What happened to the Indians was tragic, but it was not some deliberate genocide. They fought a sporadic, intermittent race war, and they generally lost.Winston wrote:Jester,
I don't understand your argument. How can the Indians not be the good guys? The Americans STOLE their lands and drove them off. What do you expect them to do?
Clearly the Indians were the victims and were wiped out and done wrong to. How can you debate that?
Also, how did the Native American holocaust happen exactly? I mean, I can't imagine armies of God fearing white Christians lining up millions of Indians to shoot and exterminate like Nazis. There were no Indian concentration camps. So how were millions wiped out exactly?
Could the Native American holocaust also be an exaggerated hoax?
Their policy of kidnapping women and children, sometimes toruring them and killing them, was a real bad strategy. Also their habits of bushwhacking and stealing, even when there was a truce. White Americans were both moral, and moralistic (Calvinist etc) with little patience for thievery etc.
Their numbers declined for a while, but they are still around. They were not "killed off". Numbers decline when a race or civilization goes into despair and depression. Look at us now, for example, and all the White countries, plus Japan.
There were only like 2 million Indians in all the 48 states when Whites arrived. They were not numerous like in Mexico or Peru. Why? Because they were uncivilized, backward savages. They lived without agriculture or technology. Or mercy. They fought merciless wars of ethnic cleansing among each other, as late as the late 1700's in the Midwest.
What about the Spaniards, were they less savage or cruel than Anglo Whites. Hell no. Spaniards had learned severity from both Romans and Moors. They were severe.
What the Spaniards did BETTER was conversion. The Catholic church was FAR more successful than Protestants in converting Indians to Christianity, preventing them from becoming a pestilential nuisance.
In the North, Indians that converted successfully and learned to live in peace with their (better-armed) neighbors were able to stay in place in some cases, without deportation. Large numbers exist in North Carolina today, for example. And lots of Indians intermarried. There are a LOT of Southerners, for example, both White and Black, who proudly brag about Indian blood.
Re stealing land, see my comments above. They never OWNED much land. They generally lived nomadically, using huge areas for hunting grounds, viewing other humans (including other Indians) as competitors. If we all lived that way, the human race would be pretty tiny. And very backward.
Nowadays the PTB do their best to tell half-truths, to shame the Whites, and give others a chip on their shoulder. Both effects are intended as control mechanisms.
If I have not-so-White kids in the future (quite possible), I'll teach them to be proud of their ancestors, yes. I will also tell them that technology, art, music, civilization, etc. are the common heritage of mankind. God, not man, created the laws of physics and metaphysics. Newton, Einstein et al. didn't "invent" laws of physics, they just discovered them first. Whites and Jews don't OWN physics. Franklin discovered electricity, but that doesn't mean that Quakers now OWN electricity, or that others can't make discoveries. Maybe Franklin was descended from barbaric Anglo-Saxon marauders, who smelled foul and never bathed. So? Do you sit around lamenting the fact that some of your ancestors were uncivilized - or do you DO something about it?
Celebrate virtue and accomplishment where you find them. And go and do likewise.