Discuss and talk about any general topic.
4 posts • Page 1 of 1
A Womanâ€™s Right To Choose Just Got Harder
Written by Alisha Gordon on November 23, 2011 1:00 pm
In this monthâ€™s general election, the state of Mississippi introduced one of the most controversial anti-abortion amendments to date. In amendment H.R. 212, Mississippi asked voters to decide if personhood begins at the point of conception â€“ when a sperm meets an egg. The change in the state constitution would read: â€œevery human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the equivalent thereof,â€ making what we consider a human being very specific in nature. The amendment failed at the ballot, but since then several states have considered proposing similar measures during next yearâ€™s crucial election.
Since Roe vs. Wade passed in 1973, proponents and opponents of abortion have argued this very thing: what is considered a human being? Is it at the time of conception or after the first trimester of a womanâ€™s pregnancy and beyond? A change in the law would deny a womanâ€™s ability to get an abortion in the case of rape, incest, or a pregnancy in which the womanâ€™s life is in danger, i.e. ectopic pregnancy. Under this law, certain contraceptives would be considered illegal including IUDâ€™s, Plan B (the morning after pill), some oral contraceptives and in vitro fertilization would be restricted. Most frightening about the amendment is that a woman could be charged with a crime for a miscarried baby. Supporters of the bill note that the circumstances surrounding the miscarriage could determine whether a woman can be charged with a crime.
Women (and even men who are seemingly the most vocal proponents of the change) from both sides of the debate have vocalized their opinion about whose right it is to determine what a woman does with her body. With Georgia, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, and California proposing to have it on the ballot in 2012, one must ask if Mississippiâ€™s failure to pass the law will have an adverse affect on future attempts across the country. The language presented in Mississippiâ€™s bill can have various interpretations, which is cause for greater concern considering every personâ€™s understanding of a word or phrase may vary. Slate.com presents a thorough breakdown of what Mississippiâ€™s failed change proposed and gives you insight on how other states may mimic the same regulatory amendments on future ballots.
What say you? Do you think this type of amendment is fair to women? Sound off in the comment section below!
"I appreciate the opportunities I have in America. Opportunities that allow me to live abroad." **Smiles** - Have2Fly@H.A. (2013)
"The only way to overcome that is to go abroad to get a broad."
- E. Irizarry (2009)
"MGTOW resilience is the key to foreign residence. You better muthafuckin' ask somebody!!"
- E. Irizarry (2012)
"I rather be ostracized by 157.0 million (27.3% of the US of Gay pop), then to appease 1 feminist." - E. Irizarry (2013)
TanBoy by DNA | Despedido, Hugo Chavez...Descansa en paz!
Abortion is a "get out of jail free" card for women. Why is it so hard for women to take responsibility for getting pregnant. It takes two to tango, as the saying goes. Use contraceptives and then the problem goes away. Not so hard to figure out.
4 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], starchild5, Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests