I wouldn't be so sure about this. There is never a reason to make an extensive inquiry into the nature of another man's masculinity or sexuality if he isn't going to marry your daughter.droid wrote:Because he is the one repeatedly going out of his way to 'clarify' that for some reason he can't have an opinion on the matter. At least Yohan was a tad more honest and said he doesn't comment because he is straight.Adama wrote:I have another take on this matter though. Who cares about what MrMan sees or what he thinks he sees, or what he claims he sees? He only wants an opinion and gave his own opinion.droid wrote:
Who cares if he is unable or unwilling to judge another man's looks?
You guys might pretend otherwise but everyone here can see thru the backhanded discourse.
I agree it went out of proportion, it became interesting on its own lol. But It's not even about sexuality, it's just that it's kind of dialog-disrupting, so it stuck out enough for people to take notice.
I also agree accusing someone of being homo for criticizing homosexuality is a common liberal bullshit/shaming technique, 100%.
But in this case you guys are flipping it and doing it too. So we are homos because we say someone might be homo or conservative. Everyone here accusing each other of being homo lol.
Whatever MrMan thinks or doesn't think, it doesn't affect you or RF one bit. No one has the right to demand evidence and testimony from him as proof of his heterosexuality which is just nonsense and garbage. It's pretty outrageous to even think a person has the right to demand evidence from someone on anything from their own life.
Actually whether or not you or RF are homosexuals doesn't interest me, but just using logic, who is it who wants to shame heterosexual men for being heterosexual if not a homosexual or a lover of homosexuals? To the point where some people think they can demand testimony from the man.
And I bet if someone demanded testimony of heterosexuality in real life from someone, you'd both flip out, as a violation of the homosexual person's human rights. It would be seen as complete bigotry, if the three of you knew each other in person and saw each other daily.