yick wrote: ↑November 30th, 2023, 2:50 am
NPCslammer wrote: ↑November 30th, 2023, 2:27 am
“I don’t have to do anything.”
You’re right, but the reason you won’t is because it will proven that you are lying cunt. Naturally, a pos like you not going to willingly own himself. Don’t worry I never expected you would, cunt.
Noooooooooo - it's because it there for anyone to see who can be bothered. I don't have to do your bidding you f***ing sex pest.
This means what coming from a lying cunt?
It means it is a valid opinion, Thailand, Philippines and the US - your world, how sad.
“The mod put a stop to it.” No he didn’t. He just said take it to another thread. That’s must have been so massively difficult for you to do, lying cunt. More pathetic, laughable excuses.
He put a stop to it in the thread and I had no interest in taking it to another thread.
You’re still doubling down on your appeal to authority fallacy. Does their expertise hold weight?
Thank you, the rest of it is bullshit.
Sure. I will even agree that the courts as f***ed up as they are still probably get criminal cases right the majority of the time. But you’re claiming that because they are experts they almost always right, and if you question them you can’t be right because you’re not an expert. Again a fallacy
Nooooooooo - what I am saying is that the defence weren't able to come up with an expert to counter the prosecutions experts - and that is why Derek is sitting in a prison cell as a murderer. Experts can argue with other experts, what would be outrageous is YOU arguing with an expert and telling him he is wrong when you don't even have a dole and all you do is scav dole.
You know what the 3rd leading cause of death in the U.S. is? It’s doctors. Misdiagnosis, unnecessary surgery and side effects from drugs. 250,000 to 400,000 thousand estimated to die from medical “errors” every year. And you’re still acting like the medical experts in George Floyd case are still nearly infallible. It’s f***ing hilarious.
Right, so did the defence bring in medical experts to state why Chauvin didn't kill Floyd? Or did they say 'f**k it, we don't need medical experts, they kill 400000 Americans every year
'
NOT relevant.
Tell me I’m wrong about that, ignorant cunt. Also, I know you won’t answer it because you are a liar, but if your doctor prescribed you Vioxx you would have taken it because you are a gullible fool. You would probably be dead or maimed for life with debilitating side effects. Perhaps your appeal to authority stupidity isn’t so bad after all.
NOT relevant. You want a 'medical expert' to come and force a retrial so Del boy can get off his murder rap though, don't you? Fool!
What are you talking about it you ignorant cunt? Are you replying to the wrong thread? The massive scope of damage, mayhem, death threats injuries, murders, vandalism threat rioting is not a conspiracy theory.
It's theory, you don't know if it would have happened or not. It will have to remain theoretical, can you not just try and stick to the facts instead of being a strawmanning cunt taking this debate in all directions?
To say that the “justice” system doesn’t want to risk that again with a retrial and possible not guilty verdict of Chauvin is not some outlandish assumption. Riots AFTER the rittenhouse verdict happened. Deaths threats and an attempted assassination attempt of Judge Kavanaugh happened. To act like judges, jury members, Supreme court justices and lawyers would not take the possibility of future riots into consideration is you just being a moronic, disingenuous cunt.
In the US, verdicts don't get handed down based on what public opinion might be. Public unrest isn't uncommon in the states, happens all the time, the authorities are ready for it - maybe Chauvin went down because the evidence was there to convict him, again, Minnesota law states Chauvin had to have a hand in Floyd's death to get convicted, the burden of proof is low, now if he lived in Texas or Florida, he might have got off with it, but he didn't - he lived in Minnesota and was tried under their state law and he got sent down.
“I didn’t I said that until until a retrial happens that proves Chauvin didn’t kill Floyd you need to shut the f**k up.”
Nah, I don’t have to.
True, but your whinging and whining won't matter one iota, go and write him a letter, become his penpal and get over it, he might send you a nude pic of him weighing 140 pounds
Not relevant.
According to you’re not allowed to say anything that contradicts this verdict, question it or say that he was innocent. Despite the fact that he was innocent for 3 decades in prison. Despite the fact that your fellow leftists cunts have have conniptions and riot over verdicts they don’t like all the time and question guilty or not guilty verdicts all the time. But I’m not allowed to because a whiny little bitch in China says SHUT THE f**k up in all caps.
How about shut your own ass up bitch. And crawl back into the hobo sewer pipe you live in.
I didn't - what I said was that until otherwise, Derek Chauvin is a convicted murderer and you throwing toys out of the pram doesn't mean jack shit - not a f***ing thing - and until real evidence that can force a retrial can be found then you must have better things to do than to whinge and cry about this murderer sat in a prison cell today.
Have you thought about getting a job? Earn an honest living?
“No it’s because it’s there to see for anyone who can be bothered”
No, it’s because you are lying cunt.
“Thank you the rest is bullshit.”
Your appeal to authority fallacy was indeed bullshit.
“It means it’s a valid opinion.”
Why should anyone care about the opinion of a lying bitch in China?
“What would be outrageous is you arguing with an expert and claiming he’s wrong.”
“Right so did the defense bring in medical experts to prove that chauvin killed Floyd or did they say f**k it we don’t need them the kill 400,000 thousand every year”.
You think that if some of those 400,000 questioned the “experts” a little bit more they wouldn’t still be alive ya braindead cunt? Ya think the same line of reasoning might just apply to the experts in Chauvin’s case? After all, new evidence came out showing that perhaps the previous experts in court just might be wrong. It might be really hard for a lying pea brained cunt like you to understand but maybe you can do it. According to you those 400,000 never should have questioned the experts that killed them because those patients weren’t experts. You are a f***ing idiot.
So five years back if I was saying that Round Up was dangerous and arguing with an environmental scientist who was part of the approval process, according to you he’d still be correct and that it’s perfectly safe despite being a proven carcinogen as of now that gave people non Hodgkin Lymphoma.
You are an idiotic cunt. But feel free to put your money where your mouth is and take some formerly approved FDA drugs and see how that works out for you braindead cunt. Again, an “Appeal to Authority” fallacy.
“NOT relevant”.
It’s totally relevant. You said trust the medical experts, but in the case of Vioxx and other formerly approved drugs you won’t admit that you would ingest them like a gullible cunt or that you don’t actually trust them and you wouldn’t take it. You can’t put your money where your mouth is because you are a lying cunt, and makes your “trust the experts” argument utter bullshit, like what’s between your ears.
“It’s theory” “ Can you stop being a strawmanning cunt?”:lol:
You obviously have no idea what a strawman argument is ya dumb cunt. And it is theory, but it’s highly plausible that it would happen. The government isn’t gonna go, “Well if we put heavy sanctions on this country is merely a theory that they will retaliate military or economically so there’s no need to take that into consideration. That would be utterly moronic, just like you ya braindead cunt.
“In the U.S. verdicts don’t get handed down on what public opinion might be.”
That’s is an incredibly stupid claim that is laughable in every sense. Studies have shown that judges even change their bias on having lunch or not. And you think death threats or the possibility of nationwide riots would have zero effect. You are a f***ing moron.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sc ... -of-judges
“Now all if he lived in Texas Florida or Florida he might have gotten off.”
You’re admitting that if it was a different state Chauvin could be an innocent man. Yet you’re here acting like it’s outlandish to question the verdict. Thanks for owning yourself ya dumb cunt.
“Not relevant”.
It’s 100% relevant. According to you he was guilty before he was exonerated, yet he was innocent. And anybody should stfu about it until the courts figure it out THREE f***ing decades later. Again, you are a braindead cunt.
“True but your whinging and whining won’t matter”
This coming from the guy that gets more angry and butthurt than a 5 year old on a time out when someone says “dindu” and “muzzie”.
And you make the mistake of thinking I care enough about this to organize some protest for this guy. With the absolute shitload of crimes and human trafficking etc.. there are much bigger fish to fry. It’s satisfying enough making you look like a dumb bitch.