Join John Adams, world renowned Intl Matchmaker, Thurs nights 8:30 EST for Live Webcasts with FREE Prizes!
And check out Five Reasons why you should attend a FREE Live AFA Seminar! See locations and details.


Scam free! Check out Christian Filipina - Meet Asian women with Christian values! Members screened.
Exclusive book offer! 75% off! How to Meet, Date and Marry Your Filipina Wife



View Active Topics       Latest 100 Topics       View Your Posts       FAQ Topics       Switch to Mobile


Does education destroy femininity in women?

Discuss dating, relationships and foreign women.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Does education destroy femininity in women?

Postby Winston » Sun Mar 03, 2013 9:34 pm

Here Roosh observes that education definitely makes a woman less feminine and more masculine in both personality and appearance. Is that true? If so, does this mean that it's better for a woman not to be educated? If so, to what degree? How come education hasn't made Russian women less feminine?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4Apdtq5Zwk[/youtube]
Check out the latest posts in our blog The Happier Abroaders.

Don't forget my HA Grand Ebook and Dating Sites!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne, How I Found Freedom in an Unfree World
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
 
Posts: 23610
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:16 pm







Postby Andrewww » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:26 pm

Nope, there are many models (or escorts) out there with university degrees. In EE, as you mentioned, a lot of women get educated since university is mostly free (if you have good grades in high school that is).

As I said on other topics, I believe it boils down to how well the parents manage to instill some values in their children. No one else can do that better than your mother or father.

What's happening to you Winston, you became a Roosh follower now ?
Andrewww
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 4:51 am

Postby zacb » Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:52 pm

While I think he may be overrating a tad, I think he hit the nail on the head. When a woman has excess male attention who isn't even the most attractive, there is a slight problem. Should there be a partner for everyone? Yes. But there is an underlying problem. But I think the way he handled it was not the most optimal. There are probably better ways of saying a girl is ugly.
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
zacb
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1510
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:33 am
Location: Michigan

Winston you already know...

Postby buddy77 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:05 pm

That it is feminism, that ironically makes women less feminine (the name is reverse psychology/nlp in effect).

However, if they take
"women's studies", or
"gender studies" course in college, they will be less feminine and i I know they teach misandry diguised as (women's rights) in those classes.

Too bad guy ever took (the schools) to court for teaching sexism and misandry! We men cannot change american society, but we should start fighting women in courts with law suits when ever misandry, sexism and double standards are used against men.

We should legally sue feminists and hurt them financially, just as they've been doing to men for decades now.
buddy77
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:23 pm
Location: California

Re: Winston you already know...

Postby zacb » Mon Mar 04, 2013 4:09 pm

buddy77 wrote:That it is feminism, that ironically makes women less feminine (the name is reverse psychology/nlp in effect).

However, if they take
"women's studies", or
"gender studies" course in college, they will be less feminine and i I know they teach misandry diguised as (women's rights) in those classes.

Too bad guy ever took (the schools) to court for teaching sexism and misandry! We men cannot change american society, but we should start fighting women in courts with law suits when ever misandry, sexism and double standards are used against men.

We should legally sue feminists and hurt them financially, just as they've been doing to men for decades now.


True. Especially "sexual harassment"
The Daily Agorist, Learn to Live Independent of the System! http://www.theagoristreview.blogspot.com
zacb
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1510
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 3:33 am
Location: Michigan

Postby Tsar » Tue Mar 05, 2013 3:19 am

In some cases I believe that education does make a women less feminine but I think it has a lot to do with other factors. If you think about a woman who goes to college, she must spent more years of her youth studying. Many girls sleep around and become whores at Western colleges. Then they go on to work. If a woman is working as a doctor or lawyer then how can she have time for a man? She would be a workaholic careerist woman. Nothing against women entering those fields that but I personally do not want a woman like that.

Education is not a problem. Many upper-class and noblewomen throughout history were educated. The topics they could pursue was restricted and they did not go around becoming harlots. Throughout history, the harlots were shunned and the only job for a harlot was working in a brothel. Today women can pursue any education and they can openly act as harlots, the harlots are congratulated and given good jobs and many men go running to take the harlot as his wife. The education could be one piece of the puzzle in some cases, but the harlotry that goes on throughout a woman's time in high school and university, and the feminist propaganda are what makes a woman less feminine.

Some careers that women are traditionally suited for that does not reduce femininity: singing, dancing, floral arrangements, decorating, baking, something with children, something nurturing, modeling, helping her man with his career, and most importantly doing things for her husband. If the family was rich, the women would only be required to be beautiful and take up a hobby and be a good wife, and a good mother to any children.

In any case, I would prefer any girls I am involved with in the future to have a high school degree, not careerist (maybe no job), and not planning on going for a higher education. She can pursue something nurturing or educate herself through reading.
Tsar
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1826
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:40 pm

Postby Robert77 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:34 pm

there seems to be a correlation with education and lack of happiness....

apparently with women the more independent, educated and successful they are, the less happy they tend to be
World traveler, questions about women from a certain country? Ask!!! I can help
Robert77
Freshman Poster
 
Posts: 354
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:34 am

Re: Winston you already know...

Postby abcdavid01 » Tue Mar 05, 2013 6:07 pm

buddy77 wrote:Too bad guy ever took (the schools) to court for teaching sexism and misandry! We men cannot change american society, but we should start fighting women in courts with law suits when ever misandry, sexism and double standards are used against men.

We should legally sue feminists and hurt them financially, just as they've been doing to men for decades now.


No, that would be adopting women's methods to use against them. Instead we should only use masculine methods. Either violent revolution or opting out of the system. This site is about the second, though I could absolutely see the first occurring in my lifetime.

"With respect to the distribution of your time, the following is what I should approve: From 8. to 10. o'clock practise music. From 10. to 1. dance one day and draw another. From 1. to 2. draw on the day you dance, and write a letter next day. From 3. to 4. read French. From 4. to 5. exercise yourself in music. From 5. till bedtime, read English, write, etc." - Thomas Jefferson in a letter to his daughter

The problem with women and education is the assumption of egalitarianism. Women are naturally irrational. They make decisions based on feeling. Even the smartest women are likely to just use logic and rationalism to justify their feelings. This is different from men, who are more likely to be passionate about logically constructed arguments. The starting point is less arbitrary for men.
中国人万岁! 中国美女万岁!
abcdavid01
Experienced Poster
 
Posts: 1580
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:52 am
Location: On the run

Postby djfourmoney » Tue Mar 05, 2013 7:22 pm

This is another case where men need to be more selective and start taking linguistic classes in College...

Using the word "Ugly" is going to draw ire from Feminist and their White Knight Protectors/Simps.

If you instead said "unattractive" I think that would have gone down a bit better but you still would have been attacked for basing your assumptions about this woman on physical appearance.

What Feminist want is to removed men's tendency to go with youngest, healthiest women available. Beauty has only recently been an issue in popular culture because men in power used it to grade potential employees.

When unqualified but attractive women were hired over more qualified but not as attractive women = Unfair but a human construct

So they went about changing the human construct. There is no going back, you're going to have to adjust to this. If you want to engage feminist you need to select your words carefully something MOST MEN ARE NOT USED TO DOING.

Which is why I don't engage them and they generally don't engage Black men anyway. Fear of a Black dick? I dunno...

As I said before Feminist don't fear White men....

As a side note, there isn't much of this happening in South America or Africa.

I don't fear educated women at all, my mother is one (Georgetown) and my sister (NYU)
djfourmoney
Elite Upper Class Poster
 
Posts: 3129
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 11:09 pm
Location: Los Angeles


Return to Dating, Relationships, Foreign Women

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests