Do a simple YouTube search for clips where you can hear it for yourself.flowerthief00 wrote: ↑July 10th, 2020, 11:54 pmSheesh people, even were it true that he is a racist or a white nationalist (I have listened to him a fair lot but somehow missed him say that) you say "good riddance" at your own loss.
Free speech, in the constitutional context doesn't mean that people can just spout off anything that tickles their fancy. I just means that GOVERNMENT (Federal, state, and local) cannot restrict speech arbitrarily unless there is some specific harm that is going to be the result (ie. yelling "fire" in a packed movie theater to watch the stampede afterward.) Political speech enjoys the highest measures of protection against government censor.flowerthief00 wrote: Free speech means nothing if the speech of those we disagree with isn't free.
However, private businesses and entities can indeed restrict free speech. So expecting YouTube, which has a feminist CEO and a cadre of SJW staff members, is woefully naive. Molyneux spewing his nonsense might be protected from government retribution, but the free market can silence him all they want. That is nothing new.
If he was really concerned about censor, he should have chosen a more hospitable platform. He wanted to have the biggest pool of viewers in the world so he has to pay the consequences.