Best interview on the fake moon landing

[NPCslammer]

Youtube always takes this one down, so watch it before it gets removed again. Billy Kaysing was a verified senior technical writer for Rocketdyne, which worked on the Apollo missions. Probably the best interviews out there exposing the fake moon landing.

https://youtu.be/4qIdfsOoDrU

[TruthSeeker]

He makes some very good points like the micrometeorites that would be raining down on the lunar surface. We experience those here on Earth but they are mostly burned up by the atmosphere.

[NPCslammer]

He makes some very good points like the micrometeorites that would be raining down on the lunar surface. We experience those here on Earth but they are mostly burned up by the atmosphere.

These are short clips and definitely worth watching. Look at the demeanor of the astroNOTS being questioned by the press. They look ashamed and guilty. The comments on the video are worth reading.

https://youtu.be/Xd1yBWsLsyQ

Great video by Eric Dubay on what pos the lunar module is. Brings up solid points.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDbUgd3MWSI

[Winston]

Have any of you ever listened to Bart Sibrel? He's the guy that Buzz Aldrin punched which made him infamous. Sibrel is probably the best speaker on the subject. He is very articulate and passionate and makes many good points about the fake moon landing. If you search his name on YouTube you will find many good interviews he did. He is very well spoken and easy to understand. However, he is a Christian fundamentalist who thumps the BIble too, that part of him I don't like. But his points about Apollo are very good and excellent.

Jarrah White at www.moonfaker.com is also very knowledgeable on the subject, but his voice is very dry and monotone. He's not as interesting as Sibrel, but he is good in a lot of technical information. Probably he's an aspie too, so he's very logical and literal and to the point.

[Winston]

He makes some very good points like the micrometeorites that would be raining down on the lunar surface. We experience those here on Earth but they are mostly burned up by the atmosphere.

Except however, when you look at the moon through a telescope you will never see anything hit it. Ever. Even if you look at the moon for 100 years, it's always the same. Nothing ever hits it or touches it or causes dust to shoot up from it. This means that the moon may not be a solid object or rock. And that the famous phrase "the moon is made of swiss cheese" could have some truth to it, and that's why the phrase has been around for ages even though on the surface it sounds like a silly phrase that is pointless. Usually nursery rhymes that contain truth drops become eternal even though they sound silly and meaningless, when that happens it means there is some truth drop in it that the system has to let you know as part of the "mind games" they play on us. They have to tell us the truth and lie to us at the same time, it's part of their weird occult ritual that they cast over us.

Another thing. The craters you do see on the moon don't make sense. Because if meterors hit the moon before, they would not always come down in a straight perpendicular line. Some of them should crash and roll and create skid marks. But you never see any skid marks on the moon. This doesn't make sense and means the craters could be caused by something else, or they could be an illusion.

Even the meteror craters on Earth like the big one in Arizona, have never been proven to be caused by rocks from space. They could be sinkholes caused by geysers or something under the Earth. After all, if a rock caused that crater, there should be traces of the rock left, but there aren't. A rock can't just vaporize or disintegrate. You could say the same about the four large planes that vaporized on 9/11 too, which is impossible and never been explained.

All we can say is that reality is not what they tell us.

[NPCslammer]

He makes some very good points like the micrometeorites that would be raining down on the lunar surface. We experience those here on Earth but they are mostly burned up by the atmosphere.

Except however, when you look at the moon through a telescope you will never see anything hit it. Ever. Even if you look at the moon for 100 years, it's always the same. Nothing ever hits it or touches it or causes dust to shoot up from it. This means that the moon may not be a solid object or rock. And that the famous phrase "the moon is made of swiss cheese" could have some truth to it, and that's why the phrase has been around for ages even though on the surface it sounds like a silly phrase that is pointless. Usually nursery rhymes that contain truth drops become eternal even though they sound silly and meaningless, when that happens it means there is some truth drop in it that the system has to let you know as part of the "mind games" they play on us. They have to tell us the truth and lie to us at the same time, it's part of their weird occult ritual that they cast over us.

Another thing. The craters you do see on the moon don't make sense. Because if meterors hit the moon before, they would not always come down in a straight perpendicular line. Some of them should crash and roll and create skid marks. But you never see any skid marks on the moon. This doesn't make sense and means the craters could be caused by something else, or they could be an illusion.

Even the meteror craters on Earth like the big one in Arizona, have never been proven to be caused by rocks from space. They could be sinkholes caused by geysers or something under the Earth. After all, if a rock caused that crater, there should be traces of the rock left, but there aren't. A rock can't just vaporize or disintegrate. You could say the same about the four large planes that vaporized on 9/11 too, which is impossible and never been explained.

All we can say is that reality is not what they tell us.

Yes, but Bill Kaysing is not coming from the flat earth perspective. He’s simply coming from the perspective that the moon landing was an impossibility. I believe it was Bart Sibrel who conducted the interview, who also doesn’t really go for the flat earth theory. I disagree with that, but he’s still an expert on debunking the laughable Apollo missions.

[Gali]

He makes some very good points like the micrometeorites that would be raining down on the lunar surface. We experience those here on Earth but they are mostly burned up by the atmosphere.

Except however, when you look at the moon through a telescope you will never see anything hit it. Ever. Even if you look at the moon for 100 years, it's always the same. Nothing ever hits it or touches it or causes dust to shoot up from it. This means that the moon may not be a solid object or rock. And that the famous phrase "the moon is made of swiss cheese" could have some truth to it, and that's why the phrase has been around for ages even though on the surface it sounds like a silly phrase that is pointless. Usually nursery rhymes that contain truth drops become eternal even though they sound silly and meaningless, when that happens it means there is some truth drop in it that the system has to let you know as part of the "mind games" they play on us. They have to tell us the truth and lie to us at the same time, it's part of their weird occult ritual that they cast over us.

Another thing. The craters you do see on the moon don't make sense. Because if meterors hit the moon before, they would not always come down in a straight perpendicular line. Some of them should crash and roll and create skid marks. But you never see any skid marks on the moon. This doesn't make sense and means the craters could be caused by something else, or they could be an illusion.

Even the meteror craters on Earth like the big one in Arizona, have never been proven to be caused by rocks from space. They could be sinkholes caused by geysers or something under the Earth. After all, if a rock caused that crater, there should be traces of the rock left, but there aren't. A rock can't just vaporize or disintegrate. You could say the same about the four large planes that vaporized on 9/11 too, which is impossible and never been explained.

All we can say is that reality is not what they tell us.

All we can say is that reality is not what they tell us.

In that case maybe you are a illusion. So we live in a simulation why even care to talk about flat earth when the earth, trees, rocks do not exist?

Wow I am intelligent I proved everything is a illusion. Why are you such NPCs and why I am so intelligent and you are so dumb. Because of frequency and dimensions.

[Winston]

Yes Gali. Reality could be an illusion. But consciousness is definitely REAL. You dumb atheists cannot explain that, so you have to say that consciousness is an illusion and a by product of the brain, but you have no explanation for it at all because it doesn't fit int your materialistic "everything is an accident and due to random chance" theory which is totally ridiculous and dumber than dumb and not even a child would buy it. So stupid.

Remember that atoms are 99.9999999 percent empty space. That right there proves the illusion and simulation or dream. It could be that this reality is a hybrid of things, both a simulation and a dream. The matrix is generated from the 4D realm. The problem is that most people assume a simulation is 3D or 2D like the simulation on your PC. This reality is obviously not like that. It's a 4D simulation, that's what people don't get. It's generated from outside time and space, and that's why it feels so real.