Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Should Cornfed be banned?

Yes. He should be permanently banned. His extreme racism is irreconcilable with basic civility, which has been demonstrated repeatedly.
38
43%
Neither. He should continue to be given warnings and temporary bans, until he learns to change his behavior.
10
11%
No. Cornfed is a good poster and should be allowed to say anything he wants under free speech.
41
46%
 
Total votes: 89
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by OutWest »

Cornfed wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 10:15 am
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:10 am
Before you die, be sure to arrange for burial vertically with a black dude, one jew and one baby boomer to be buried over you.
They held you down all your life, so it should continue I guess.
Obviously these tapeworm populations along with sluts etc. are holding us all down. Without them we would be fabulously wealthy and when talking about being happier abroad we would be talking about the solar system and deep space. We can’t get back what we should have, but maybe we can avoid the contagion spreading to future generations. I wouldn’t expect a boomer to have any conception of responsibility.
You are kind of amusing, but your stench overwhelms the humor. Responsibility would mean overcoming obstacles, even all those jews, blacks and awful baby boomers that are holding you down. Instead, you just make excuses for how pathetic you are. Wah.. Way... I so abused! Dose Jews, negroes and boomers is holding me down... Wah... Wah... Any real man of stripe who knows of overcoming difficulty and taking responsibility will just laugh at your sorry arse. You blame everyone except the dumb arse in the mirror. Grow up, you pathetic creature.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 11:08 am
Cornfed wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 10:15 am
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:10 am
Before you die, be sure to arrange for burial vertically with a black dude, one jew and one baby boomer to be buried over you.
They held you down all your life, so it should continue I guess.
Obviously these tapeworm populations along with sluts etc. are holding us all down. Without them we would be fabulously wealthy and when talking about being happier abroad we would be talking about the solar system and deep space. We can’t get back what we should have, but maybe we can avoid the contagion spreading to future generations. I wouldn’t expect a boomer to have any conception of responsibility.
You are kind of amusing, but your stench overwhelms the humor. Responsibility would mean overcoming obstacles, even all those jews, blacks and awful baby boomers that are holding you down. Instead, you just make excuses for how pathetic you are. Wah.. Way... I so abused! Dose Jews, negroes and boomers is holding me down... Wah... Wah... Any real man of stripe who knows of overcoming difficulty and taking responsibility will just laugh at your sorry arse. You blame everyone except the dumb arse in the mirror. Grow up, you pathetic creature.
Suppose the obstacle to be overcome was criminals beating you up and robbing you and raping your daughters. Would the manly, grown up way of handling the situation be for you and your daughters to get on with your lives as best you could within the context of being beaten, robbed and raped or instead to eradicate the criminals causing the problem? Apply that to the situation with the aforementioned tapeworm populations. Is the right thing to do to get on with life as best you can within the constraints they impose, knowing that even if you succeed in having a great time it will mean that your children, should they exist in the first place, will likely be butchered in the womb or tortured to death by niggers at some point? Or do we take back our birthright from the scum and bequeath it to future generations as it was bequeathed to us, or at least would have been if your generation weren’t such selfish cowards. Once again, getting boomers to think about anyone but themselves is like trying to teach differential calculus to Stone Age primitives.
gsjackson
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3761
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Contact:

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by gsjackson »

I've sometimes considered the possibility that Corn and the Stormer are controlled opposition, recruited by the ruling elites and sent out into the internet to scare off would-be critics. The idea would be: "So, you want to criticize the establishment, well join the club of the hateful and downtrodden. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?" The corporate media have always been up to the task of marginalizing dissenting voices, but the internet is new territory requiring new tactics.

So for all we know, Cornfed may be just another working stiff who kisses the wife and kids goodbye each morning and goes off into the computer room to play a tortured bigot hurling himself futilely at the world.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

gsjackson wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:08 pm
I've sometimes considered the possibility that Corn and the Stormer are controlled opposition, recruited by the ruling elites and sent out into the internet to scare off would-be critics. The idea would be: "So, you want to criticize the establishment, well join the club of the hateful and downtrodden. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?" The corporate media have always been up to the task of marginalizing dissenting voices, but the internet is new territory requiring new tactics.

So for all we know, Cornfed may be just another working stiff who kisses the wife and kids goodbye each morning and goes off into the computer room to play a tortured bigot hurling himself futilely at the world.
But people really are downtrodden. If everything was fine, there would be nothing to complain about and no reason to take any risks in resisting the bad guys. What would be an example of a war being won on the basis of people maintaining that nothing was wrong and just having a good time?
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by OutWest »

gsjackson wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:08 pm
I've sometimes considered the possibility that Corn and the Stormer are controlled opposition, recruited by the ruling elites and sent out into the internet to scare off would-be critics. The idea would be: "So, you want to criticize the establishment, well join the club of the hateful and downtrodden. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?" The corporate media have always been up to the task of marginalizing dissenting voices, but the internet is new territory requiring new tactics.

So for all we know, Cornfed may be just another working stiff who kisses the wife and kids goodbye each morning and goes off into the computer room to play a tortured bigot hurling himself futilely at the world.
You might have nailed it! Maybe Cornhead is in reality a black BBW with big hair and long nails working in a counter-ops computer room... Playing the part of Cornhole, the rage'n roid in order to make certain rational points all seem like a big pond of sewer scum.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 6:43 pm
gsjackson wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:08 pm
I've sometimes considered the possibility that Corn and the Stormer are controlled opposition, recruited by the ruling elites and sent out into the internet to scare off would-be critics. The idea would be: "So, you want to criticize the establishment, well join the club of the hateful and downtrodden. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?" The corporate media have always been up to the task of marginalizing dissenting voices, but the internet is new territory requiring new tactics.

So for all we know, Cornfed may be just another working stiff who kisses the wife and kids goodbye each morning and goes off into the computer room to play a tortured bigot hurling himself futilely at the world.
You might have nailed it! Maybe Cornhead is in reality a black BBW with big hair and long nails working in a counter-ops computer room... Playing the part of Cornhole, the rage'n roid in order to make certain rational points all seem like a big pond of sewer scum.
So what differences would you expect from the posts of someone genuinely revolted with the destruction of our once great civilisation and disgusting boomer traitors like you who enabled it to happen?
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by OutWest »

gsjackson wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 1:08 pm
I've sometimes considered the possibility that Corn and the Stormer are controlled opposition, recruited by the ruling elites and sent out into the internet to scare off would-be critics. The idea would be: "So, you want to criticize the establishment, well join the club of the hateful and downtrodden. Sounds appealing, doesn't it?" The corporate media have always been up to the task of marginalizing dissenting voices, but the internet is new territory requiring new tactics.

So for all we know, Cornfed may be just another working stiff who kisses the wife and kids goodbye each morning and goes off into the computer room to play a tortured bigot hurling himself futilely at the world.
You might have nailed it! Maybe Cornhead is in reality a black BBW with big hair and long nails working in a counter-ops computer room... Playing the part of Cornhole, the rage'n roid in order to make certain rational points all seem like a big pond of sewer scum.
Cornfed wrote:
January 5th, 2018, 11:09 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 5th, 2018, 10:43 pm
If he was actually accomplishing anything of merit in his life, he would not have time for it.
In other words, if the system is handing you enough money there is no reason to care about the genocide of white people and the destruction of civilisation. Typical boomer selfishness.
The threat to white populations is self imposed population control, not some imaginary genocide. Many white populations are birthing at rates far below replacement. This makes sense to them from in a hedonistic post Christian societies. It is voluntary all across most of Europe. Typical cornhole ignorance.White subcultures that place value on having big families are doing so quite successfully.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:14 pm
The threat to white populations is self imposed population control, not some imaginary genocide. Many white populations are birthing at rates far below replacement. This makes sense to them from in a hedonistic post Christian societies. It is voluntary all across most of Europe. Typical cornhole ignorance.White subcultures that place value on having big families are doing so quite successfully.
I am about to pay a $6k tax bill. Most of that money will go to pay white females to be hedonistic sluts instead of wives and mothers and mud people to breed like mad. This is why quality white people are not breeding and scum are replacing us. However, if it is voluntary, please tell me as a matter of urgency how I can opt out of it.
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6183
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Yohan »

OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 6:43 pm
You might have nailed it! Maybe Cornhead is in reality a black BBW with big hair and long nails working in a counter-ops computer room... Playing the part of Cornhole, the rage'n roid in order to make certain rational points all seem like a big pond of sewer scum.
I don't think so. Cornfed is likely a white male US-citizen, who had some seriously bad experiences in the past - likely within the US with black people.

After he left USA, he was somewhere in China and Korea, but he left Asia again, was talking about moving to New Zealand, but is now back to USA. Not much known about him, he seems to be hateful against others, who are non-white people or of mixed race and dislikes white people who are supportive to interracial relationship.

Something is wrong with that guy, this is for sure.
gsjackson
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3761
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
Location: New Orleans, LA USA
Contact:

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by gsjackson »

Yohan wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 9:14 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 6:43 pm
You might have nailed it! Maybe Cornhead is in reality a black BBW with big hair and long nails working in a counter-ops computer room... Playing the part of Cornhole, the rage'n roid in order to make certain rational points all seem like a big pond of sewer scum.
I don't think so. Cornfed is likely a white male US-citizen, who had some seriously bad experiences in the past - likely within the US with black people.

After he left USA, he was somewhere in China and Korea, but he left Asia again, was talking about moving to New Zealand, but is now back to USA. Not much known about him, he seems to be hateful against others, who are non-white people or of mixed race and dislikes white people who are supportive to interracial relationship.

Something is wrong with that guy, this is for sure.
Corn's country of origin is one of the great mysteries, which he declines to resolve but occasionally drops clues. I say he (or she, if Outwest is on target) is a Scot, possibly one whose parents moved to the U.S. He has spoken about ancestors of recent WWII vintage as being from the British isles. He was raised Presbyterian, i.e., the Church of Scotland.

Yick says he is from New Zealand, where he did pitch a tent for a while. And he did once refer to the UK as the mother country.

The case for the U.S.: He has been here recently, on the testimony of eyewitnesses fschmidt and Drealm (who could help resolve the mystery by attesting to any noted accent). And yes, it's hard to imagine acquiring such hostility against blacks anywhere but the U.S., though Kradmelder might take issue with that statement.
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by OutWest »

Cornfed wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:27 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:14 pm
The threat to white populations is self imposed population control, not some imaginary genocide. Many white populations are birthing at rates far below replacement. This makes sense to them from in a hedonistic post Christian societies. It is voluntary all across most of Europe. Typical cornhole ignorance.White subcultures that place value on having big families are doing so quite successfully.
I am about to pay a $6k tax bill. Most of that money will go to pay white females to be hedonistic sluts instead of wives and mothers and mud people to breed like mad. This is why quality white people are not breeding and scum are replacing us. However, if it is voluntary, please tell me as a matter of urgency how I can opt out of it.
What did you do? Check the "hedonistic slut" check box on your taxes? You might take a look at a pie chart as to how tax revenue and theft from future generations by way of debt, is actually spent.

The black birth rate has been in steady decline since about 1990. It is just at about replacement level now.
Again, white subcultures that prioritize family and children have the highest birthrates. These include Mormons, evangelical Christians and devout Catholics.
Leftist progressive types are aborting or otherwise do not have kids much, thankfully.

Latinos are the high birth rate category. They may account for 30% of US population by 2050. Frankly, in general, latinos assimilate and typically are hard working people. They are not typically disposed towards conflict with whites.

You are paying taxes at a high level due to the emergence of the nanny state. You and possible descendents are being stealth taxed via debt burden.
If you have not already developed alternatives to US residency and citizenship, it is possible to do so. We have been developing this option in Chile. The Philippines is simply not the best place for that. My US tax liability will be... ZERO.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote:
January 7th, 2018, 12:04 pm
Cornfed wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:27 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:14 pm
The threat to white populations is self imposed population control, not some imaginary genocide. Many white populations are birthing at rates far below replacement. This makes sense to them from in a hedonistic post Christian societies. It is voluntary all across most of Europe. Typical cornhole ignorance.White subcultures that place value on having big families are doing so quite successfully.
I am about to pay a $6k tax bill. Most of that money will go to pay white females to be hedonistic sluts instead of wives and mothers and mud people to breed like mad. This is why quality white people are not breeding and scum are replacing us. However, if it is voluntary, please tell me as a matter of urgency how I can opt out of it.
What did you do? Check the "hedonistic slut" check box on your taxes? You might take a look at a pie chart as to how tax revenue and theft from future generations by way of debt, is actually spent.

The black birth rate has been in steady decline since about 1990. It is just at about replacement level now.
Again, white subcultures that prioritize family and children have the highest birthrates. These include Mormons, evangelical Christians and devout Catholics.
Leftist progressive types are aborting or otherwise do not have kids much, thankfully.

Latinos are the high birth rate category. They may account for 30% of US population by 2050. Frankly, in general, latinos assimilate and typically are hard working people. They are not typically disposed towards conflict with whites.

You are paying taxes at a high level due to the emergence of the nanny state. You and possible descendents are being stealth taxed via debt burden.
If you have not already developed alternatives to US residency and citizenship, it is possible to do so. We have been developing this option in Chile. The Philippines is simply not the best place for that. My US tax liability will be... ZERO.
What the hell does any of this have to do with white men being robbed to support sluts and shitskins?
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by OutWest »

Cornfed wrote:
January 7th, 2018, 12:12 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 7th, 2018, 12:04 pm
Cornfed wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:27 pm
OutWest wrote:
January 6th, 2018, 8:14 pm
The threat to white populations is self imposed population control, not some imaginary genocide. Many white populations are birthing at rates far below replacement. This makes sense to them from in a hedonistic post Christian societies. It is voluntary all across most of Europe. Typical cornhole ignorance.White subcultures that place value on having big families are doing so quite successfully.
I am about to pay a $6k tax bill. Most of that money will go to pay white females to be hedonistic sluts instead of wives and mothers and mud people to breed like mad. This is why quality white people are not breeding and scum are replacing us. However, if it is voluntary, please tell me as a matter of urgency how I can opt out of it.
What did you do? Check the "hedonistic slut" check box on your taxes? You might take a look at a pie chart as to how tax revenue and theft from future generations by way of debt, is actually spent.

The black birth rate has been in steady decline since about 1990. It is just at about replacement level now.
Again, white subcultures that prioritize family and children have the highest birthrates. These include Mormons, evangelical Christians and devout Catholics.
Leftist progressive types are aborting or otherwise do not have kids much, thankfully.

Latinos are the high birth rate category. They may account for 30% of US population by 2050. Frankly, in general, latinos assimilate and typically are hard working people. They are not typically disposed towards conflict with whites.

You are paying taxes at a high level due to the emergence of the nanny state. You and possible descendents are being stealth taxed via debt burden.
If you have not already developed alternatives to US residency and citizenship, it is possible to do so. We have been developing this option in Chile. The Philippines is simply not the best place for that. My US tax liability will be... ZERO.
What the hell does any of this have to do with white men being robbed to support sluts and shitskins?
Ok, you are not able to draw connections between demographic trends in reality vs what you claim. There are alternatives to being "robbed". Your assertion that slut white girls are the growing population, is not so. Your deductive reasoning really is in the tank. Did someone really jack you up with a 9mm or were you just talking about taxes and what they are spent on? Im saying there are ways to minimize such impacts and raise a family independent of it. White culture in America has problems because they voted that way. Maybe it can be turned around, or not, but being individually weak and not raising a strong family will certainly not make it any better. Options and the ability to influence outcomes do not come from a position of personal weakness. Simpering pathetic whiners do nothing. Most storm front types are in reality right out of Monty Python... "Tiny brained wipers of other men's bottoms... "
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

OutWest wrote:
January 7th, 2018, 1:15 pm
Maybe it can be turned around, or not, but being individually weak and not raising a strong family will certainly not make it any better. Options and the ability to influence outcomes do not come from a position of personal weakness. Simpering pathetic whiners do nothing. Most storm front types are in reality right out of Monty Python... "Tiny brained wipers of other men's bottoms... "
It is generally not possible to raise a family in the West for reasons gone into above, regardless of your personal strength. However, the more important point is - have you really convinced yourself that attempting to defend your people from genocide is weak whereas running with the money and selfishly leaving younger people to their fate while hoping you die before everything falls apart is brave? Obviously the exact opposite is the case. At least some selfish boomer traitors are honest about the situation.
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6193
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 2:37 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Adama »

There has always been unfairness and inequity. If we had been born one or two generations ago, it doesn't guarantee that we would have been prosperous. Many men, for example, were involuntarily drafted into wars over nonsense and lies and lost their lives over it. That is one thing that most of us will not have to endure: dying for lies and missing out on life because of it.

Also, there have always been poor people. Poor people still have children.

I would seek unto God, and unto God would I commit my cause. I would tell my financial story, but it is not for me to go saying such things around people who are not close to me. However I can say that God has directly uplifted me out of poverty, without me having to lift a finger.

Trust in the Lord and do good. Stop all bitterness and hate. God doesn't like that.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”