MarcosZeitola wrote:Let's assume for a moment you are right, Cornfed. Assuming women go for men who are wortlless scum, what does this say about the women? You treat them as if they are essentially children, who have to be guided in everything and can't make up their mind. That the minute they see a dominant, immoral man, they get weak to their knees and the moment they see him take drugs or stab someone, they'll spread their legs...
To me this is preposterous and not exactly agrees with my own observation. But assuming it is true, then these women are worthless. Any woman who would pick a criminal over a genuinely good fellow, is worthless anyway. Who is to say she won't go back to some criminal lover the second you head off to work? Who is to say she won't have his kids and you will unknowingly raise them? If your theory is true, then 95% of women are complete and utter scum themselves.
And if 95% of women are complete and utter scum, what is even the point in trying? The type of beliefs you walk around with, Cornfed, would make a lesser man suicidal. Your level of 'red pill' is lethal.
I think the outspoken women in the past treated me very badly. That is, the quiet women were in the background and they mostly go unnoticed, because they are reserved. Whereas the real witches in life come to the forefront, because they are loud and stick out like a sore thumb. When I thought of women, I never thought of these quiet women. I always thought of the women who were attempting to hurt me because they are beasts.
There are also some bimbos who do not see other people are truly human beings because they aren't very bright. They're stuck so deep in their own arrogance that they can not see that other people have feelings too. These may be the people labeled with personality disorders (which just means they are extremely selfish individuals who do not see others as persons but as objects and pawns). These women will hurt people intentionally and unintentionally because they are unable to empathize with others. The moment something goes wrong, even if it is their fault, they can weave a lie even to themselves and believe it, which absolves them of responsibility and puts it all upon the man. This is what I mean by a bimbo.
The solution is the find a woman who is willing to please. That way you know she is submissive and you know that she views you as a true human being, instead of one who is just her pawn to be used and abused. In other words, make the woman work for you, which is the way they were designed. The moment the man starts to cater to a woman it is over, because that gives the woman power to abuse him.
So I used to think that all women were evil too, but that was my emotions blocking me from seeing reality. I was operating under a false belief system (that women are better than men socially, socially more intelligent, never afraid of men, and all the other beliefs our mangina friends will tell us when we ask for advice). When you operate under a false belief system, all the evidence you gather will conform to the theory you've already chosen. You won't be able to see conflicting evidence, or it will be dismissed as an anomaly.
That's why universal assumptions and opinions are destructive. The men who think all women are evil believe that they are protecting themselves from women. They are really just forcing themselves into isolation. If no woman anywhere is good, then what is the point of even thinking about women? Might as well just become a monk, or go live in a log cabin in the woods of Alaska. That would be more productive than thinking about women when they are purely entirely evil to the last woman on earth.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
It just could not be another variable for him. Success = genetically superior. He even went on to say how they will have more children, which proves they are genetically superior even more. But to me it just looked like another circular argument.