Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.

Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife

View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile

Alpha Male bullshit and Evo-psyche.

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Postby OutWest » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:35 pm

Bane wrote:ROFL at Primebait's suggestion that IQ means nothing. I find it ironic that he's saying this while using a computer, (presumably) wearing clothes, and (presumably) sitting in a nice, air conditioned house.

Well it clearly means little to him. What's with this guys photo he is using? Why is he using a photo of Chad White, a male model? What straight man does shit like that?
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1999
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 7:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Postby The_Adventurer » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:44 pm

I don't buy it. First, if chimps and bonobos are our ancestors, why are they still running around alive today? As far as I heard, humans and apes SHARE a common ancestor, which wasn't even an ape! It wws some tiny rodent thing hopping around in the trees. All these apes developed each on their own path.

Hunter gatherer societies still exist today. There are plenty of great documentaries on them in both Africa and South America. They have marriage and, in some cases polygamy. Granted, there's nothing saying these wives are always faithful, but to assume it's just a free for all, with everyone f***ing everyone is absurd.

There are TONS of historical writings of european's first forays into hunter gatherer societies all over he world. If you want to see some polyamorous societies, look to the Asia pacific islands and polynesian societies. Societies in Africa and the Americas had marriage and, sometimes, polygamy.

Here's an idea. There IS NO one way. There is no one classification that will work. There are reasons, genetic, environmental, cultural and more why filipinas are so different from white women. Hunter gather societies in hot tropical climates came out wholly different than hunter gatherer societies in harsh, cold mountain climates.

In the end, none of it makes a damn bit of difference to the world YOU must hunt in today. How are you going to get your women TODAY?
“b***y is so strong that there are dudes willing to blow themselves up for the highly unlikely possibility of b***y in another dimension." -- Joe Rogan
User avatar
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1384
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 4:17 pm

Postby C.J. » Mon Dec 02, 2013 10:24 pm

Ugh don't get me started on filipinos, especially pinays. Even the great looking ones turn me off, because they LOOK like multiple civilizations! They gotta cut down on the race mixing. -_-
Self-proclaimed GAME DEVELOPER GOD
(Hey, do you know anyone else who can make ANY kind of 2D game from scratch and is quickly learning 3D game development? Didn't think so... ;) )

Youth is wasted on the young! But wisdom is wasted on the old!
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1020
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:56 pm

Postby theprimebait » Tue Dec 03, 2013 9:56 am

Bane wrote:ROFL at Primebait's suggestion that IQ means nothing. I find it ironic that he's saying this while using a computer, (presumably) wearing clothes, and (presumably) sitting in a nice, air conditioned house.

all this means nothing in the wild,300,000 yrs ago when we were coming out the african Savannah.Evolution,or better sexual selection doesn't care for IQ because beyond a certain percentage,it means nothing.

did you read my comment?I said beyond a PERCENTAGE,Iq matters nothing.

85-100 is ENOUGH.high intelligence beyond that serves no purpose in our habitat,the wild.

therefore evolution did not select for intelligence as a marker for did so for other qualities.

noone cares if you can fix a Rubic cube,it doesn't wet p***y,because it has no practical application in the wild.

tall,robust,masculine Jocks (especially Black ones)DO wet young nubile p***y,you know the ''douchebags''and ''scum''you guys are jealous of.

robust Black hoodlum=Evolutionary winner aka ''superior''

Nerdy,aspergic,frail Tradcon=Evolutionary ment to not pass on his Genes

what the manosphere consists of is butthurt Hypergamous nerds that are jealous they are the losers.women should like me!I follow my societies rules and I am a genuine guy!

you sound like fat feminists:men are shallow to go for the dumb Hot cheerleaders,they should go for a woman of REAL quality!I am a educated smart woman!men should be attracted to my intelligence!not those hot bodies and pretty faces of those dumb idiotic cheerleaders!
Junior Poster
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am

Postby theprimebait » Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:10 am

C.J. wrote:There's a difference between intelligence and practical application.

he didn't even read what I said:

I said:

and scum?who are you to say who is scum?obviousely the physichaly challenged nerds are scum.from a pure genetic view,they are scum.they don't deserve to reproduce.IQ is a liability and not a asset after a certain percentage,it serves no purpose in nature.

so they rather resort to character attacks,and quoting me out of context,insults etc than adress my premise.


1.they are nothing but hypergamous themselves

2.they have a inflated view of their own sexual value(sound kina familiar?)

3.they think women should go for IQ and being a genuine guy,over a hot hunk(sound familiar?feminists who are so deluded they think men should like them for their smarts and accomplishments over the dumb but hot 9/10 girl enxt door),especially if that hunk is from a race with they look down on and has a high ratio of hunks(sound familiar?butthurt white women and their hatred for asian women perhaps?)

4.if we can't compete in the physical mating competitions,then we will FORCE women to choose us by laws,shaming,degradation and social stigma(sound familiar?kina like feminists trying to outlaw mail order brides and prostitution so that men will be forced to go with them?calling old men with young women ''creeps''?telling men to ''man up''and marry cum receptacles?)

everything they project unto feminists is a reflection of themselves.
Junior Poster
Posts: 828
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:02 am


Return to General Discussions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cornfed, Google Adsense [Bot], kapriolztn, MSNbot Media and 13 guests