I am not on an ego trip.LinuxOnly wrote:assume, thats all you do. when did the debate end or begin? i thought i was talking to a brick wall. notice you've never addressed any of my concerns either, you've only marginalized me as a "conspiracy theorist", repeatedly insulted my intelligence, and reminded me that you'd be dead if it wasn't for the polio vaccine. fine, i've lost the debate, does make your viewpoint any less ridiculous, any less worthless!? does it change lies to fact?globetrotter wrote:Not one sound rebuttal, not one.LinuxOnly wrote:globetrotter is one useful idiot.
Your only reply is some cool, l33t internet meme graphic?
You have lost the debate, yet you don't know it.
i'm after the truth, lets call it reality, you're on some ego trip after an invisible prize for internet arguments. you're only hurting yourself in the long run by believing the pile of manure that 9/11 was the work of an islamic conspiracy and injecting yourself with mercury is better than getting the flu.
the reason i used "emotion" as you called it, was because the only way to cure brainwash is for the person to see it themselves. i pointed out coincidences which you should find peculiar and further investigate. instead you brush them aside and call them "emotional".
why they can't give us any footage of a plane hitting the pentagon. it's one of the most guarded buildings in the usa and has many security cameras around it. are we supposed to believe a mcdonalds has better and more security cameras than the pentagon?
there's nothing emotional about a 47 story building suddenly collapsing causing you to think maybe there's something wrong here.
or about observing that the hijacker recorded over the radio system had an israeli accent. (and wondering who the attacks benefit)
or comparing various airline crashes you've seen with the one in pennsylvania which miraculously had less wreckage and bodies than a motorcycle accident.
no you can't just put up some equations to bluff your way out and say we simply don't know enough science. if this is a question of science it is in the realm of human manipulation. this is about an error in the process of your thought. there is something very emotional about believing you are smarter than everyone else and that you are never wrong. were you ever wrong? then what makes you so certain you aren't right now? that's basic introspection on the path to truth.
I addressed your points, and I defeated your argument, but you lack the ability to recognize when this has happened.
You would only think so if you were ignorant of science, physics and building materials science.there's nothing emotional about a 47 story building suddenly collapsing causing you to think maybe there's something wrong here.
When you toss a few hundred tons of debris on to a building from 53 storeys above, it might cause it to experience structural failure, don't you agree?
Shall I calculate the KE involved and compare it to a bomb blast?
This is your belief system, it is not fact.if this is a question of science it is in the realm of human manipulation.
g is a known constant. So is c. So is .5mv^2. Your belief that they are alterable simply by human manipulation is a statement of deep ignorance.
Here are a few scientific facts not subject to the realm of human manipulation:
The KE of a 767 or 757, its passengers, crew, cargo and fuel at 500 mph.
The PE of the fuel contained within the 767's tanks.
The specific heat capacity of steel and aluminum.
The above formula and constants have been verified over and over and over again in labs. They are widely know to several significant digits.