feeding the A.I. Such a tragedy..
They will starve themselves so the worthless scums can thrive. It should be other way around!

Its the globalhomo Jews that only enforce their perverse social engineering policies on white nations. The East Asian nations just follow whatever cr@p the white nations are doing. Creating a domino effect of self extinctions.

The reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.

Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.

MrPeabody wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 11:10 am

The reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.

Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.

Isn't that what modern people do? The main differences between ChatGPT and modern scum that I can see is that ChatGPT uses proper grammar and doesn't insult me or ban me (yet).

fschmidt wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 11:34 am

MrPeabody wrote: ↑

March 7th, 2023, 11:10 am

The reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.

Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.

Isn't that what modern people do? The main differences between ChatGPT and modern scum that I can see is that ChatGPT uses proper grammar and doesn't insult me or ban me (yet).

I have also found that ChatGPT is programmed to be politically correct about everything.