Neomasculinity, Mgtow, HA, etc are just surface ideas...

[BlackKnight]

[Ghost]

.

[BlackKnight]

You have it completely backwards, culture is the production of people. That's why they have prisons. Some people live 2 or 3 cultures.

[PeterAndrewNolan]

You have it completely backwards, culture is the production of people. That's why they have prisons. Some people live 2 or 3 cultures.

Is there a question in what you are posting?

Yes, MGTOW, neomasculinity, masculinism and all those things are quite superficial ideas. None of them address the major issue of the fact our guvmints are criminal cartels.

All these ideas are basically like ants trying to run from the water coming down the path or run from the footsteps of the people walking on the path...the water or footsteps representing governments.

These ideas merely encourage men to behave like ants running from a threat without ever dealing with the actual threat.

The mens business association, on the other hand, is dealing with the threat by showing men how to rescind their consent to be governed and how to create a life they love and create a business model that it is much harder for governments to interfere with.

MBA solves mens problems......because I am bored as hell TALKING about mens problems that is for DAMN sure.

[The]

Since PUA is on the down slope, they are quickly re branding it as Neo-Masculinity to bring in new readers...Very smart of Roosh i'll say.....

[droid]

Why are gay people usually very bright? Keynes provided the foundation for modern economics

LMAO.

[BlackKnight]

[BlackKnight]

Some people have a talent for using a million words to say absolutely nothing.

This is probably PaloAltoGuys only talent lol.

Of course I'm not speaking ideological nonsense so you're out of your game

[BlackKnight]

Since PUA is on the down slope, they are quickly re branding it as Neo-Masculinity to bring in new readers...Very smart of Roosh i'll say.....

More likely an evolution.

[BlackKnight]

Why are gay people usually very bright? Keynes provided the foundation for modern economics

LMAO.

How's your AGI coming little guy?

[BlackKnight]

[gsjackson]

Of course I'm not speaking ideological nonsense so you're out of your game

What ideological nonsense? I am one of the realest posters on this site. I cannot say the same for you, your reputation is pretty abysmal and people primarily keep you around because your insanity is entertaining. I cannot think of a single constructive post or original thought you ever brought forward.

Anyone else help me out here? To find a single decent post PAG ever made that served any purpose outside comic relief?

He's the first person to teach me a new and useful word in I don't know how long -- fricative. He provides a faithful rendering of Nietzschean philosophy. Of course, Nietzsche isn't everyone's cup of tea, and when his expositor fancies himself to be in the ubermensch category -- well, that's something a little different.

[gsjackson]

Pag's notion sounds a bit like scientology or Freudian psychology -- create some clerisy to get in there and root out viruses, instead of engrams or neuroses, or whatever else the clerisy is trained to see. May be promising, but personally I can't afford clerisies, and tend not to trust them, so I'll just have to solve my own problems.

[droid]

Why are gay people usually very bright? Keynes provided the foundation for modern economics

LMAO.

How's your AGI coming little guy?

http://www.travelwhiz.org/images/AGI2.png

Do you actually have something to say regarding your stupid praise for Keynesian economics? no? I thought so.

As far as AGI goes:
Unlike you untermensch, I'm actually working on it, instead of hiding behind general abstraction babble to pretend having some understanding lol.
You're just another fool that thinks you need 3TB of memory, 48TB of storag, 10GB switches, for AGI, what a retard. The more you write the more pathetic you look.

This world has no idea what the hardware can do with the right knowledge models

The fact is, you like many other fools don't know how those should be actually structured or how the inference and logic engines should manipulate them. Yet you pretend, by talking about generalities

10Thz, 48TB, 384TB per nano-cluster

LMAO what nonsense
You also can't even recognize that the system should be human verifiable, at least for a long time before it is allowed to self modulate. Have fun with that clusterf*k, that is, if you actually build something. Or maybe you can let one of your "subordinates" untangle it