Voyager1 wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbQQBzXAQ1Q[/youtube]
Filled with errors!
For a clear view, go here: clear pics and intelligent discussion.
https://www.metabunk.org/views-of-toron ... ure.t8149/
Voyager1 wrote:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbQQBzXAQ1Q[/youtube]
Nice to see you really have some common sense.Winston wrote:Voyager1 wrote:Winston, you lack understanding. During the time of "sunset" the sun is getting less and less bright. That's because it's getting further away from our vantage point. The light of the sun also is travelling horizontally through a gas (the atmosphere) to reach us. Eventually it gets far enough away we no longer see it's light and it becomes "night" where we are. The sun is closest to us at mid day where it is hottest and brightest and it's rays are travelling vertically towards us. Make sense?Winston wrote:On a flat surface, if you can see a light from half of the surface, then you can from the other half too. There's no way around this. It doesn't matter how far away the Sun is, whether it's 300 miles away or 93 million. What this means is that if the Sun is visible during the daytime - and we all know how bright the Sun is - then it MUST, ABSOLUTELY MUST, be visible at nighttime too. There's no way around this. Even if for some odd reason the Sun was not visible to the naked eye at night, then it would have to be visible from a telescope at least, if the Earth were flat.That doesn't explain anything. The Sun is a VERY bright object. If you don't believe it then try staring at it in the daytime and see how long you can gaze at it. Enough said.Adama wrote:Winston has apparently never heard of the artist's perspective. A simple search will reveal how the sun disappears via perspective, not because of the roundness of the earth.
If at night the Sun is too far away to see, then how can you see the stars at night? The stars are thousands of times LESS bright than the Sun. If you can see the stars, and the Sun is on the other side of a flat earth surface, then WHY can't you see the Sun at all? That's the big question here that you can't get around. There's no way around this. You guys cannot possibly explain this away. It's a lost cause. So you might as well give it up. Think about it.
Again, get a flat dish plate out and a ball out, as I described above, and play with it and see what I mean. There is no way around this.
Like I stated, the groups of nearby stars are travelling in more or less the same direction, all orbiting the galaxy. The distances involved are enormous, yet as I've repeatedly referenced, there are proven parallax and even motion measurements, showing displacement throughout the year.Winston wrote:To Droid:
You still haven't answered one question. If Earth is moving at 67,000 mph around the Sun, and our solar system is moving at 500,000 mph around the galaxy, then how come the North Star, Polaris, is ALWAYS above the North Pole in the exact same place and never moves an inch? How can that be? I asked you many times. But you keep dodging this question. Why?
Trigonometry explains this Winston. When a surface is facing a light upfront it gets 100% of the energy on its area. If you tilt it you get a reduced amount of photons per unit area, proportional to the cosine of the angle.Winston wrote: Also, can you explain why, if the Earth is 93 million miles away, then how come a slight tilt forward or backward makes a huge difference in temperature, such as the difference between Winter and Summer? At 93 million miles away, a tilt should make no difference right?
Why didnt you answer the serious question? Do you ever wonder about it?droid wrote:^They're giant luminescent unicellular organisms splattered on the "dome". They're 1000 feet across each, but only 5000 miles or so away.
So parallax is explained because they move when the scientists attempt to do the measurements, it's all a giant joke they're playing.
Their claim is that such flights are a hoax and dont exist. Or they do exist but that they take long detours and make refueling stops so they arent really direct flights.gsjackson wrote:Just curious if any FEers have an answer to the question: What about the Qantas direct flight between Sydney and Santiago, Chile? It takes about 12.5 to 14.5 hours, depending on the direction. According to the flat earth map you usually see, these locales are just too far apart to be connected by a direct flight because the airliners can't carry enough fuel to go 17K miles.
The only answer I've seen from FE people is that this flat earth map was put forward by the globalists, and flat earthers have not settled on their own version of a map of the world, so maybe these locations are much closer than appear on the FE map we usually see. Anyone know any other responses to this argument?
Winston wrote:Their claim is that such flights are a hoax and dont exist. Or they do exist but that they take long detours and make refueling stops so they arent really direct flights.gsjackson wrote:Just curious if any FEers have an answer to the question: What about the Qantas direct flight between Sydney and Santiago, Chile? It takes about 12.5 to 14.5 hours, depending on the direction. According to the flat earth map you usually see, these locales are just too far apart to be connected by a direct flight because the airliners can't carry enough fuel to go 17K miles.
The only answer I've seen from FE people is that this flat earth map was put forward by the globalists, and flat earthers have not settled on their own version of a map of the world, so maybe these locations are much closer than appear on the FE map we usually see. Anyone know any other responses to this argument?
See videos by Mark Sargent on YouTube. He has videos about southern flights and is a flat earther.
However, El_caudillo is from New Zealand and he told me that be has flown such a route and indeed it was about 14 hours, and that this is common knowledge in NZ. So many NZers have flown it. Thus only Americans are fooled by the flat earth map. Americans such as Adama. Lol. No offense Adama. Lol.
No, the prevailing view in the movement seems to be that the FE map currently used is distorted, and that the locations are not that far apart when taking the most direct route not too great a distance off the shores of North and South America.Winston wrote:Their claim is that such flights are a hoax and dont exist. Or they do exist but that they take long detours and make refueling stops so they arent really direct flights.gsjackson wrote:Just curious if any FEers have an answer to the question: What about the Qantas direct flight between Sydney and Santiago, Chile? It takes about 12.5 to 14.5 hours, depending on the direction. According to the flat earth map you usually see, these locales are just too far apart to be connected by a direct flight because the airliners can't carry enough fuel to go 17K miles.
The only answer I've seen from FE people is that this flat earth map was put forward by the globalists, and flat earthers have not settled on their own version of a map of the world, so maybe these locations are much closer than appear on the FE map we usually see. Anyone know any other responses to this argument?
See videos by Mark Sargent on YouTube. He has videos about southern flights and is a flat earther.
However, El_caudillo is from New Zealand and he told me that be has flown such a route and indeed it was about 14 hours, and that this is common knowledge in NZ. So many NZers have flown it. Thus only Americans are fooled by the flat earth map. Americans such as Adama. Lol. No offense Adama. Lol.
The point of this deception is to turn reality upside down. They want you to believe in the opposite of reality. This is called beguiling unstable souls. We already know the stars are right above our heads inside the firmament of heaven. We know the sun and the moon are inside the firmament.Winston wrote:Heres a disturbing question for you all:
What if the sun and moon are flat discs and not balls or spheres? And there is a dome above us? And the stars are just points of lights or plasma balls and not far away suns? Lol. Suppose all that turned out to be true. Wouldnt that totally f**k up your view of reality, the universe and life itself? Lol. Wouldnt it traumatize you? Lol. It sure would to me.
If you think about it, you never see the moon rotate like a spinning ball. So you cant be sure its sphere shaped. You never see its back side. But it does rotate like a wheel it seems, according to images Ive seen. And some have even detected a period blip running across the moon too, which has been shown on YouTube. So perhaps the moon is a video projection? I dont know. But its interesting to ponder and wonder about, because if true, it will totally f**k up our view of reality completely. Lol
Do you ever dare to wonder or think about this stuff? Lol. Or does it make you uncomfortable so you avoid it or dismiss it with no second thought? Lol.