Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
It has been said that corporations need women because PowerPoint presentations don't just make themselves, but now they do with Tome. Are the women just kept around to strut around in high heels and suck executive dick? Image generation from tools like MidJourney should have replaced all artists. Most written content could be created by ChatGPT and then slightly edited. You would need a few people to come up with the prompts, but not many. Maybe it makes sense that the elite want to murder most people. They aren't really needed.

Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
I noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.
It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.
These chatbots are similar technology to the technology that predicts the next word you should type on your phone, just way more advanced.
It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.
These chatbots are similar technology to the technology that predicts the next word you should type on your phone, just way more advanced.
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Yeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?MrMan wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 5:06 pmI noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.
It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.
-
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: May 18th, 2008, 1:16 am
- Location: El Paso, TX
- Contact:
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
I think you miss the purpose of employment. The job of the employee is to suck up to his/her boss to feed their ego. Employees don't actually do productive work. And people (bosses) still feel a bigger ego boost when people suck up to them than when AI does it.
- Natural_Born_Cynic
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: November 17th, 2020, 12:36 pm
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Because A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster. However, no sentience yet. If it becomes sentient then all the whoreporate welfare bums, women, and others will be liquidated by Skynet.Cornfed wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 5:08 pmYeah, just like all whoreporate employees, so why hasn't it replaced them?MrMan wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 5:06 pmI noticed that if you ask detailed questions about ChatGPT, there is a good chance that it will just fabricate references that do not exist. It also gives the wrong date, the wrong author, and invents quotes that are not there.
It's ideas on left-wing social issues are drivels.
All humans will be made redundant and will be eliminated. fschmidt can kiss his eugenics projects goodbye.

Your friendly Neighborhood Cynic!
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Yep, remember when self-driving cars were the big disruption everyone was worried about five years ago? We were supposed to be seeing hundreds of thousands of truck drivers being thrown out of work right about now. That's not even close to happening.Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pmBecause A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster. However, no sentience yet.
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
There is a problem with that view... reality. Sure, there are people who kiss up to the boss. But that doesn't mean employees in corporations do no productive work. You are reading this on some kind of device-- laptop, cell phone, or something. How was that device and the software created? Most likely by a corporation that organized the people's work together to make something productive. You wouldn't have a computer if no one worked. There would be no world wide web.fschmidt wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 6:48 pmI think you miss the purpose of employment. The job of the employee is to suck up to his/her boss to feed their ego. Employees don't actually do productive work. And people (bosses) still feel a bigger ego boost when people suck up to them than when AI does it.
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
That doesn't seem to be true any more. It would seem to be easy to use it to write many books to the standards of the average prole, for example. Artists of any kind should be pretty much redundant now.Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pmBecause A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster.
- Natural_Born_Cynic
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: November 17th, 2020, 12:36 pm
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Well.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images. Fortunately for you, they have not developed "complete sentience" yet. Meaning AI doesn't have the conscious to feed it self and make decisions like humans yet. Still decades away from going all Skynet level.Cornfed wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 6:48 amThat doesn't seem to be true any more. It would seem to be easy to use it to write many books to the standards of the average prole, for example. Artists of any kind should be pretty much redundant now.Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑March 6th, 2023, 9:35 pmBecause A.I still isn't advanced enough to act like substitute human beings. Currently the A.I can help employees complete tedious and repetitive tasks faster.
Your friendly Neighborhood Cynic!
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
It has a lot to chew on and the people that would be feeding it, i.e. intelligent white men, are probably mostly starving themselves due to the evil globo-homo regime and the general shittiness of society. The AI is the best viable option.Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 8:16 amWell.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images.
BTW, when you think about it, everyone other than intelligent Anglo-Celtic men is really a form of AI.
- Natural_Born_Cynic
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: November 17th, 2020, 12:36 pm
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
I Know! t's such a shame! Those majestic white people are slowly starving themselves by feeding the A.I. Such a tragedy..Cornfed wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 8:20 amIt has a lot to chew on and the people that would be feeding it, i.e. intelligent white men, are probably mostly starving themselves due to the evil globo-homo regime and the general shittiness of society. The AI is the best viable option.Natural_Born_Cynic wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 8:16 amWell.. AI such as that use preexisting databases based on famous writers or artists so you still have to "feed it" into the AI generator. You still have to train and feed millions of raw data and images.
They will starve themselves so the worthless scums can thrive. It should be other way around!
Your friendly Neighborhood Cynic!
- Natural_Born_Cynic
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 2504
- Joined: November 17th, 2020, 12:36 pm
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Its the globalhomo Jews that only enforce their perverse social engineering policies on white nations. The East Asian nations just follow whatever cr@p the white nations are doing. Creating a domino effect of self extinctions.
Your friendly Neighborhood Cynic!
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
The reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.
Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.
Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.
-
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: May 18th, 2008, 1:16 am
- Location: El Paso, TX
- Contact:
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
Isn't that what modern people do? The main differences between ChatGPT and modern scum that I can see is that ChatGPT uses proper grammar and doesn't insult me or ban me (yet).MrPeabody wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 11:10 amThe reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.
Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.
Re: Why hasn't AI replaced everyone?
I have also found that ChatGPT is programmed to be politically correct about everything.fschmidt wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 11:34 amIsn't that what modern people do? The main differences between ChatGPT and modern scum that I can see is that ChatGPT uses proper grammar and doesn't insult me or ban me (yet).MrPeabody wrote: ↑March 7th, 2023, 11:10 amThe reason AI hasn't replaced everyone is because it is overhyped and still sucks.
Has anyone been using the AI program “ChatGPT”? What do you think about it?
After using it a while, I am not that impressed. It can give you answers that are just wrong. It makes things up. I asked it things like “Tell me about X” where X is a person, and it fabricates a biography which is wrong.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post