Do you have a reading comprehension problem?Cornfed wrote: ↑August 27th, 2018, 11:53 pmBut aren’t there merits to probabilistic opinions? If commenting on someone’s plan to pay his debts by winning the lottery in the next month or Homer Simpson’s plan to pass an exam by hiding under a pile of coats and hoping everything turned out alright, wouldn’t it be valid to say that those were stupid ideas, even though there is some remote possibility that they might actually work.
1. PD was NOT stating a probability opinion. He claimed to be stating an objective fact remember? Can any man state his opinion about another man's future or x chance in x country as an objective fact? Why are you contesting this? Especially since there's a lot of evidence to the contrary?
2. Winston getting dates in Europe is not like winning the lottery. If a man won the lottery hundreds of times, like Winston got hundreds of dates in several countries, then of course it should be easy and highly likely. So if Winston has a track record of getting hundreds of dates and is good at it, which is easily verifiable, then definitely it's a HIGH probability, not like the low odds of winning a lottery.
Do you understand? I just wasted my time explaining something you should ALREADY know. Sheesh.
I explained this to you before. Are you stupid or dishonest? Which one?
Do you not know the difference between "objective fact" and "probable"?
Why do you give one random man's pure SPECULATION more credibility and authority, than the proven track record of Winston Wu, which is verifiable in thousands of photos and 38 hours of video and can be vouched for by eyewitness testimonies such as Rock and others? That's insane. There's NO COMPARISON at all! DUH!
Why are you taking his side when you CLEARLY know he's in the wrong? Don't you have any basic moral values? Don't you care about right and wrong?!
Btw did you read the 3 lessons above? Do you agree with them? Why or why not?