momopi wrote:Rock wrote: Do you have a reading problem? This isn't about me. On October 3, 2008, years before I joined this forum, you wrote:That advice is very simple and straightforward no matter what the context!!! Nothing to do with emergencies man. Come on and own up.momopi wrote:Don't chase tail ends. BUY LOW SELL HIGH.
GOLD AND SILVER ARE OVER-PRICED AND YOU SHOULD WAIT UNTIL THEY DROP BEFORE BUYING. Keep a small % of your assets in precious metals (1-2%?) but not everything.
No, you're the one who ignored this part from this very thread:
momopi wrote: I tell people to hold a small % of their assets in gold, but I dislike telling folks to sell, because if the purpose is to hold for emergencies, then selling may defeat the purpose. At one time I may have thought "buy low sell high". Now I think "buy low and hold" on gold.
And this earlier post, addressed to you:
viewtopic.php?p=105910&highlight=gold+e ... ies#105910
momopi wrote: 1. I hold gold as a rabbit hole and thus I do not sell outside of emergencies.
<snip>
I advocate holding a small % of liquid assets in gold and silver as a rabbit hole. If your strategy is to buy and sell gold for a profit in the short term, then that's a different goal. My preference is investments that generate dividend and income over those that do not.
I've been advocating holding 1%-2% of assets in gold on this forum since 2007 (viewtopic.php?p=1049&highlight=gold#1049). In the ~6 years since, I came to the realization that if you're holding it for emergencies, then selling it would defeat that purpose. If it was my intent to tell people to use gold as a primary or major investment, then I wouldn't have said only 1%-2%. My investment strategy today is simple:
1. Invest in cash-flow positive residential real estate for the long term.
2. Keep 1%-2% of your assets in gold for emergencies. (buy low and hold, not sell)
3. You (the target audience) most likely already own mutual funds through 401(k) and IRA accounts.
In other words, buy and hold, buy and hold, buy and hold. Those who follow this strategy will make no profit on their gold. I repeat, no profit. There is no "sell high".
1. The RE investments are cash flow, and thus rising/falling RE prices should not impact you as much. You sit back and collect rent, let your property manager do the work.
2. The gold is held for emergencies and not intended for sale. Rising/falling gold prices should not keep you up at night.
3. Your 401(k) and IRA accounts will most likely be kept until your retirement age (or 59 & 1/2 or whatever). Leave it alone.
If you speculate in gold (or stocks or commodities) and made a bundle, good for you. That is not the financial advice I give to people. The kind of financial advice I give today seek monthly income, which can be put into savings toward buying the next investment property. Those who wish to follow my advice will make NO PROFIT on their gold holdings -- the gold is neither a trade, nor an investment, nor a hedge against inflation. It's simply money for emergencies and preservation of wealth.
If your head is still stuck on the 2008 thread, feel free to bang your head there and feel proud about your investment choices. It's always easier to look back and say "wow I hit the jackpot" or "damn I should have put my money on that". I don't like to play that game. What I want is that stack of rent checks in the mail, every month, month after month.
1. If you've been advocating holding just 1-2% of assets in gold since 2007, your advice lead to people missing out on a huge multi-year bull market with 98-99% of their assets.
2. BTW, I don't own any mutual funds nor do I have a 401K so you're wrong on that front too.
3. Anyone who ignored your advice that "gold and silver are over-priced and you should wait until they drop before buying" by investing heavily into these metals (say 5-20%) and holding all the way until now would be sitting on huge profits, not 'no profits' as you call them. Just because you don't realize gains does not mean they aren't there. It just means they are so far unrealized so you can avoid being taxed on them. Profits can be realized or unrealized. According to your logic, if I bought an asset that later lost most of its value (say one of Donald Trump's casinos back when they first listed on the stock market) and never sold to this day, I would have no losses just because I had not realized them. Sounds like wishful thinking in this case. Enron also pretended a lot of such losses didn't exist but of course, it didn't stop them from destroying the company.
4. I read your earlier post. But it wasn't really very early. It was November 18, 2012 and just a distraction from your original 2008 advice. If you always felt that way, why did you much ever say that gold and silver were overpriced if your strategy is just to accumulate a tiny amount and hold forever or until emergency need arises. That "gold and silver are over-priced and you should wait until they drop before buying" is not consistent with what you are now claiming has always been your own personal strategy and advice to others.
5. BTW, why would you need gold for an emergency? You could always buy it when the need arose on the free market. Since you thought on October 3, 2008 that "gold and silver are over-priced and you should wait until they drop before buying", wouldn't it make sense to buy it later after prices dropped assuming the need arose? After all, that's what your advice suggests even tho it turned out to be so dead wrong. And you also mentioned in another post that if the shit really hit the fan in the USA and civilization ceased to function normally, gold would probably be pretty worthless. I'm not seeing a lot of consistency here.
6. Advising heavy exposure to RE investments (even rental properties) back in 2007 would have set those who followed your advice up for major exposure to the property crash. However, anyone who had 'shorted' your advice - sell all their real estate and buy up silver and gold, in a big way would have made out like a bandit, lol.